🏠🤯

@EVAN KALOUDIS in your humble opinion, LND or Core Lightning? I'm running Core, but seems like LND might have more functionality? Not really trying to run both

I prefer LND. It’s more feature rich paired with ZEUS. That being said, if you want BOLT 12, you have to go with CLN for now.

how is it more feature rich?

Support for external signers, hop picking, custom preimages, inbound fees, simple taproot chans, viewing pending channels, bumping onchain are all limited to LND right now. I also find the API endpoints to be more thoughtfully designed, in general

@Start9 💪😎👍 Recommend 100% Zeus support:

Start9 | Zeus

Start9 documentation for sovereign computing with StartOS

I've been trying Zeus forever, and been especially extensively testing it these last days. I'm sure it will be the bitcoiners' wallet of the future. The general trend is bullish, works better and better, faster each upadte, less bugs.... It's fullfiling the vision I had years ago on what should be a Bitcoin wallet, but that I could only dream of as a non dev guy. On-chain, LN, a bit of custody for small amount and async payment, privacy focused and the ability to automtically and smoothly switch to a non custodial channel when it's possible. The only competitors are Breez & Bitkit in this category. But Breez recently is a lot into the nodeless approach that I don't really appreciate because it's custodial. And Bitkit we'll see but Carvallo is so bearish on LN that I not bullish on Bitkit long term even if it's really promising. Anyway future is bright and I'm quite sure LN doomers are wrong on the long run.