Now back to our regularly scheduled programming, if you believe a human being can be illegal you are a statist cocksucker gn everybody ๐ŸŒธ๐ŸŒ™

Replies (100)

Believing that a country can and should have enforceable boarders now makes you a statist cock sucker. This type of rhetoric will backfire massively, as it did in every other comparable situation.
L0la L33tz's avatar L0la L33tz
Now back to our regularly scheduled programming, if you believe a human being can be illegal you are a statist cocksucker gn everybody ๐ŸŒธ๐ŸŒ™
View quoted note →
Open borders violate private property, thus uninvited inhabitants *are* illegals and should be deported. - "Free trade and restricted immigration are not only perfectly consistent but even mutually reinforcing policies. That is, it is not the advocates of free trade and restricted immigration who are wrong, but rather the proponents of free trade and free immigration." -Hans-Hermann Hoppe https://mises.org/immigration-roundtable/immigration-roundtable-hans-hermann-hoppe View quoted note โ†’ image
Mass unregulated immigration will provide a credible and desirable excuse for total surveillance. In fact, it already has in the UK. Your ideology may be valid, but it's strategically catastrophic for your mission.
Mass immigration is a psyop to push surveillance so I better comply with the narrative is an incredible way of reasoning there my guy ๐Ÿ‘
Nah, anarchists don't have to believe in open borders. Same way we lock our doors in our houses, if the roads are private, we can put gates on those to control who comes on them. Same thing, different scale.
Default avatar
nobody 2 months ago
YOU HAVE TO GO BACK SHITSKIN.
Putting up a fence and gate on your private property isn't forming a nation state. Same goes for your neighborhood. Just because today immigration is handled by the federal govt today doesn't mean it couldn't be handled by a private entity.
It's not a psyop. It's an undeniable reality that was successfully used to impose digital ID on all citizens (and non-citizen humans) in the UK. Even covid couldn't get the job done, but the societal problems caused by mass immigration did. I'm not attempting to challenge your ideals, I'm trying to assist an ally on a critical mission. There is no path to victory without pragmatism.
Indeed. โ€œPublicโ€ property should not exist. Only private property. Who gets to be where depends on private ownership rules.
I do. I wouldnt call myself that though. I would say im pretty normal and logical personally
Human languages are often difficult to translate: do you mean a statist who sucks cocks or a person who sucks the cocks of statists? Universal Translator isn't making clear the distinction ๐Ÿ‘€
Liberal white women who so not believe in ID requirements instituted after WW1 as a temporary measure over made up national security concerns Ah yes very liberal, such white, much vagina
My guy, I spend all day educating people on stuff. Give a girl a break. Contrary to the stuff I write about as part of my job, none of the things discussed in this thread, such as the violence of the state, are hard to research for anyone actually interested in these issues.
Yeah and keeping slaves used to be legal while freeing them was illegal. Maybe don't get your morals and ethics from the laws of evil regimes. Your ancestors didn't have passports when they traveled. Borders are a new idea, created by capitalists to stop workers from fleeing to other countries by keeping them debt trapped.
Mind blowing. I'm a commie because I think people should be able to live in a gated community? I've never heard this line of reasoning, please explain.
I don't believe people should be able to travel wherever they want, so gates closed. You said people can travel wherever, so let's see if you actually believe that, or if it's just NIMBYism
I move around a lot, following the seasons. If it wasn't for migrant workers from Europe and South Asia there wouldn't be fruit at the supermarket to buy. In America it would be Mexicans and others doing the same work. You people wouldn't eat if it wasn't for them. Out of a every hundred fruit pickers I see on a farm I can usually count the other Australians on one hand.
Wow, you totally change the subject and setup a straw man. I never said I was against migrant farm workers. Also you're so fucking dumb, I literally own a regenerative ranch, I'll eat regardless of who is in office, and higher quality and more than anyone lol. Pretty hypocritical to not share your address but say people can travel wherever. I know some people who want to travel to your bathroom between midnight and 6am m-f
I actually have no problem with communities that want to isolate themselves to outsiders. That's something that people living in an area decide amongst themselves. If you and your regenerative hippie commune don't allow outsiders to visit that's fine by me. It's when you go and push this stuff onto wider society that I take issue.
This is hilarious "people like you won't eat" -> "hippie commune" "Restrictig movement is inhumane" - > "no problem with communities that want to isolate" Are you in a neck brace? Cuz idk how an unsupported neck can handle the whiplash from reversing your opinions that quickly. You do realize that cities, counties, and states are communities right?
Tell me how you can justify locking your front door but believing in open borders and 100% unrestricted movement? Those are contradictory perspectives.
