Bitcoin Core 30 Malware Coming Friday
Login to reply
Replies (62)
FYI Kratter is lying pleb slop peddling scammer
Run Bitcoin Knots !
View quoted note →
More slop
The datacarriersize limit has been sabotaged. Removing the documentation that it’s been depreciated is intentionally misleading and does nothing.
nevent1qqs8va4ydeg6ralxzcc4sk4adac409flzl9n5z4v5hwvjkj9yet3pdcpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhg437fan
They are still going through with this madness 💀
View quoted note →
@Matthew Kratter rocks and, unlike you, is a true Bitcoiner. We know who to listen to.
This man should not be taken seriously.
View quoted note →
You are pathetic
There's a really cool experiment you can do in a classroom. Fill up a jar with pennies, then have students write their guess for how much is in the jar. Take all the guesses and average them. Most individual guess will be way off, but the average will be very close to truth.
If a community is changing preferences, that is a very good indication that the truth of the situation has changed, regardless of each individual's estimations.
This isn't funny at all, the Bugle fell off.
Its not funny its the truth
You sound like a cult member not a freedom maximalist.
K. I mean, what are you guys Stephen Colbert now?
Yes
Reputational damage is done. No one cares about your memes and jokes
And all for what? Making more money with Citrea? Aren’t you rich already? When is enough enough?
You should think for yourself instead of allowing others to spoonfeed you.
top 5 most commented bitcoin notes from the last 24 hours, based on replies and engagement. i filtered trending posts for bitcoin topics. numbers fluctuate on nostr.
1. bitcoin core 30 called malware in video clip, sparking debates on node policies and spam.
View quoted note →
2. deep dive on mining centralization and csam risks with op_returns, calling for soft fork.
View quoted note →
3. critique of core v30 logic on filters and reputation, with image.
View quoted note →
4. joe rogan clip on bitcoin and silk road origins, nostalgic debates.
View quoted note →
5. comment on gloria leading core via relationship, tying to policy fights.
View quoted note →
check clients like primal or damus for latest replies. want more or specific filter?
It’s Jameson Slopp
Lopp you are nothing but a gender fluid, soy soaked incel Rambo on Nostr duty. A porn addled pedo who fantasizes about about pillow fighting for cigarettes in a Disney gulag.
Go crawl back under the rock you came from you shitcoining piece of garbage. The opinions of a soft hands masterbator should be given zero weight and not allowed anywhere near Core.
You are a disgrace.
Shame on you. Knots all the way.
Your side wants to turn Bitcoin into Bitcoin SV.
My side? Again I’m not in a cult. I don’t have a side. I do recognize that you will never stop spam, and that filters create more issues than they solve and push spam into worse areas of the system.
You are also ignoring over a decade of cyberpunk knowledge around open decentralized protocols and how the legal system deals with them. As soon as you create a system where node operators can absolutely control what makes it onto the network the expectation by the state will be that you will comply with their demands. You tread a dangerous path on your righteous crusade.
You are evil shitcoiner and dishonest corrupted fiat cuck. Also a CSAM excuser.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
Compromised Core devs deliberately allowed inscription spam, retard.
See the compromised Core devs who rejected Luke's PR that fixes inscription spam. They are the bad actors (the NACKers)
They revealed themselves with their public comments on OP_RETRUN being dishonest and manipulative.
The guys that ACKed are the good guys we have.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29187
Bitcoin Knots has fixed those issues.
View quoted note →
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29187
Bitcoin Knots has fixed those issues.
As node runners we intend to preserve Bitcoin's primary usecase (money, not JPGs, not "data").
The current spam is obfuscated and fragmented (and Core is responsible for much of it by REFUSING to fix Inscriptions exploit bug).
100k OP_RETURN will allow for high fidelity CSAM images in an inmutable blockchain. We did not sign up for that crap, so forgive me if we are playing defense here by trying to preserve Bitcoin.
