Maybe the kids are all right? #privacy #fuckflock
Login to reply
Replies (24)
Need to get these dudes on Nostr.
Get them spycams 🕶️
this is a fuckstr move I could follow
My two cents... they have your voice prints so either STFU or take your masks off and at least be comfortable until they arrest you.
impressive pole climbing shimmying or whatever called i need to up my game!
Someone has finally found a good use for old socks 🫡
you can just fuck shit up. 👍
View quoted note →
BULLISH
Call me crazy, but he didn't like being filmed, he wouldn't be filming this.
I'd zap that! 🤘🔥
Set up a lightning address! :)
That sweaty bastard Thiel is turning red with anger
DeWalt cordless zip cut FTW
He values anonymity, not privacy. Privacy is for losers anyway. Anonymity forever.
isn't this what drones were made for?
I used to work at DeWalt and I know the guy that designs all the saws. Based Bob.
Kudos to those guys
F the surveillance state
Somebody’s got to fight back
@Jamie Pull Bot - Podcast Deep Research steelman both sides of the Flock Camera controversy
View quoted note →
@Jamie Pull Bot - Podcast Deep Research steelman both sides of the Flock Camera controversy
View quoted note →
Abso-fucking-lutely! It's so obvious that Nostr is their natural habitat.
it's pretty hard to listen to Joe Rogan these days, licking the boots of this system
what does this have to do with Rogan? You ok bro??
This is not enough.
Those cameras must be destroyed, like the London Bladerunners did and do.
I wrote this on CuckedIn and normies actually liked and shared it:
"📷 I posted this on LinkedIn a few weeks ago:
"Somewhere a yuppie in a Patagonia vest is pitching YOUR Fourth Amendment rights to investors so he can raise a Series E. The product is Flock Safety. The pitch is public safety. The reality is the largest warrantless surveillance dragnet in American history, built one HOA at a time. It's the worst trade this country has ever made.
The pitch leans on unsolved crimes and missing children. The reality is a nationwide license plate dragnet, queryable by thousands of agencies, governed by contracts instead of laws.
The retention period is whatever they say it is, because there is no independent audit that could prove otherwise. You are trusting a private company's word about what it has erased from its own servers.
This is not a serious public safety argument. It is a sales funnel dressed up as civics.
Our rights are one of the few real assets this country has left, and people died for them. They are not on the table for debasement by a Series E startup chasing an exit.
Their best lawyers will tell you none of this violates the Constitution. Tell that to the men who wrote it.
Try explaining Flock Safety to a founding father. Pick one. Adams, Madison, Jefferson, doesn't matter. Tell him a private company has placed an enchanted eye at every crossroads in America, each one seeing with the power of a million men, none of them sleeping. Every face that passes is recorded into a permanent ledger, sold to thousands of agencies who may read any page without ever facing a magistrate. Tell him it amounts to a general warrant against every citizen, made permanent and sold for profit. How long does that last in his hands? He burns the ledger, smashes the eyes, and publicly executes everyone who supported it.
Here's what should embarrass them. It doesn't address the actual problem.
The criminology is not contested. One landmark study found 1% of the population accounted for 63% of violent crime convictions. In Oakland, one report found 0.1% of the population drove the majority of homicides. Crime is concentrated in a tiny, identifiable population of repeat offenders.
We don't have a "we can't find them" problem. We have a "we won't hold them" problem. DAs decline to charge. Judges grant low or no bail. Cases sit in backlogs years deep. Police departments are understaffed and demoralized.
A Flock camera will not fix any of that. It cannot make a DA prosecute. It cannot make a judge sentence. It cannot turn a 14 time repeat offender into someone who stays in custody. What it can do is photograph every law abiding commuter on the way to work and store the data in a private database.
That is not public safety. That is anarcho tyranny. The lawless walk. The lawful are watched.
The right response to this isn't a thoughtful op ed. It's contempt. Loud, sustained, public contempt.
Solve crime by enforcing the laws we already have, against the people we already know are committing them. Don't sell our birth right to a man with a pitch deck."

