Telegram quietly updates FAQ, removing:
"All Telegram chats and group chats are private amongst their participants. We do not process any requests related to them."
Login to reply
Replies (50)
Telegram is bad for you
Telegram quietly updates FAQ, removing:
"All Telegram chats and group chats are private amongst their participants. We do not process any requests related to them."
View quoted note →
That was always a bullshit claim, no?
Since group chats were never claimed to be e2ee.
Why do they have to remove it? Why not simply lie about it?
remnants of decency?
#telegram #nost #plebchain
Telegram quietly updates FAQ, removing:
"All Telegram chats and group chats are private amongst their participants. We do not process any requests related to them."
View quoted note →
You should get anyone you know to get a npub. It's getting more and more obvious by the day! #grownostr
Telegram quietly updates FAQ, removing:
"All Telegram chats and group chats are private amongst their participants. We do not process any requests related to them."
View quoted note →
Nostr now 👏👏👏
What if the whole “intent” behind this whole thing is to drive people away from using telegram, and trusting it as a platform?
Undermine public trust…
What if they can’t read messages on there.
So they undermine people trust in it, driving them towards platforms they can monitor…
That’s just a conspiracy theory tho… however if you think about it, doesn’t it make sense?
🔥
Some other social network that shall be nameless (let’s call it network x) is reporting this sentence has simply moved to a more relevant place.
Telegram
Telegram FAQ
This FAQ provides answers to basic questions about Telegram.
Check out our Advanced FAQ for more technical information.…
Telegram was never private.
Telegram quietly updates FAQ, removing:
"All Telegram chats and group chats are private amongst their participants. We do not process any requests related to them."
View quoted note →
Simplex is the only private chat, all others are fake.
Telegram quietly updates FAQ, removing:
"All Telegram chats and group chats are private amongst their participants. We do not process any requests related to them."
View quoted note →
Surprise! #Durov does not want to go to jail.
Surprise!
Telegram was never private.
View quoted note →
I have a growing list of concerns with Telegram, but let's strive to be fair & balanced in our reporting. In the main, this change looks to be part of a broader reorganization of the FAQ to incorporate more EU-specific citations. As others have pointed out, the phrase in question is still present; it's just been moved to a different heading.
Telegram
Telegram FAQ
This FAQ provides answers to basic questions about Telegram.
Check out our Advanced FAQ for more technical information.…
Yea but they often declined government requests. Seems like now they will bend over backwards for them.
Having a known CEO is an easy point of failure. No one wants to go to jail. Satoshi did it the right way 🙏
GM, from wss://relay.primal.net
Good pickup did not see that thanks
Good pickup. I did not see that, thanks
Sure, he bought himself his freedom again.
It will probably go away quietly now.
Good time to push full decentralized solution with protected people ids ?
🎯💯
Telegram will start moderating private chats after CEO’s arrest
#SimpleX
https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/5/24237254/telegram-pavel-durov-arrest-private-chats-moderation-policy-change
View quoted note →
Exactly.
That's messed up. But its not like I ever trusted telegram anyway
It is a system of consent. People have to hand it over.
Sempre avisei que Telegrama é SCAM.
Não entendo tanta gente naquela porcaria.
Telegram quietly updates FAQ, removing:
"All Telegram chats and group chats are private amongst their participants. We do not process any requests related to them."
View quoted note →
Its almost if "Trusted Third Parties are Security Holes"
Trusted Third Parties are Security Holes | Satoshi Nakamoto Institute
Advancing and preserving bitcoin knowledge
Got to love companies that create a monopoly for their service and then update their terms of service that would keep most of their users away from their product. How is this legal or moral?
Censorship resistance is hard
View quoted note →
They've banned themselves from half the planet. At this point I'm sure they do care a bit about being banned.
kinda ironic basically just conceding that they don't make any effort to protect the privacy of group chats tho, it's gonna impact their userbase... probably more people leave without that guarantee, i'm sure maybe 5-10% of telegram users care about this... one of my friends already moved to Session a few months back because the red flags were piling up on telegram
Concerning, But I never used it anyway
Pavel has bended the knee.
Pavel has bended the knee.
View quoted note →
Trusting Telegram is like trusting a cop.
This was clearly a blackmail scheme, and a ritual on Durov's part.
signal is the best everyday simple messaging app.
View quoted note →
yep true
For the FBI/MI5/CIA agents monitoring this telegram channel, i declare that i have no idea how i got here. Probably through forced invite. I do not condone with or encourage of any illegal activities carried out within this channel. Illegal activities are frowned upon and are not endorsed by anyone in this channel.
Coincidência? Acho que não....
What a joke
Meant to attach this.
View quoted note →
Ya estoy en @0xchat y me parece genial
Acredito que o Telegram esteja com os dias contados para os brasileiros que buscam privacidade.
A gente está assistindo a ofensiva dos estados contra a privacidade dos seus respectivos cidadãos. Brasil não vai ser uma exceção.
View quoted note →