jb55's avatar
jb55 _@jb55.com 8 months ago
anyone try grok4 yet? Looks like i have to pay $40/m to use and i donโ€™t want another ai subscription ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ I wish they would just let me pay per query with zaps

Replies (41)

I just checked it and it's listed but not up yet. But take it into account, you can pay anonymously with sats, even get a 5 or 10% bonus, no account needed, and you can choose from a lot of AI models.
They don't have api access and an equivalent of OpenAI's playground? That is how I use the GPTs paying per token without subscription.
Claude Code is a great agent for coding. The Claude Sonnet models are also superior to pair with your agent.
Give us a try as well! All the AI models in one place (including grok4) on a pay per use basis via sats!
lightning has limits based on blockspace but the way that it removes the need for onchain transactions means that its limits keep on receding into the future. i think eventually tech like Ark will come into play as well because it allows bulk transactions to happen without touching the ledger, which means it could become a means to move sats in and out of lightning without requiring onchain transactions to open and close channels. but the need is not pressing. the mempool tells the story.
stax's avatar
stax 8 months ago
๐Ÿซ‚ ๐ŸŽฏ๐Ÿ‘‹
I'm using the PPQ API via Goose, which actually works very well. (Strangely, it even works better than when I use the Anthropic API directly in Goose. I have no idea why that is.) I haven't looked at routstr more closely yet because it seemed complicated at first glance. Can I also work with Goose and API via routstr and use different models? I would really like to test that.
Yes i did . If we talked about price , i always think everything expensive , even for subscriptions for $5 cause they use our data in exchanged. I like deep seek, its free and cheap
โ†‘