jb55's avatar
jb55 _@jb55.com 5 months ago
why would nuclear engineers entertain the opinion of the general public? you could argue bitcoin is more important than the operation of a nuclear power plant. its engineering and game theory over feels.

Replies (13)

I’m a nuclear engineer. Sometimes the best ideas come from contractors who have real world experience. We are all plebs including the devs.
Leigh's avatar
Leigh 5 months ago
A flawed analogy. Node runners are not the general public, although it is a spectrum, so more like sub-station operator or lineman. Still a flawed analogy… The key part is not the engineering (I’m tired of repeating this). It’s more like a government which was previously serving the public but then began to serve corporate interests. People hate that shit.
I think the current devs should be far more humble. It's only once in a century -- or maybe ten centuries -- that a discovery like Bitcoin is made. It should be approached with a reverence compared to which mere conservatism would look like libertine excess. The vibes I'm getting from Core and their sycophants is "we are anarchic geniuses, you know nothing compared to us, only we 'know what bitcoin is'; we've got a lot of things we want to try -- wheee! -- so just shut up, stop spoiling our fun, and enjoy the anarchy."
Default avatar
sato-g 5 months ago
First, flawed analogy. A nuclear plant is a centralized, permissioned entity. Bitcoin's governance (by design) is social consensus, not a dictatorship of engineers. The engineers serve the users, not the other way around. Without adoption and buy-in from the public, the most elegant code is just a failed project. #bitcoin #knots View quoted note →
probably best middle ground would be leave the default and give users ability to change if they want
This needs a good strawman! Here you go! Have you heard of central bank ? They believe they need to control the money, they think they are smarter than the market.