Shouldn't Bitcoin Maximalists be upset that Saylor & Microstrategy are making it harder for us to stack as many sats?
Login to reply
Replies (55)
Apparently they just want their 0.009 BTC to be worth a few more hundred dollars
Or grateful for locking up so much of the supply that an eventual supply shock will grow each sats value against fiat.
I have been asking myself this question for quite a while now
Not going to be mad at what I can’t control. Game theory will play out no matter how much we hate it. Bitcoin is for your enemies.
No, because they were always going to be a part of this story. Bitcoin is for all
Getting “upset” at adoption outcomes of a permission-less global money is futile and a sign of stupidity.
Be stoic, stack your sats, hone your craft, stack memories and do things that you find meaningful. The rest be shitcoins.
I'm upset about promotimg custodial solutions
Everything divided by 21M includes enemies
I’d have thought they’d be more upset about the fact that he’s pushing for the proliferation of USDT while the US hoards bitcoin. Seems completely antithetical to the idea of hyperbitcoinization.
We are ! But I can't do anything about it.
something something Trojan Horse
We live in the gray friend. On one hand yes they have made it harder to stack on the other hand they’ve exponentially accelerated the value of the stacks you already have
Nah. He can buy as much as he wants. The reason he wants it is the value goes up forever, the reason we want it is the value goes up forever AND we can be self sovereign with self-custody.
Him buying more makes the price go up and makes it harder for everyone to buy including the wealthy. It also grows the value of current holders savings. Do not fear any accumulation of Bitcoin, welcome it. It is a good thing.
Have you listened to this one yet? Dude the end
View quoted note →
wait until Microstrategy appears on rectbot
someone was gonna do it
Be grateful he is the only corporation taking things seriously!
They’re making the mempool cheaper
We maxis already dumped 100% of our fiat on Bitcoin many many years ago, we already stacked.
As for all the cucks who decided to DCA and hold fiat, they are the ones asking for cheaper sats now
**Lump sum was the best and most logical decision, but we were made fun of.**
Yes. I feel like I’m the only one concerned. Last time I checked #bitcoin was supposed to a peer-to-peer electronic cash network without the need of a middle man. Not a financial instrument suits use to get rich by stripping it from everyone else.
Glad to know it’s not just me
Sincerely,
A Concerned Bitcoiner
No. Bitcoin is for everyone.
The market never upsets us.
I'm only upset that he might do a big mistake anytime and crash the entire market in minutes, this will be 10 times worst than FTX to recover.
This is the correct take
Be gentle with me 🥲 if I’m a cuck what are the rest of those billions or people 😂
Gentle?
I'm stealing this line IRL
Yeah as a blue collar worker it seems impossible to be a wholecoiner now, and most people I know think you must buy a whole one.
Just tell them you can buy 1014 sats for $1 rn. Incredibly cheap.
I am kinda upset about that. I'd be happier with slower price growth if it would be powered by the communities around the world that actually need it.
No, because Bitcoin is free and permission less system that let's everyone make their own decisions.
Of course not. Bitcoin is money for everyone. Your friends, your adversaries, and your enemies. Why would we be upset that people are using it?
Your supposition that a maximalist should have the opinion that "other people should not use bitcoin so it's cheaper for me to buy it" is to completely miss what Bitcoin maximalism means.
Yes. Why would someone want to play a game in which some guy has been hoarding all the tokens.
Dude using finance tricks with a public corporation is not “adoption” it’s an old man without ideas on how to run a business
Am I mad at you for owning sats i do not own?
Should a bitcoin maximalist be upset about being out-maxed? 😭
Yep. All it takes is 1 oopsie.
Sats will be sats, you can stack them, regardless of the FIAT price.
As long as Saylor keeps his Bitcoin with Coinbase, natural balance will be restored in the future.
Mixed feelings. Love seeing the price go up because of the sats I have. Hate seeing the price go up because of the sats I don’t have.
since bitcoin I am not really upset about anything. I am free to not give a damn
The questi0n is ? c0ntrols $aylor & micro$tratergy?
Don't worry about Saylor. He is drinking way too much coke. His bitkeys might be coming in handy soon.
I'm not upset. I heard Saylor on What Bitcoin Did and Robert Breedlove so it's not like he didn't tell anyone what he was up to.
In fact. I learned quite a bit from listening to him.
I'd much rather let the common plebs stack sats before any big corpos indirectly printing gov money to purchase BTC
No but I'm glad it took them 15 years to understand Bitcoin.
We all get the price we deserve right?
You weren’t waiting for them to ask for permission?
upset, no.
I was, so I got some shares. Now I’m happy when he is stacking.
Maybe you should have spent less time on eth
This was always going to happen a debt based system. 2000% increase in 5 years sounds like he has somewhat an idea.
There's been plenty of time.
I am!
No.