In August 2025, Google announced that starting next year, it will no longer be possible to develop apps for the Android platform without first registering centrally with Google. This registration will involve: - Paying a fee to Google - Agreeing to Google’s Terms and Conditions - Providing government identification - Uploading evidence of an app’s private signing key - Listing all current and future application identifiers

Replies (29)

Don't beg them. Fuck them. Build the alternatives.
Zapstore's avatar Zapstore
In August 2025, Google announced that starting next year, it will no longer be possible to develop apps for the Android platform without first registering centrally with Google. This registration will involve: - Paying a fee to Google - Agreeing to Google’s Terms and Conditions - Providing government identification - Uploading evidence of an app’s private signing key - Listing all current and future application identifiers
View quoted note →
we need more devices with graphene >_< they can't make people sign these things for buying a pixel tho, so there's still a hole in this thing. they really can't ever completely close up custom rom dev because AOSP devs build many parts they depend on. i just wish there was an alternative to buying from the pigs themselves instead, i should be able to run it at least on samsung, motorola maybe. nope.
.'s avatar
. 6 months ago
This is why i'm bullish on nostr + shakespeare + routstr
JB's avatar
JB 6 months ago
Is the Linux phone still a thing? I have some research to start.
Tony Acid 's avatar
Tony Acid 6 months ago
my plan to tackle this is to have two phones: 1) regular android phone only with the apps that require Google Play Store (banking apps, Gmaps etc.) 2) degoogled phone (either graphene or LineageOS without Play Store), with zap store and other APKs that are not currently on Play Store
REDACTED's avatar
REDACTED 6 months ago
Yeah… that’s not not happening on REDACTED’s watch 😈
Peace K 🪙's avatar
Peace K 🪙 6 months ago
Most people will feel that it's too hard / expensive. Privacy awareness is not binary. It's a spectrum. Some people see privacy as super important and will go to great lengths to keep it. Some don't care about it at all and will not suffer any inconvenience for the sake of privacy. Most people are somewhere in the middle. Which means the easier it is to gain privacy, the more people will have it. A better solution will be a VM inside graphenos tor android apps. If it's easy to set up, people will go for it.
Default avatar
Vendetta 6 months ago
I hope this will also help to jump start the Linux phone era.
Will we be able to use those Google play apk's on GrapheneOS? I think so, because of backward compatibility. But with the Google play Integrity API, the writing is on the wall that their ultimate goal is to keep the apps for Google-authorised builds of Android only. Fuck em, they can keep their spyware apps
Why two phones? You can do all that with Graphene (minus apps that specifically use the Play Integrity API) in separate/private profiles
You can totally use Google Play Services on a different profile on the same GrapheneOS device. Banking apps no idea, people still use banks? 😉 why not use a computer or web version for that?
poolrooms's avatar
poolrooms 5 months ago
My bank (and presumably others) requires their app with location services enabled in order to use Zelle, which is the least shitty way I've found to send fiat to people. 😮‍💨