Haters say Trump doesn't understand inflation, but this is obviously fake news.
Just look at the man. Dude gilds damn near every physical possession he owns.
MSN
Login to reply
Replies (67)
Anyone want to watch lopp admit he’s a fucking sellout piece of shit?
Enjoy ☕️
oh cool. came for the revolution, stayed for the edge case(s)
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Jameson Slopp, an Ethereum shitcoiner and a bad actor who is trying to turn Bitcoin into Ethereum
View quoted note →
First his evil actions lead turning Bitcoin into a shitcoin and csam cesspool.
Then running node becomes legally challenging.
And he tells you to run it over Tor.
Jameson Slopp the disgusting shitcoiner and bad actor.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
Nah … I’d rather just watch you troll them 😂😂😂
"It's just an extreme edge case, bro"
- Jameson Lopp
Why does the bitcoin relay network need to be used as a content distribution platform? If Lopp wants to move large chunks of data, there's this thing called TCP.
Lopp him off - going down in history as the nigger traitor of the cypherpunk freedom movement.
Mark it.
Information theory. Sorry you can't handle reality.
Dalit's such as yourself have NEVER determined what "reality" is. And you never will.
you will die and be judged though. and before that you will be understood for the traitor to freedom you are.
enjoy!
Why the fuck are you laughing.
What does Greedlove's bum bum check say about it though?
Greedlove. That’s funny! Ask his OnlyFans girlfriend.
I’ll watch, truth doesn’t need yelling, it just needs verification. ☕️
I laugh at retards
What's really going on with bitcoin, Citrea & Peter Theil 🤔
Cheap. You're the guy in the video arguing against yourself.
So how much are Blackrock paying you to sell out your humanity and facilitate the extreme edge case of pedophiles that want to distribute content over the Btc blockchain when so many other blockchains already exist.
They already got bcsv for that, it's already full of childporn.
You're only going to create another fork like y'all did last time.
Because he wants to destroy the credibility of Bitcoin.
So laughing at yourself?
Of course you love Trump
Doesn't matter because you get nothing done.
@BushRat read through all the replies and you'll be fully up to speed.
And like I said it's nothing to worry about, node runners can see what's happening, Bitcoin has already been through this before, start stacking sats now before core forces the blockchain to fork, after the blockchain forks the price of Btc is going to back up.
Nice one
He checked with the Core team, they said we are all retarded
Checkmate!!
You will find yourself very alone in life sir.
Money is not everything.
Perverting Bitcoin for profit will come back to haunt you.
I almost feel sorry for you.
Almost
🌻
I post verified reports of wrench attacks because I maintain the only comprehensive archive of them. I track them because my job for the past decade has literally been Bitcoin self custody security.
Its because of his company Casa which is happily working with Ethereum shitcoins as well.
But yes he is additionally amplifying the effect. He is evil shitcoiner.
The reason you're so afraid of this is because its how you think.
Its the same reason liars are so hard to lie to.
They suspect everyone is like they are themselves.
You are a demon.
You just don't know it.
Thankyou for leading me here I'll have a read.
I did watch some of the Bitcoin University guys videos yesterday.
Absolutely nothing about any of it makes any sense to me.
That's not very nice
So you're trying to change Bitcoin to be an nft instead of money?
I'm so confused. Arent nfts a scam?
Isn't there a new block every 10 minutes?
Who's impatient enough that they can't wait 10 minutes?
I'm not trying to be nice
No.
That's subjective and can be debated ad nauseam.
It can be strawman’d
Anything can be.
I'm not following the actual conversation but I have to say that this meme is fucking excellent and I'm stealing it.
Cheap again. Picking out the easy notes to reply to. You're not obligated to reply. But if you're going to, try replying to the matter at hand. Not that I have high expectations.
We can try here if the matter at hand isn't clear for you.
Does it live up to your responsibility as a core developer to advocate for - and push through - a highly controversial change to bitcoin core, if the usecase for that change is an extreme edge case?
I'm not a Core developer, I'm co-founder and Chief Security Officer of a self custody company.
