Bought a cheap #microscope because of rumors that #ivermectin damages #fertility. Nutted on some slides. My results suggest the rumors are bullshit. There were some days between the last dose & the examined nutt, so I guess it's still possible that there could be some temporary impact, but it ain't serious.
Plus farmers use the stuff all the time, if it impacted fertility they would know.
#covid #health
Replies (28)
this note deserves a nutzap
My daughter has my old microscope and now I want to try this but that feels very very wrong.
In a way this is kind of a dick pic
I have not seen any reputable data that ivermectin reduces fertility, that being said, the fact that you have some swimmers under a scope doesnβt mean anything. You would need to count them on and off ivermectin. Low fertility is considered less than 15 million per ml.
suppression of ivermectin started b4 jab bs*/*access in France waz otc for yearz but then_______..........0 except thru bs & prescription hope/NA/
setupz/contractz b4 event*/* endemnity/insurance etc. .. ... ....
Nut is spelled with 2 tts?
Clear logic
Well, I can't count to 15 million & there is a pretty impressive amount of depth to the small amount that is there. There is also like zero way to control how much the slides compress the sample & so estimating the amount I can even view would just be a joke.
Given the treatment of covid & the PCR tests, most establishment science is also a joke, so I am fairly satisfied with my rough examination in this particular instance.
You can just verify things
It will damage fertility long term in many
Yeah um I'm pretty sure the issues arise from people taking the dosage written on the bottle meant for cattle or sheep instead of taking the dosage meant for people.
Our bodies are different, different tolerances for different chemicals.
A cow or sheep can handle a lot more of some things than people, and vice versa.
Seek advice from medical experts about dosages before consuming livestock medication
It's people medicine & the medical system poisons people all the time.
Also the fertility issue is the reason that farmers wear gloves when they are administering these medications.
Fertility issues in humans from exposure to ivermectin has been known about for a long time.
My grandfather who never wore gloves when mixing fertilisers, pesticides, etc. or administering medications to livestock was full of cancer by his 60s.
So personally I don't fertility should even be your main concern.
I figure the fun version of butt is spelled with 2, so the fun version of nutt should be too
OK I want a microscope now.
I will watch later, but they demonized & censored all sorts of people for recommending ivermectin -- among other things which also have good track records. I suspect it is more likely that they have paid a few people off after the fact to spread this garbage about a generic product that no one can control. Hard to create another pandemic if a bunch of people are already using things that will keep them from getting sick. I could be wrong, but that's where I'm at.
From the window, to the slides. All my sperms gone ride. Awww skeet skeet mfer, aww skeet skeet gottdam.
No signs of malaria on those fellas on the park and slide anywhere. Nice work, give your wrist a rest now tho aye. π
Lol, that is not the case for most of the farmers I know. Gloves are rarely a major concern, they are around literal shit all the time, most of them are old & tougher than nails. One of them used the injectable ivermectin he was giving to the cows on himself, said it worked great.
In my experience, both the horse paste & the people pills will knock out covid or the flu. Seems odd that something which appears to do nothing but improve health is somehow doing some sort of secret damage... Sounds kinda like how dumbasses talk about steak & eggs. "Sure you lost weight & got stronger, but you're gonna have a heart attack" ππ
Ivermectin is a routine part of my current health routine. Sadly I have to purchase it outside the US... land of the free, right.
π€£
Our local pharmacy / homeopathic place dispenses it. I'm in Tennessee.
You can just nut on stuff...
But anyway, to get any result you would have to watch counts, motility, etc, right?
On Twitter you get to see Saylors dumb AI tweets
On nostr you can a fellow plebs sperm through a microscope
We are not the same
The most nostr post ever. Have a look at Jeff's swimmers.
View quoted note βGreat news... I wish more stares allowed this.
My guess would be that labs would measure volume of the original sample, then use something like a centrifuge to isolate and concentrate the swimmers. Then sample the concentration and dilute it with a specific volume of fluid, to decrease the density to something that is finitely countable. Then count, and multiply by the appropriate volumes to get to a count that is average per ml of the sample.
