I'm human, you know, and I get angry, quite easily in fact.
I can hardly spend my Bitcoin without going through fiat.
It's all very nice in theory, but in practice most Bitcoiners aren't doing anything that really matters.
If you don't understand my warnings, you're just sucking your own dick. To progress, you have to be critical of yourself and your surroundings. Although I admit that sucking dicks gets you further.
Wake up, damn it, and use Bitcoin for what it's meant for.
Cyph3rp9nk
I have to make this post because otherwise I'll explode, and obviously I don't think it will make anyone happy, but that's what it means to be free and not care what others say.
As you know, I've had my ups and downs with Monero supporters, but a few weeks ago I decided to put that behind me and start trying out everything in the Monero ecosystem, and I can only say that Monero's privacy works and in that respect it's wonderful. Bitcoin on layer 1 has nothing on Monero in that area. Monero is totally fungible and by default, without complications.
That said, my conclusion is that Bitcoin and Monero are like night and day, so different that I don't think they even compete with each other, but so different that I think you have to cover yourself by holding both in case one fails.
- Bitcoin has a limited supply, never more than 21 million. Monero has a queue emission of 0.6 Monero per block approximately every 2 minutes. In practice, by 2050 there will be 22.64 million Monero and by 2100 there will be 30.53 million Monero. This is a totally different model for securing the network through subsidies.
- In Bitcoin, the supply is fully verifiable. In Monero, you have to trust that the underlying cryptography has no implementation errors and that there has been no hidden inflation. This is the price to pay for privacy.
- Bitcoin has a maximum block size of 4MB and scales through layer 2 solutions. Monero has a dynamic block size that allows it to remain functional in times of stress, but it must be accepted that if the chain were heavily used, decentralization would be lost.
- Mining is also completely opposite. Bitcoin chose to professionalize it at the expense of decentralization but being more resistant to state attacks due to its hash power. Monero is the opposite, preferring to make it more decentralized with conventional equipment but vulnerable to state attacks due to its low hash power.
- When it comes to privacy, the discussion is quite short. Monero is private and fungible at layer 1, Bitcoin is not.
And aside from these things, which I believe are objective and I am not going to evaluate, what I am going to evaluate is that Bitcoin is losing the Cypherpunk ideals, as demonstrated by its development. I believe that both Core and those who support BIP110 have lost their way.
So, given that Bitcoin and Monero are diametrically opposed and given the danger of Bitcoin's failed development, it is worth considering Monero as an alternative.
View quoted note →
Replies (15)
If you cannot use Bitcoin directly one can always spend Bitcoin indirectly via Bitrefill for example.
Bro that's exactly what he's talking about. Bitcoin's use is hampered by fiat checkpoints, gift cards, exchanges, payment processors. All of these are major data leaks that ultimately hurt, not help, Bitcoin adoption.
If you spend very likely it will finish in wall street pockets. Those accepting using wos and coinos are weak hands here only for the money. It's still early to spend sats. Thuth is best strategy to win this war is hodl.
That's the worse way of using it. You give sats to bitrefill that soon after sells it very likely to black rock.
If you HODL, the reasons Bitcoin isn't used get worse. You gotta be the change you wish to see on the world.
No, se need more people hodling now. And less big funds buying. Using everyday will arrive naturally as it's already a slow and organic progress
And also hodling not spending makes the price go higher, the higher the price for our enemies then. This is how we win, with a low time preference mindset.
If not now then when? If not you then who?
If you wait forever for some magical day Bitcoin will be useful it will never come. As the network grows, L1 becomes cost prohibitive, and L2 lightning self custody becomes insecure since it relies on on-chain settlements for security. If a force close is $10 or $100 than any small transaction amount becomes a risk.
All this is to say that the best time to use Bitcoin as MoE was yesterday, second best is today. If Bitcoin is used, then the necessary upgrades to facilitate its use will be put in place and only THEN will you get your magical worldwide adoption day.
On this course, it will be, 100% custodial and useless even for buying gift cards in no time.
On the other hand if you receive 1000 of salary buy every month all in sats and spend 100% only in sats. This forces you to spread adoption while trying to save the most you can. Don't spend your hodling sats, acumulste more.
This is completely wrong. Spending creates an entire new cohort of adopters: merchants. At some point merchants start onboarding other merchants (like holders onboard other holders). They buy and hold like you do, and create additional demand for new participants, especially if they demand bitcoin, instead of fiat. This is a very rookie take.
No, most of them are just for the money don't hold stop accepting when the price falls like now and say bad things about it. There are a few exceptions tough, to those I spend sats.
Spedning sats > spendning with fiat rails > not spedning at all
Now that it has become easier to spedn sats directly, indirect (with fiat rails) is not good enough anymore, it seems.
Adoption is growing, so keep calm and keep on-boarding merchants and consumers. That's how you get to spedn more sats directly.
Yeah that just sounds like cope. The best thing you can do if you want to nuke Bitcoins power as freedom money is to only HODL it and tell other to do the same while telling people not to sell it.
Start a bitxoin only business. This is the way