Cyph3rp9nk's avatar
Cyph3rp9nk cyph3rp9nk@getalby.com yesterday
There is another very interesting theory put forward by @Justin (shocknet) ⚡ that argues the conflict between “core” and “knots” is a psychological operation designed to get us to accept “covenants,” which would undermine the nature of Bitcoin as we know it. I don’t rule out this possibility either.
Stacker News
The Case Against BIP110 \ stacker news
The Case Against BIP110 by Satonymous 2026-June-11 UTC This is to state the case against BIP110, and to bring awareness to various identified vulne...
Cyph3rp9nk's avatar Cyph3rp9nk
If you look closely, the Core vs. knots conflict is just a few people against a few others; the rest remain silent, but: - Core is clearly corrupt - knots was an alternative But: - knots has built the bip-110 narrative on a fantasy So: - I doubt that after the spectacular failure that BIP-110 will be, knots will continue as such Which: Leaves us Bitcoiners in a pretty screwed situation and at the mercy of the CIA
View quoted note →

Replies (12)

Artel 21's avatar
Artel 21 yesterday
It’s Landauer Attach orchestrated by Core on Bitcoin. We need harder protection than BIP-110, take a look at our research
1 replies ↓
Tauri's avatar
Tauri tauri@mynostr.com yesterday
Fuck Covenants. Jeremy Rubin appears over 700 times in the Epstein files. I’d never support CTV and I’m ready to run a URSF if they ever try to force the activation. BTW BIP110 FTW
Tauri's avatar
Tauri tauri@mynostr.com yesterday
BIP110 is temporary precisely because it’s a crude fix that it’s only meant to give us time to find a more refined permanent solution. It’s even stated on the bip110 website.
1 replies ↓
The_Crin's avatar
The_Crin thecrin@satlantis.io yesterday
Una pregunta, si uno no puede conseguir un disco de mayor tamaño para seguir ejecutando un nodo de bitcoin sin ningun filtro y con esto uno ya no necesita tener un terabyte de espacio para ejecutar un nodo, que opciones tienen aquellos que intentan ejecutar sus propios nodos pero no pueden darse el lujo de conseguir discos de mayor capacidad?
1 replies ↓
Artel 21's avatar
Artel 21 yesterday
Will simplify language over next few days. The whole idea is that block should have all bytes backed by satoshis. Right now it’s cheap to store data it should be expensive to stimulate high quality L2 solutions and reduce spam simultaneously. Miners will get higher fees if people need to include more data, nodes can favour lean transaction, L2 users would need to care about what they inscribe. Win win win.
1 replies ↓
Kyma Fi's avatar
Kyma Fi kymafi@nostrcheck.me yesterday
Are you purposely forgetting that Adam back is in Epstein files and Epstein literally FUNDED Core through a cut out … then all this shit started happening? Blaming it on knots is insane. Without knots bitcoin would be fully centralized at the client level and beyond saving
↑