Replies (36)
The truth hurts. Cope harder Coretard.
Its wild that compromised corrupeted Core devs attack Bitcoin from inside and are trying to turn it into a shitcoin.
View quoted note →Tick tok next block
😂
Feel free to skip the ad hominem and address how making it so large blobs of contiguous CSAM is not a significant risk to Bitcoin.
Appealing to authority is not a good reason to support spam. Learned nothing from Covid
Kratter is the one doing ad hominem my guy. The whole point is there isn’t a technical argument being put forth.
Spam apologists doing damage control lol
Everyday node runners are not buying what you’re pushing.
View quoted note →Hate to break it to you, already on chain, no new risk, and possible to do 400kb today.
Because the corrupted compromised Core devs allowed inscription spam by rejecting Luke's fix.
Hate to break it to you but its fixed in Bitcoin Knots.
That isn’t how bitcoin works, you should get a refund on your bitcoin university tuition.
So core never attacked Luke or anyone opposing them? Innocent angels, every one.
With corrupting and compromising Core devs? Its good you admit it.
We run Bitcoin Knots instead 🤙
Everyone sins, the point is those who don’t have a technical argument going into the personal lives of people they disagree with are wrong to do so.
Let me know if you want to bet of the efficacy of knots has on filtering transactions across the network.
We will see it in real time : ), no need to bet.
That's silly 😂
You sure you are not talking about yourself?
Kratter is a fucking legend, don't get it twisted.
lol it’s like we never saw Lopp’s article on Luke
You're proud that core is destroying any chance of preventing spam? Why does that seem to make you happy?
Szabo and Samson with technical merit presented their points in the current drama; why don’t you focus your energy there rather than ad hominem attacks.
Core didn’t give a damn about honest discussion — they just bulldozed ahead, slamming the commit and merge buttons like they are the only ones with a keyboard. Welcome to the nerdocracy, where dissent is a bug and control is a feature.
I just spent five days at my first Bitcoin conference,
@btcplusplus. There was essentially no mention of the price of Bitcoin, or about this filter podcaster thing, apart from one or two subtle jokes about it 🙂
Just pure signal at the conference
My point is that, from what I can see, most technical people just find this boring or silly
💯💯💯
Be interested in what this does to Ocean hash rate, I’m sure the intention was to attract more - not so sure that strategy is going to work.
All shitcoiners seem to be regular viewers of
@npub1s33s...252p. He must be doing something right.
View quoted note →its funny how core people keep thinking they are the technical ones, understanding everything.
while they are the bitcoin midwits, who can't comprehend shit, and make 0 technical sense.
even after hours of people explaining them how they make no sense.
High-level central bankers ‘day-trade’ economies into clownworld with their endless money-printing presses, hyperinflating us all while bailing out the suits. At least Kratter’s not crashing nations.
Technical merits? That’s your echo chamber’s blind spot, gossip goblin.
And now you’re begging for filters on Nostr? 😂🤣
😂
😂
Hubris maxin
It's wild how the same people who advocate for allowing child porn to be hosting on the blockchain think they are smarter than everyone else.
How the Fuck does making it more expensive to run nodes and potentially(inevitably) making it illegal to run nodes help anyone?
Anyone outside of the Bitcoin who want to prevent adoption or centralise control obviously, those people clearly benefit.
The technical argument :
Allowing spam on the blockchain makes it more expensive to run a node.
It also creates the potential for bad actors to share child abuse material malware and other harmful stuff which would make it illegal to run a bitcoin node in most places.
The Chian it's on is a fork....
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29187
Bitcoin Knots has fixed those issues.
View quoted note →
