good luck

Lol I hate the slogans and truncated sentences. So pretentious and desparate.

I see this type of comment everywhere now. I don't know what to call this disposition. In this context, yes I would like to see some people go to jail. But who would be putting these people in jail? Well it is the state. So this npub does want the state to act in one manner, but not the other, and that then somehow means someone fell for something... Without any hint of recognition that millions of people just got the boot of socialism off their necks. and also that all state actions are bad.

Retards voted for this guy twice and he hasn't delivered on anything critical - literally not a single person has been arrested while he was in office. Instead more of the same were brought in, they strung people along for years with useless Epstein nonsense, and now America continues with American imperialism that most of the world is sick of. You don't understand that it doesn't matter if it's a socialist dictatorship or not as long as the dictator is friendly with the regime. So you have to cope like anyone really gives a fuck about what happens to people in Venezuela. It may be a good thing for Venezuelans, yet the whole point is that it doesn't benefit Americans because nothing a state does is for their benefit of it's people. This has nothing to do with socialism and everything to do with America maintaining their position in the world. Yeah no shit it would be the state putting people in prison, you're just mad that you got had by voting in the first place when nothing was delivered on, and that's the very thing that humors me.

Nailed it

This is the problem with libertarian thinking. You lose no matter what. Dead end is an accurate depiction of

You do not fight criminals via the channels they set up for you to fight them. You cannot defeat an enemy so long as you are paying them to oppress you. The harder you work, the more powerful you make your enemy.

I don't think we lose no matter what. But I think playing politics is always a losing game because you cannot fight criminals via the channels they set up for you to fight them.

Participating in national politics is what has caused the very issues we are dealing with today. If participating in national politics actually did something, voting would be made illegal. Counter-economics sounds like a much more efficient way to solve problems than to just to pick the a slavemaster every four years.

You lose no matter what if you continue to enable the State's monopoly on violence by supporting the status quo through voting and taxation. If anything, libertarianism, especially through agorism, is the only way to starve the State by not using its resources and funding it. Counter-economics is the your ticket out of statism!

What gives an entity a monopoly on violence? How does such a thing emerge?

bad take bro

Thank you for your deeply thoughtful counter arguement. Your reply is more of exactly what I am referring to: smug one liners with no substance.

yeah lol