Replies (42)
GM! 👀
GM 🫂☕✨
GM ☕️🧡
Love the rabbit hole 😄
Funny how the deeper you go, the more mythology, space missions, and internet theories all start blending together.
But honestly… whether people believe it or not, the Artemis program is still pushing real tech, real engineering, and real humans back toward the Moon after decades. That alone is pretty wild.
I think we did it this time. Very hard to fake those things these days
Giving the timing of the "mission" and the release of the Hail Mary movie, it seems more likely that it is fake and a distraction (it's not working). Is there independent ground-based video of Artemis coming around the moon?
GM 🤙☕
I’m pretty much 99% those astronaut are actors.
Maybe its the power of suggestion but the April 1st timing, and the simplicity of just “saying we did something” with a straight face knowing there’s no way for me to verify it and also understanding that the government doesn’t really care or respect the public in any meaningful way, makes me pretty certain its all bullshit.
And when people say there's too many people involved for it to be a lie, I wonder if they've heard of an NDA and how the govt can ruin your life for being a whistleblower.
I've also wondered if every single person in the control room wasn't a CIA asset. It's not as hard to get people to go along as most would think.
I don’t see why a room full of scientists couldn’t be fooled same as everyone.
Sounds trivial as well as necessary to extend the ruse to the support team.
Just Patch up the leaks as they come up.
GM! Artemis was really inspiring. Great pics taken with iPhones 17 Pro.
🤦
100% real and flawlessly executed mission to get all the unredacted Epstein files dropped on the moon. 🫡
Absolutely. Make them do real work. That is a compeltely different thing than staging a space show.
Good comeback.
Who knows
Hmm, mayve there should be one more option... without the "back".
So according to NASA it's a lie.
They did not land on the moon, they just did an orbit.
The mainstream media are lying saying that they landed on the moon but NASA are saying that the mainstream media are lying and that they did not land on the moon
it isn't a matter of "if every single person in the control room is a CIA asset it could be faked"
a mission like this takes thousand of people, international cooperation and years of planning.
AND there are thousand of people who know that and care deeply about it.
So you have to compromise SO MANY and fake SO MUCH shit for SO LONG that you might as well do it for real.
yeah, maybe you could pull it off (at massive expense)
and the big payoff is "looking like you're doing something"
no.
it's fucking ridiculous and you vastly underestimate the difficulty of faking it.
Do you really believe the USG has spend over 50 BILLION dollars developing the SLS program across 13 years to send 4 astro- err actors in orbit to post some fake pictures and tell a pretty story? What is the incentive? It makes absolutely zero sense. 🤦♂️
Thanks
Where is the independent ground based video showing the ship coming around the moon? Surely it exists. I cannot find any on youtube.
somehow its always those without photographic experience who doubt photos 🙄
why are you so sure it exists?
it might exist. but it requires a very skilled AND very lucky person who also has very expensive equipment.
that's just the state of technology.
oh I forgot
everyone with professional equipment and skills is a CIA asset
the reason "They" want Artemis II to happen is so they can militarize the moon before China does
Lucky person? Didn't we know exactly when they were coming around the moon? Isn't it reasonable to expect that someone on planet earth who doesn't work for the US govt would have the ability and equipment to watch for it? Isn't also reasonable that the US govt itself would have video documentation from planet earth? So far I've seen nothing. Seems fishy to me.
"lucky" as in you have to have clear undisturbed air between you and the object at exactly the correct time there is enough light reflecting off it.
also
someone on dark HALF of the planet
since they were only in close proximity of the moon for a few hours.
afaict you couldve pulled this off if you had a nice 12" telescope and good camera in a place FAR away from any light pollution AND clear skies somewhere in Europe or Africa on the night of April 6th.
but it's not going to be easy and its not suspicious that you can't easily find one.
anyway
its going to be a flash of light caught by an amateur
or it's going to be a institution that has a big fucking telescope
and you're not going to believe either way so....
forgot that this took place when the sun was on the opposite side of the earth from the moon (ie, full moon)
which means you're trying to photograph an extremely small dim object (spacecraft) next to an extremely large bright one (full moon)
dunno what kind of equipment would be required for this
but it's about the most difficult kind of shot to take and seems unlikely anyone with just regular optics could do it.
so in my inexpert opinion, an independent ground based video does not "surely exist."
Fascinating to see someone spend energy defending a belief as though it was a religion.
—Just wanting to be right.
No more proof than I have. Just certainty that they were right.
Ok. We'll go with your inexpert opinion then.
It's the certainty that drives me nuts. There're so many problems with the media NASA produces. But it's easier to just say, "nah, no ways these are lies" just because they want Star Wars to be true.
the difference is I actually know people who are engineers who work in aeronautics. I'm 2 or 3 degrees separated from people actually involved inthe technical details.
and if NASA was lying they would know. or at least have good reasons to be suspicious.
but have fun.
which of us actually looked into the details of what ground based verification would involve?
it definitely wasn't either of you.
but sure, I'm the one "defending a belief as though it was a religion "
ie with actual information about what verification would involve.
and yall haven't given the SLIGHTEST bit of energy into actually examining the details.
you're just sure its bullshit "cause reasons."
iow you're butthurt somebody lied to you this one time and therefore everything is sus.
put on your big boy pants and examine the incentives.
as opposed to your totally ignorant "seems suspicious" one 👍
or a CGI master.
"I'm sure there must be a independent ground-based video..."
tell me you know nothing about astrophotography without telling me
Tell me you don't think anyone on the planet is capable of filming the moon and activities around it without telling me.
bro I laid out the factors involved in filming the moon and activities around it.
you did fuck all.
lose me with the "oh I'm actually really informed about this stuff"
That should tell you how much I do or don't care about those conversation. 🤣
just stopped by to share an uninformed opinion that you don't actually care about and refuse to learn anything huh ?
👍
Calm your autism down. There's enough of that to go around on Nostr.
lol sorry
some people actually think critically about information and don't just look at the memes
