Replies (40)

It's such a weird dynamic. On the Core side, what is the argument against Knots? That it doesn't 100% guarantee spam mitigation? That's just comp sci pedantry -- some rules are meant to balance or nudge; not guarantee the elimination of behavior. That you might be stupid if you run Knots? Oh sweetheart, please tell me that you understand bitcoin culture well enough that you know telling a pack of rabid defiant-personality-disorder conspiracy-prone go-hards they are stupid is guaranteed to yield the opposite intended effect. Knots is revitalizing people's interest in running nodes, and IF YOU TRULY BELIEVE that it DOESNT ACTUALLY ACCOMPLISH ANYTHING OUTSIDE OF INTENDED NODE OPERATION, THEN WHAT IS THE NET HARM OCCURRING HERE?
X is engineered to make people hate each other. The algorithm lights up parts of the brain that make people feel like they are accomplishing something; like they are defending territory.
Vezire's avatar
Vezire 5 months ago
Yeah, it ALWAYS shows me things I strongly disagree with. I never engage on X. It’s toxic.
Im slowly unfollowing and muting core promoters/defenders because it’s feeling disingenuous at best and malicious at worst. β€”When things don’t make sense in a logical argument, (after hours of debate) it’s usually because someone is withholding their genuine motives (ie, lying) Having listened to hours and hours of both sides, I am more and more convinced that Shinobi, Lopp, Shapiro etc are bad actors that are up to no good. πŸ§‘πŸ‘ŠπŸ»πŸ»
Raybon's avatar
Raybon 5 months ago
Core is based. There is block space for sale and you can't control a free market like bitcoin The Knotzi narrative is ridiculous, autistic and bitcoin is a free and open protocol and I am so thankful these people cannot control it
/rant πŸ˜† Im assuming you do watch mechanic’s video content lately? I’m a natural sceptic in general and I can’t for the life of me understand the core 3.0 defense argument. I also don’t understand why the open hostility towards knots use. Knots is an immune response to a β€œperceived” threat vector. If knots is wrong about core (if core innocent and not malicious), nothing happens. If core is wrong about knots, bad things can happen. Feels like a no brainer. β€”On top of that, why would core devs give two shits if people are running knots or not? πŸ€”
That’s unfortunate. It’s important. BTW, I don’t think you or anyone should take my (or others) advice. Instead, you need to take the time understand it and have your own position. Im open to changing my mind on this but the whole anti knots argument thing stinks to high heaven. Okay, I’m really done with my rant now haha πŸ˜† πŸ§‘πŸ‘ŠπŸ»πŸ»
Sorry, this is conflation of terms like 'free' and 'open'. I see this confusion in many areas (like political thought), not just Bitcoin. Free and open in civilized societies (or where that is the goal) doesn't mean 'do whatever you want.' That isn't freedom, but hellscape. If we don't remove the filters, they can only force things in via out-of-band, which only works with overly-centralized mining... which is something we can't have (and need to fix) anyway (and such efforts are heavily underway). We don't actually have to cater to the attacks just because we can't stop 100%. Do you use an email service with spam filters?
Just reported him for promoting self harm. Because that's what encouraging spam is. In addition to being societal harm.
Raybon's avatar
Raybon 5 months ago
Bitcoin is not email It doesn't care what you think it should be used for And you can't stop people using it in ways your autistic ass doesn't like. Sorry, but that's how censorship resistance works. Good luck with your knotzis and money transmission law pals over there with your tether funded pool. Hope it works out for ya
Same. Anyone actively complaining about people running knots is absurd. LIKE WHO CARES? Shitcoin scammers. That's who.
This is what I mean. You've conflated what censorship resistant means. That is in regard to financial transactions. If we (Bitcoiners as a community) want to stop non-financial transactions, or over so many bytes of data, etc. we can do that. Bitcoin might not care, but it follows the rules we as a community decide because we decide on the code. *I* can't stop anyone, but *we* can.
Raybon's avatar
Raybon 5 months ago
Its not a democracy This concept of "community" isn't real. There's block space for sale, and you can't decide what others want to do with it.
Raybon's avatar
Raybon 4 months ago
You can do whatever you want miners decide what goes in blocks regardless of the software a cohort of users might believe about what should or should not go there. Bitcoin is based on economic incentives. There is no belief or ideology present. Bitcoin is anarchy
↑