Hilarious how desperate you are, building a theory based upon an assumption that someone would mistype "Adam" as "Andy."
Regardless, all of your strained ad hominems are irrelevant in the context of the spam debate. Adam's reputation, whether it be good or bad, has no bearing upon the debate.
This is all just cannon fodder for your delicious drama vlogging ๐
Login to reply
Replies (5)
you defending adams actions just because kratter is attacking him? This is low iq slop lopp.
You'll have to be more specific. As far as I've seen, all this Epstein stuff was Austin Hill's doing.
Cope harder Lameson.
Cope harder pliz
Do you realise that people lost faith in you as maintainer? Nobody cares what you have to say even if it's about something ridiculous like this.