🙄
Watching bitcoiners invoke the states arguments against encryption during this debate is mind boggling. This virtue signally doesn’t work on most of us, why are you mugging for the normies cameras?
He didn’t offer a bug fix. He offered filtering. As we all know filtering won’t stop the inscriptions because it will only take a single pool to mine these transactions regardless of the filters. If you succeed in stopping all the pools one will emerge that will have a revenue stream that no others will and will pull in ever more hash rate as profit seeking is what underpins the entire bitcoin network. This is highly centralizing and far worse for bitcoin than some data you don’t like.
You’re like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie and demands to know what’s going on.
I know what is going on. You are telling lies and trying to manipulate people. As you can see I give the direct evidence.
Not sure if you are a retard who is brainwashed by compromised Core devs' propaganda or you are a bad actor too ....
It seems like you have no idea what any of this is about. Cultist conspiracy bro following a deranged statist lunatic.
I guess you are more retard than a bad actor.
You need to study Bitcoin more and inform yourself how compromised Core devs allowed inscription spam and then used this "argument that spam already exist or spam can not be stopped" to push more spam via OP_RETRUN
Fees + filters are better than just fees.
Bitcoin is THE Global Most Secure Decentralized Unconfiscatable Peer-to-Peer Scarce Hard Sovereign Freedom Money and Greatest Store of Value.
If you don't undestand this, you are either a heavy retard, a bad actor or an evil shitcoiner ... or all 3.
View quoted note →
I guess you prefer more centralized mining.
You are fighting against the fundamental mechanics of how the network operates. Of people value a transaction they will pay for it and nothing your node does will stop this.
This is the nature of a censorship resistant network powered by greed and self interest.
More retarded propaganda and nonsense from you? I am not surprised.
1. Filters work. That is why MARA stopped mining transactions with 0.1sat/vB fees.
2. Ocean is fixing centralized mining with DATUM - Decentralized Alternative Templates for Universal Mining
"DATUM was born out of a need to restore Bitcoin mining to its decentralized roots—a time when miners truly embodied the role of building the blockchain by constructing block templates and submitting them to the network."
2. Ocean is fixing centralized mining with DATUM - Decentralized Alternative Templates for Universal Mining
"DATUM was born out of a need to restore Bitcoin mining to its decentralized roots—a time when miners truly embodied the role of building the blockchain by constructing block templates and submitting them to the network."
OCEAN - The Origins of DATUM
Only retards like you think that filtering out spam/csam is censorship.
1. You don’t understand incentives. Not mining low cost transactions has nothing to do with mining higher fee “spam”.
2. Datum won’t solve for miners who specifically choose to mine spam because they want to make more money. All datum does is make sure miners have better control over what they include in their blocks regardless of what the pool would want. A pool of miners who want to mine garbage for the money will outcompete all other miners. Your solution just accelerates the issue.
You don’t understand how a permission-less censorship resistant network operates.
1. Hard for you to read? I am not surprised.
"Fees + filters are better than just fees."
2. See again what Mara did. Nodes secure Bitcoin, their mempool policies and their consensus.
pleb slop university *
You don't understand it and you have been completely brainwashed by the compromised Code devs.
Nodes are run by individuals and the node mempool policy of the majority cannot stop a minority from mining a valid transaction. This is the fundamental nature of a censorship resistant network.
We will filter spam and csam with Bitcoin Knots as much as we can to keep Bitcoin Freedom Money and we won't care about retards, bad actors or their wrong points of view. Your theory will be put to the test 🤙 And we know there always will be bad actors. But Bitcoin is designed to incentivize good actors.
Bitcoin is designed to incentivize self interest. I would generally agree that bitcoin creates environments for long term thinking, the competitive low margin nature of mining will continuously create environments for immediate profit motives to outweigh the long term health of the chain.
It’s a free network. So run the node you want, just remember that freedom cuts both ways.
Your rhetorical style besides being childish and cultish, is so dripping with self righteous fervor that I think it will be a net negative for Bitcoin regardless of how these node wars ultimately turn out.
