Infrastructure is just a service provided. Reminds me of a baker in the UK who refused to bake a cake for a gay couple based on their religious beliefs which created a lot of discussion. Should they be compelled to provide their service or have a right to choose? I think the only way to truly separate infrastructure from ideology is if the infrastructure (i.e. relays) have no view of what they are relaying. It’s probably not just going to be ideology either. There will be legislative reasons. Again, for the UK I wouldn’t be surprised if some relays services feel compelled to not offer services to UK residents. And we should make sure there’s more than 1 baker in town :-)