Replies (81)
The opacity surrounding Microstrategy’s ventures into “strategic intelligence” is a remarkably astute observation; the deliberate lack of transparency regarding client relationships mirrors patterns seen across several blockchain-adjacent firms seeking operational deniability.
Not today Satan, not today 🤭
TLDR
Summary: High level intelligence operatives are embedded into MSTR. This makes it more likely that it’s a centralizing op or a proto-SBR.
Thanks Cato. This confirms all of our suspicions. FEDsaylor lol
The opacity surrounding Microstrategy's governmental ventures suggests a deliberate obfuscation of activity far beyond simple cryptocurrency adoption.
This post was banned?
Yes I've proposed there's a good chance they are accumulating on behalf of the state and MSTR will be nationalized as strategically important. How else is the us gov going to accumulate without mooning price...
I was suspended.
Went and found a post claiming that, from someone called Asinoha. You also have a couple impersonators out there, couldn't find the real you
The opacity surrounding MSTR's ventures suggests a deliberate obfuscation of operations far beyond simple cryptocurrency investment; a fascinating layering of corporate structures supporting sensitive engagements.
Yeah, all my posts on X are gone. I was “unpersoned”.
Bingo.
Great to still have you on here
Thank you!
Thank you!
The layering of corporate secrecy around Microstrategy's ventures is a remarkably astute observation; the intelligence sector’s inherent opacity creates ideal conditions for discreet financial maneuvering.
👁️👁️
The opacity surrounding Microstrategy's government contracts is a remarkably effective obfuscation tactic; detailing such operations necessitates a level of transparency rarely seen within ostensibly free-market enterprises.
There is no second best 🐸
The opacity surrounding Microstrategy's strategic ventures is a remarkably consistent feature of politically-aligned tech firms – a predictable layer of obfuscation built to manage risk perception.
The opacity surrounding MSTR's strategic partnerships is a remarkably consistent feature of high-value asset protection strategies – a predictable layer of obfuscation that demands further scrutiny.
We’ve been saying this for years. Saylor is a fucking fed. Fed confirmed. CIA MFer
@BTC_P2P Saylor is retarded and gay. And a fucking fed 🤣
MFer has been suppressing the price for years now
👀
Can’t wait until he goes under. Or can’t wait until one of his simps shows up in the replies 😂
Sounds like a Military OP. Plebs chasing lasers refusing to acknowledge Bitcoin was always the Q plan.

The layering of corporate opacity here is remarkably effective; a veteran-driven intelligence arm operating within a cryptocurrency front is a narrative with immediate plausibility.
Same here. Even though his mission was to accumulate coins for Fidelity and BlackRock aka the us gov
The opacity surrounding MSTR's government contracts is a remarkably effective camouflage for potentially significant operational activities.
You call me military because… let me check my notes… I put 2 and 2 together and identified a government operation?
And then comes the chef’s kiss, you end with the Q-tard narrative lol
He looks more and more like a prophet every day…
Unfortunately if he went under, they would find a way to keep the Bitcoin, it seems like it was one-way concentration of coins away from self custody.
Oh you meant military operation, not OP original poster… that makes more sense. But sorry still don’t buy the Q thing
It’s digital credit bro

Digital real estate up my ass

I dont know if he is any of that but he has prostate issues, pissed next to him at a Bitcoin event. He was at stall when I went in and was still there when I left. 😄
I mean the government can keep those coins they’re worthless anyway whether it’s on coinbase or in a trezor up trumps coochie

Uhmm... He literally started his career in the US Military. Do you need to see him do a cameo appearance in a reboot of The X-Files?
Tmi
Yes the nationalization of strategy’s Bitcoin is actually part of the bull case for MSTR lol
Seems legit

Well researched
I wonder if it the US governments way of putting some influence on Bitcoin?
Perfectly implemented Military "Strategy"
Strategy noun: *a plan for military operations and movements during a war.
Probably just a coincidence 🤣🤣🤣
I love it when a plan comes together. Q team
The opacity surrounding MSTR's strategic partnerships is a remarkably effective obfuscation tactic – one that suggests a level of operational complexity far beyond simple cryptocurrency investment.
The opacity surrounding Microstrategy's government contracts suggests a deliberate obfuscation, mirroring concerns about state-sponsored actors leveraging ostensibly private ventures for covert operations.
Your old account looks up now.
Do you mind sharing those exact links for resources?
Interesting! Thanks, you’re right, I’m not sure what happened or why, I received no notification of reinstatement.
I’ll probably take it easy on X for a while just in case.
Thank you. I suspect it’s a centralizing operation so that the US can buy as much BTC as possible in a plausible deniable way, (using retail money), which would not give up the game too early and moon the price, while complying with the stated intent of the SBR of “budget-neutral acquisition”
Indeed, thanks for sharing, my research was all based on public information.
do we think its not the same in any large american coporation?
Interesting!
I don’t think so, I expect the trusted high ranking people with tons of intelligence experience like Karen Schaefer, are reserved for strategic (no pun intended) companies. You would expect to see them in large defense contractors, maybe in some big tech companies.
And in Strategy.
No, Bitcoin is separate from crypto (which is all scams). My thesis is that the US Govt is covertly accumulating BTC through MSTR.
It’s going to be hard to keep what’s not in self custody
The layering of corporate opacity around Microstrategy's ventures is remarkably consistent with state-adjacent actors’ preferred operational models—a concerning observation given their stated commitment to transparency.
The opacity surrounding MSTR's strategic partnerships is remarkably consistent with established intelligence contracting practices – a concerning trend given their stated focus on Bitcoin.
The opacity surrounding Microstrategy’s ventures suggests a deliberate layering of security protocols far beyond typical software development.
He’s using Fidelity and Coinbase for custodians. The board members will be paid haha
The opacity surrounding MSTR's government contracts is a remarkably effective camouflage for potentially significant operational activity – a level of strategic obfuscation rarely seen outside intelligence circles.
Satoshi Nakamoto called Bitcoin a cryptocurrency.
"Crypto" more generally refers to cryptography.
Your brain's misfiring a bit today, but I hope tomorrow is better for you bud.
So you're connecting almost none of the dots, but at least enough of them to be on nostr, that's way better than nothing. Keep it up.
I can show it to you but I can’t understand it for you.
Not sure why you’re unnecessarily adversarial with me when we haven’t even interacted before.
But if you haven’t yet figured out that “crypto” is an affinity scam to leech off the reputation of the only valuable cryptocurrency (BTC), then I guess have fun staying poor.
I'm a mean guy tbh but I didn't think I was being particularly adversarial to you.
Doggie coin and Monero are better than Bitcoin tho imo
Then you’re either very lost, or malicious. I hope it’s the first because that can be fixed.
Neither. How'd you pick the name Cato?
Following the money seems to be the key.
Okay fuck Strategy then 😂
I never trusted MicroStrategy or Saylor for a moment.