Are companies like Strike really Bitcoin companies, or are they just surveillance companies for Bitcoiners? Here is a Claude analysis from the latest Strike Privacy Policy https://strike.me/legal/privacy/ and Terms of Service https://strike.me/legal/tos/ : ⚡ Strike (strike.me) Privacy & ToS Breakdown — What You're Actually Agreeing To Before you use Strike, here's what the fine print actually says: 📋 Data They Collect Full legal name, DOB, address, email, phone, SSN/gov ID, bank account & routing numbers Photos of your government ID + facial geometry scans (biometric data) via their KYC partner (Persona) Your IP address, device identifiers, MAC address, location (inferred from IP), and full behavioral usage data Transaction history pulled from your linked bank account via third-party financial data providers Advertising partner data about your interests and behavior across other websites 🔗 Where Your Data Goes Persona (KYC/biometric partner) — scans your face, stores it up to 3 years Checkout.com — processes card transactions under their own privacy policy Advertising networks — Strike explicitly shares your data for targeted ads across other platforms. You can opt out, but only for mobile, and only via a separate form Financial institution partners — vary by region, not named Business partners, professional advisors, analytics providers, and marketing companies Any acquirer in a merger or asset sale 🏛 Government & Law Enforcement Access Strike is a regulated Money Services Business (MSB) licensed with the NY DFS and registered with FinCEN. This means: They file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) with FinCEN, shared with the FBI, DEA, IRS, and ICE — and are legally prohibited from telling you this happened They comply with subpoenas, court orders, and government requests and will hand over your data The Travel Rule applies: if you send bitcoin to another exchange (especially in EU/UK), your name, address, and ID details go to the receiving institution OFAC sanctions screening of every user They explicitly reserve the right to "disclose any information necessary to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, Sanctions programs, legal process, governmental request, or law enforcement request" ⚠ Key Rights You're Giving Up No class action. The international TOS routes disputes to English courts (or El Salvador arbitration for El Salvador customers) — no US class action recourse for international users $100 liability cap. If Strike causes you losses of any amount, their maximum liability to you is $100 No consequential damages. Lost profits, trading losses, lost funds — all waived All transactions are final and irreversible — wrong address, lost funds, Strike bears zero responsibility They can freeze or terminate your account at any time, for any reason, including at a third party's request (e.g., a subpoena), and your funds may remain frozen indefinitely during an investigation They can change the TOS at any time — continued use = acceptance, even without direct notice to you You grant Strike a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide license to use any content you upload to improve and market their services They can block you by IP or device ID at their sole discretion 🍪 Tracking Uses cookies, web beacons, and pixel tags Does not honor Do Not Track (DNT) signals Shares data with advertisers for targeted advertising — you must opt out manually 💡 Bottom Line Strike is a legitimate, licensed fintech. But it is a fully KYC'd, AML-compliant, data-sharing, ad-supported, regulated financial surveillance platform. It collects biometric data, shares your info with advertisers and law enforcement, can freeze your funds without notice, caps its own liability at $100, and collects behavioral data across the web. That is not a criticism — it is what regulated financial services look like. But it is the opposite of financial privacy. If privacy is your priority, self-custody your bitcoin. ⚡🟠 image

Replies (28)

Bitcoin Mises's avatar
Bitcoin Mises 0 months ago
Seems like they are pretty clear about what they collect and this is all forced by EU/US laws. If they could they would collect a damn thing.
travis's avatar
travis 0 months ago
Fiat company LARPing as a Bitcoin company. The privacy is one thing. There’s also the recent and blatant subordination to the financial industrial complex through their push of Bitcoin credit products, Cantor and Tether involvement, and plan to merge Strike and XXI. People can say what they would like Strike to be. But what it is now is an elite tool to consolidate Bitcoin into the financial industrial complex and stop Bitcoin being used as Freedom money.
IMO the thing that we Bitcoiners don’t really think about or actually go that deep on is that to operate in this fiat system at all you have to fully comply to all their fiat rules. No matter what. The system was never going to let you just freely opt out. Freedom is taken it’s not granted.
If you use Strike or any other exchange in Germany, you are literally required to say who you are sending bitcoin to when you send a transaction even to your cold storage. This isn’t unique to Strike. It’s government regulation and control. View quoted note →
Persona is an Israeli - intelligence linked company that does KYC for the majority of big banks and social media like LinkedIn. Strike is indeed a fuck you state licensed company. They adapted their marketing to Bitcoin maxis that are clueless about Bitcoin's real value.
Sounds to me like you're a sucmbag because you created a company that helps millions of people buy bitcoin, and you did it in a way that complies with federal law so you WON"T go to federal prison. But that's just a guess, I don't really think I'm stupid enough to understand what motivates that kind of people.
Kendy's avatar
Kendy 3 weeks ago
keep it vague so nobody can disprove your claim
No they clearly don’t care at all about users privacy, Just compare @BULL BITCOIN's PP to @strike's, They both operate in EU under MICA, But have totally different values and incentives, Its day and night, You have real CypherPunks and Fiat Shills, The choice is yours 🤷🏽‍♂️