LMAO WTF FFS
Login to reply
Replies (39)
Is the author Jewish ?
Who was the guest author, the FCC?
Tim Wu, law professor at Columbia University.
They should be censored for publishing that. 😉
>Guest essay
You know what. You may be right.
Every.Single.Time
What's it done now!?
The Old Grey Lady has worms.
NYT is a C.I.A cum-rag anyway, everyone knows that.
Boo-hoo Tim Wu
😂😂😂
We need to become fascist in order to combat fascism!
The author is unhappy the government can’t control moderation decisions on user generated by platforms. AFAICT, doesn’t address suppression of user speech on privately owned speech platforms.
Loool wtfff 🤣
Pesky-ass Bill of Rights!
HowDareYou.meme
They hate free speech
Chinese.
That's outrageous, cancel their press license.
Dead give away the author (Tim Wu) is a devout fascist/statist:
"The judiciary needs to realize that the First Amendment is spinning out of control. It is beginning to threaten many of the essential jobs of the state, such as protecting national security and the safety and privacy of its citizens."
Onion link so no one has to pay to read this trash:
https://www.nytimesn7cgmftshazwhfgzm37qxb44r64ytbb2dj3x62d2lljsciiyd.onion/2024/07/02/opinion/supreme-court-netchoice-free-speech.html
Well yes, that's the point.
Gay
Gay
Gay
Gay
Gay
Gay
Gay
Gay
wow
Aside from being a defense of totalitarianism, the framing is hilarious - as if the words on a piece of paper were running around wreaking havoc. He means that other people's speech is out of control but doesn't quite want to say that, so prefers to blame the constitution? Dude, just move somewhere that doesn't have free speech built into the constitution.
😂
PSYOP
“In the tavern of a NYC bar they are now peacefully discussing how to progress humanity!”
That's the license that would be required to operate a newspaper, if the power of the federal government wasn't constrained by the 1st amendment.
Yes, WTF!
If they're right - Shut down the New York Times.
I read what I could past the title - I don't have a subscription - but I'm not entirely sure it matters. Headlines and article titles seem to be the primary tools for shifting overton windows and shaping narratives. If he genuinely wanted to blame something other than the first amendment, that should have been reflected in the title.
Point taken though for my interpretation of what the author means. It's a fair assumption based on the title but idk for sure.
According to James below, what the article is really saying is that corporations are out of control. I.e., the title is click bait.