You misunderstood my note there. El Salvador was run by gangs. A protest is not a gang. An organized, even a funded, protest is still not a gang (these accusations need to be proven before you give them credence). What makes America different than most countries is that our rights are protected by law. Right to assemble, right to speak, right to be armed... The arguments you are being misled by serve as justification for denying Americans their rights. I don't care about these protesters' politics. I don't agree with them on much, if anything. They still have rights. What ICE us doing is making America less safe, more like El Salvador before Bukele.

Replies (7)

BottleTeams's avatar
BottleTeams 3 months ago
"What ICE is doing is making America less safe" Are you fucking delusional? Defund the police 2.0 You're propagandized. again.
If the protestors weren't blatantly advertising that they intend to stop ICE, instead of just protesting, then sure, I'd give credence to your perspective. But the anti-ICE messaging has stopped being just protests and is voicing direct opposition and prohibition.
the gangs sell the crack, the crackheads use it. protestors are the crackheads, and the NGOs and local government operatives are the gangsters. i've personally witnessed this kind of local level corruption in practically every place i have ever lived. i also have had somewhat close contact with antifa, i met a famous one who was imprisoned for knifing a nazi punk in Sofia 14 years ago. i also spent an evening at an antifa bar where i saw this guy pictured on a poster on the wall. they are militant activists. they literally are footsolders, shock troops. do you have sympathy, inherently, in those who let themselves be sent to be slaughtered on the front line, or the ones that rot in prison for going AWOL or refusing to obey the command to enlist and be conscripted? no, i don't think protesting is a right. nor do i think that begging to media companies and politicians is ever going to do anything but serve their nefarious ends. the extent to which i consider protest to be valid, is simply writing and speaking against something. i write and speak against injustice all the time. i'm completely obsessed with it because i have been victimized so much in my life. i also, because of that experience, know what the machinations of manipulation look like, because that is always the first line of attack, before the physical. manipulating, spectacles. the reference to terrorism you made, it's not quite correct because what is common is spectaclular events. the purpose behind it is different, and particular to each individual who joins the protest. the best example i can give is my philosophy on how it came to be that cannabis was legalised in much of the USA: ever heard the expression "overgrow the government"? or noticed the hydro shops in every city? that's why it ended. people just literally stopped buying cartel mexican weed and smoking local, high quality, often organic indoor, highly bred, high quality cannabis. idk even what the protestors are trying to achieve tho? it's not like it's invisible the other side of it, the rising crime rates, the rape gangs, the jihadis, and then the blac blocs, molotovs and convenient stacks of bricks placed around the night before a planned protest. it's just a waste of time to protest. direct action is always better. i applaud the brave saboteurs who destroy surveillance and speed/traffic cameras, and other people who grief toxic injust bureaucracies. the people who grow and smoke their own weed in their own house. the immigrants who actually try to integrate and are actually looking to live in a better place, not to turn the new place into the same as what they supposedly ran from. because it's getting like that. there is going to be a lot more violence yet, and promoting joining those protests is going to become very obviously a bad idea to most people without psychiatric disorders. staying in the cities where they are happening, is also going to become more and more a bad idea. i mean, look at the protests over the AI data centers happening in the eastern states these days. anyhow, as to the question, there may be some cases of people being paid to protest, and i'm pretty sure there has been at least some cases, but what's more disturbing is that they are being taught to be agent provocateurs. summary: the protests are not organic, grass roots movements. that's enough for me to discount any stories about it, on either side. the que bono? is very clear to me. it's warfare between oligarchs. ● Summary: NGOs, Paid Protesters, and Protest Training in the USA Documented Protest Infrastructure Professional Training Networks: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Fithian, a 63-year-old "nonviolent direct action trainer," charges over $300/day for consulting. She was observed at Columbia's 2024 protests teaching barricading techniques. NYPD labeled her a https://www.foxnews.com/us/nypd-release-video-showing-professional-protest-consultant-columbia-university. She claims she doesn't organize protests, only provides safety training. Commercial Paid Protest Services: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowds_on_Demand, founded by Adam Swart in 2012, openly provides paid protesters ($100-few hundred per person). The company reported a https://www.foxnews.com/media/crowds-demand-ceo-provides-insight-paid-protester-requests-up-400-under-trump. Swart claims he turned down $20 million for anti-Trump protests and is now https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/ceo-congress-law-who-pays-protesters/ about protest funding. Active Congressional Investigations (2025) The People's Forum / Neville Roy Singham: - investigating The People's Forum for alleged CCP ties and potential FARA violations - Singham (Chicago-born, Shanghai-based billionaire) donated to The People's Forum through shell organizations - Funding saw ($486,900 to $4.4 million) - https://www.grassley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/grassley_to_doj_fbi_-_code_pink_and_the_peoples_forum.pdf sent letters to DOJ/FBI requesting investigation of Code Pink and The People's Forum Anti-ICE Protest Funding (January 2025): - into LA anti-ICE protest funding - investigating CHIRLA (received ~$1 million in Biden-era grants) - Crowds on Demand revealed it received but declined What Fact-Checkers Say - found "several degrees of separation" between Soros funding and specific protesters - paying individual protesters - notes: funding for "coordination, data, and communications is materially different from payroll for protest attendees" - no evidence of "systematic micro-payments to each marcher" Key Distinction The evidence shows: 1. Infrastructure funding exists - NGOs fund training, logistics, transportation, communications 2. Professional organizers exist - people like Fithian are paid to train protesters 3. Paid crowd services exist - companies like Crowds on Demand operate openly 4. Mass individual payments unproven - no documented evidence of widespread per-person payments to ordinary protesters at major demonstrations