I have now fully open sourced the code which creates this on-chain BIP-444 futures contract! image The contract starts with an atomic deposit into the contract address of 1 BTC each (to make sure both parties put in the same amount into the contract address). Context: BIP-444 makes the use of OP_IF & OP_NOTIF consensus INVALID upon activation. The contract is built as follows: The taproot address uses the NUMS point as described in BIP341, to provably show the key path is not active. We have two parties, a "YES" (444 activates) and "NO" (444 does NOT activate). YES and NO for short. The first leaf is a 2 of 2 multisig of both parties. This exists to be able to self send the UTXO AFTER BIP 444 activates. This is because BIP-444 just added a clause that UTXOs created before activation will NOT have the BIP-444 consensus rules applied to them. This self send removes that exception. image The second leaf: has 2 ways you can spend with it, a 2 of 2 (YES and NO) multisig, just like the first leaf OR the NO party, with a time lock which is LESS THAN the third tap leaf. This is important because it uses OP_NOTIF image The Third Leaf: The YES party can spend, after a time lock AFTER the second leaf. image The order of the timelocks is important. If BIP-444 activates, the spending condition that can spend before you will be consensus invalid, so it doesn't matter if you believe 444 activates. So to summarize: - If BIP-444 DOES activate, the party who believes it will be able to use the second tap leaf to get 2 BTC out. - If BIP-444 DOES NOT activate, the party who believes that will use the third tap leaf to get 2 BTC out. Since each side is highly confident in their position, the fair market price is a 1:1 ratio, implying 50% likelihood. With 85 days until activation, this contract as written gives you an implied ~430% APY on your bitcoin! The risk is being incorrect on your opinion of BIP-444 activating. You could modify the collateral each side puts up to get different implied odds of the futures contract as well. Github: Address: Anyone who wants to take the BIP-444 WILL activate side, let me know! The Author of the BIP has agreed to this, I have already asked for a larger bet size beyond the 1 BTC I initially proposed, but I have more!

Replies (29)

SatsAndSports's avatar
SatsAndSports 1 month ago
Dathon Ohm agreed to do this with you!? Nice. I hope you can link to the transactions when it's set up I've kinda ignored the details of Bitcoin Script, this might be a little project to get me into studying it 📚
Default avatar
unknown 1 month ago
I don’t think BitcoinMechanic is a whole coiner
“You have all your savings in bitcoin?” “That’s right Dave.” “and you can’t even pay your bills because all your bitcoin is locked up in a smart contract which is betting on a fork and it pays 430% APY?” “That’s right Dave.” image View quoted note →
I thing a dirty information war is upon us regarding the “soft fork BIP-444” an no need to poor more oil into the fire 🔥 I would prefer a more educational approach.
Nope. For those of you newer to Bitcoin, the last time there was a contentious fork, a futures market in 2017 was put up by Bitfinex.
⚠️We make the Perfect replicas from Passports and 🆔🪪 from Spain and Belgium. 🪄We produce them from scratch providing you a brand new identity to travel safe or even open offshore bank accounts. 😎Escrow payment of your choice! 😀You can even open online bank accounts with it as it passes the scans in the registration step. 📱Live video proof of the making process✌🏻 DM for more information. 🙏🏻
Let's see if the author of the BIP really puts sats behind his words. It's a digital-only new account so it's easy to throw words when long-term you're not risking reputation.
Ademan's avatar
Ademan 1 month ago
In what way is that a lie?...
Just finished watching your interview with Danny on WBD. It was great to get some clarity, and a fuller explanation of your above comment. You've convinced me well, thanks. 👍