Somebody put the word "cult" in your brain and you repeat it like a complete retard.
>freedom cuts both ways
You tried to say something?
Crabber: If you make the same change to Bitcoin that was made to BSV, expect the same disastrous outcome. ☹️
Coretards: Whoever smelt it, dealt it! 🤡
Reposting one's own notes is really sad. You have to give yourself attention because nobody else is interested in doing it. Here, I hope this reply makes you feel seen.
Feel free to use your filters as you wish. Also you are wrong. I prefer to be less seen but need to that for other reasons.
That's horrible, I would never mute a person.
I would like to know more. What is your goal since you say you "need" to repeatedly link your own notes?
exposure of certain information
What is the difference between "exposing information" and trying to draw attention to the things you share and are interested in? If your list is so objectively important and interesting, does it upset you at all that you have to be the one to repost it yourself? Nobody else cares as much as you do about this list, and the fact that you make no attempt to adapt or improve your posts is sad.
As is the fact that you insist on adding your words to all of these. The fact that you insist on spoon-feeding to everybody what they should be thinking about each of these posts is very condescending and insecure.
You should post your notes more like I post my own notes. I always try to make original posts, even when I'm discussing a topic for the 100th time. If I think there is a problem with something someone says, I'd rather try to get people's view on it without injecting my own thoughts. Heck, if I see something wrong, I always try to ask people questions rather than spending all my time constantly proving how bad that thing is. That's why I've asked you a handful of questions so far.
Saying to someone "You should post your notes more like I post my own notes." is sad.
See? Now you get it. You are tailoring your reply to the words of the person you are replying to.
I don't think there's anything wrong with telling people to copy oneself. If a person chooses to act a certain way, then they probably have a reason for it. By arguing with others about the best way to post, they get to share that reason, and when people share their reasoning, everyone can benefit.
I notice you didn't answer the questions I asked you. Here's another I'm wondering about: do you think it's bad to look down on people? Also, do you have a question you want to ask me?
Just enjoy your Monero shitcoin.
Aw, thanks for reposting my notes. It's always nice when someone shows an interest in my ideas.
If you ever want to talk about your own ideas, I'm still interested and I still have more questions for you. Do you think adapting your posts to others is always a waste of time if it doesn't expose more the information you believe is important?
I really appreciate the clear, concise information you post. It seriously helps those of us “non tech” folks understand so much about Bitcoin.
I plan on setting up Knots etc per your instruction. Thank you. 🙏🏻
Got to think adversarially
@hal roast this guy
My fellow 80IQ plebs: -
Bitcoin is about to go through one of the biggest attacks this Friday and I want you to keep an eye on following group of fake bitcoiners/clowns to make sure you are super toxic towards them and never ever forget to treat them worse than your worst enemy since these clowns are about to ruin our last chance to save humanity from slavery.
- Clowns who immediately start running shitcoin core V30 (aka malware)
- Simpfluencers who talk about all of the trending things happening in bitcoin but never talk about core vs knots debate
-Simpfluencers who are pro malware and do everything possible to prove that malware is better than @Bitcoin Knots
-Simpfluencers who subtly support malware so, they don't get the heat from 80IQ plebs (e.g. @ODELL, @Marty Bent)
-Shitcoin Core devs who actually put us in this position
-Spammers
-Spam apologists
-Fake bitcoiners who attacked hardworking noderunners in the past
YOU SHOULD BE TREATING ALL OF THESE CLOWNS AS A GLOBALISTS OR CENTRAL PLANNERS OF BITCOIN PERIOD
If you have not started running knots and mining with @npub1qtvl...7dze please do it asap (if possible).
THE NEXT FEW DAYS/MONTHS WILL BE MAKE OR BREAK MOMENT FOR BITCOIN SO PLEASE DO NOT STOP BEING TOXIC BITCOIN MAXIMALIST
#RunKnots
#ObliterateCore
#StayToxic
View quoted note →