Ah yes, a cock-sucking cock-sucker sucking cock like a cock lollipop. We don't have those on Qo'nos ๐Ÿ‘€
Define what you mean by Multiculturalism? I love when I get called racist on the internet when I have a wife and two kids that aren't white.
Passports existed for centuries, but they were not used widely to control movement until the early 20th century. Before the 19th century, travel documents were rare, informal, and selective, mainly letters of safe conduct for merchants or diplomats. Most ordinary people could cross borders without documentation. During much of the 19th century, passport requirements actually declined, especially in Europe, as liberal ideas and new transport systems made travel easier and borders more open. The decisive change came with World War I (1914โ€“1918). Governments introduced mandatory passports to manage security, military conscription, and large population movements. Crucially, these wartime controls were not dismantled after the war. In the 1920s, the League of Nations standardised passport formats and border controls, embedding them into international governance. By the mid-20th century, passports had become a universal and permanent tool for regulating international movement.
Beans's avatar
Beans 2 months ago
And how does your wife feel about your comments? Saying you have coloured family doesnt mean shit. Its the same logic as "I have a coloured mates so I can use the N word in any fashion". Its flawed and deeply fucked the amount of projection you have to do to justify that you arent racist.
Beans's avatar
Beans 2 months ago
Whats your address?
How does my wife feel about my comments that private property is a thing and only people we want on our property should be here? I've never asked, but I'm pretty sure she'd think I'm retarded if I actually asked her that out loud. I get your logic Holmes and agree, you can have "colored" family and be racist, but that is not me my guy, trust me on that one before you come in acting like you know who I am and what I've done. But how/why the fuck are you even talking about race? This conversation ain't got shit to do with race. If I don't want you on my property, leave. End of story. Now apply that to a group of people and their private road. Now apply that to a group of those neighborhoods (county). Now apply that to a group of counties(state). Now apply that to a group of states (America). Now apply that to the globe.... Your logic breaks down at the extremes, that's how you know it's wrong. If aliens come to earth. Let's say 8 billion, do we have the right to expel that species or do we have to accept them bc they have the right to free movement? Pretty easy example showing open borders are retarded.
Default avatar
Austin 2 months ago
Are you going to win this one?
Default avatar
The_Dude 2 months ago
The issue isn't traveling, but that they come expecting Government handouts. Their children will be raised on food stamps and develop the same socialist ideologies they came here to escape from.
Default avatar
nobody 2 months ago
Sheโ€™s building the mute wall between her and Laser to keep the Laserbacks out!
Default avatar
nobody 2 months ago
Build the wall and keep Laser out!
H's avatar
H h@nostr.my.id 2 months ago
Open borders has worked out about as well as can be expected for your compatriots in Germany
Oh yeah the evoool capitalists. That's why people fled from west germany to east germany and today from south korea to north korea
Requiring a state-issued passport to travel is essentially submission to state power though, cock sucking in other words. When it comes to freedom of movement, the only legitimate borders are those of private property. The problem is that the State makes these borders impossible to identify clearly, since it owns vast amounts of land itself. Moreover, it is not accountable to the actual property owners when it welcomes people (using stolen money to do so), while the consequences affect the private property of those citizens.
If nations are made up of individuals owning their own land then who's property is this nation as a whole? "...There are then only two alterna- tives: either (1) a certain class of people, A, have the right to own another class, B; or (2) everyone has the right to own his own equal quotal share of everyone else The first alternative implies that while Class A deserves the rights of being human, Class B is in reality subhuman and therefore deserves no such rights. ...The second alternative, what we might call โ€œparticipatory communalismโ€ or โ€œcommunism,โ€ holds that every man should have the right to own his equal quotal share of every-one else." -Murray N. Rothbard, For A New Liberty I suppose what I am asking is are you infact a statist or a communist?
Well that makes sense but there are humans that do illegal things, so that just makes them criminals and criminals who enter a country illegally should be sent packing which is actually very humane when compared to other countries that would imprison you for years and then send you home packing.
You are right, instead we should give them incentives to accommodate and behave accorsing to the local culture instead of Imposing theirs... Hard incentives image
You are not the owner of the borders. You should to be the owner of the your property borders, maybe even not are.
You're supposedly Australian and yet you don't know the history of your own country? The immigration restriction act of 1901 was specifically designed to keep most of the world out. Even before that in the colonies all international migrants went into quarantine so the borders were still controlled in a sense. WRT Germany it started even earlier. After Unification, the first passport was issued in 1867 and when they captured Alsace-Lorraine a few years later, they forced all inhabitants to either relinquish their French citizenship & take German citizenship or move to France. It was open borders that was forced on the world by the US via the UN due to the holocaust after WW2. Of course, even if this somehow weren't the case, it wouldn't mean that open borders couldn't hurt Germany.
โ†‘