I have the same rights and responsibilities as any Bitcoin user to advocate for whatever I damn well please.
Thinking that Jameson Lopp is a core developer shows you are clueless.
Go flash your rights somewhere else, whats within your rights isn't always whats the right thing to do.
Again cheap answers. Well, "answers".
It's a yes or no question, but avoidance is what's keeping your own sanity alive.
Don't answer me, i have zero expectations. Answer yourself though!!
Does it live up to your responsibility to advocate for a change in bitcoin core that serves - in your own damn words - an extreme edge case?
I actually thought Lopp was a core contributor. I disagree that being mistaken on that voids my point in this thread.
Completely irrelevant to the points being made.
He’s a highly influential personality in the space.
He absolutely contributes time, money and influence on the topic at hand.
It’s just another dishonest take and more evidence of his dishonest character.
It voids any contributions you have on the topic. It shows you have not done *any* homework and have no idea.
Yes, it does. You have to be extremely deep in the weeds to understand highly nuanced issues such as this.
And Again
Precision is important.
A "Core Developer" is someone who consistently contributes to Core, generally as their primary occupation.
A "Core Contributor" is anyone who has ever made a code contribution to the repository.
I average one trivial code contribution per year. I'm a contributor but by no means a developer.
shouldn't we consider every case, no matter how "extreme edge" it is?
And I am by no means deeply into the weeds of the op_return issue.
I do however understand that we need to be EXTREMELY careful when making changes to a bitcoin implementation that is so widely used -- AND I also understand that supporting bitcoin core changes to help "extreme edge cases", given the above point of extreme care, just doesn't compute.
So, based on your own words in video above - I disagree with you, in that it lives up to your responsibility as whatever person in bitcoin you are (of higher than average importance) to support such a change.
Remember! My disagreement here is based 👏 on 👏 your 👏 own 👏 words 👏 PLUS the idea that changes to bitcoin core should be taken with EXTREME CARE.
He is a core contributor
He isn't but he has huge influence on the current core devs. He is commenting on changes. See here, after the backlash from Plebs, Schmidty decided to revert the deprecation of datacarrier size configuration option to make the malware Core v30 more acceptable. Slopp of course immediately signaled that he is fine with that becuase defaults are what matters. Majority of Core devs and just VC and shitcoiners cucks.
View quoted note →
You seem like a bad actor, a disgusting one.
He isn't but he has huge influence on the current core devs. He is commenting on changes. See here, after the backlash from Plebs, Schmidty decided to revert the deprecation of datacarrier size configuration option to make the malware Core v30 more acceptable. Slopp of course immediately signaled that he is fine with that becuase defaults are what matters. Majority of Core devs and just VC and shitcoiners cucks.
View quoted note →
Your disagreement is noted and hereby discarded since you clearly can't comprehend how it's possible to be quite careful with software changes while handling edge cases.
Merit and logic is gone from Core. Majority of Core devs are compromised and are just cucks to shitcoiners and VCs like Jameson Lopp.
We have seen Core's so called "arguments" and we have seen their actions.
Compromised Core devs rejected the fix for inscriptions pretending it has been "controversial PR".
Compromised Core dev pushed OP_RETURN as if it was not controversial.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
Says the man positioned to profit from the changes.
—BITCOIN IS NOT YOURS TO FUCK WITH—
Do you even hear yourself?
The Beard!
If you develop an open source calculator and make "software changes" that carefully consider edge cases, sure.
When talking about the future of money, i think throwing that in under trivial "software changes" depicts your disrespect for the project you're influencing changes on.
Its simply too risky to implement changes, so we avoid it unless the benefits are extremely obvious and the risks have been studied deeply.
Do you run a node or not?
After learning how Bitcoin actually works now I will only take opinions of people who run their own nodes seriously.
Everyone else is just talking shit.
Show us your node running on core30 or are you a hypocrite?
What kind of ignorant bot are you?
I've been maintaining my own fork of Bitcoin Core for a decade and published innumerable tweets and essays about running nodes.
Look at the release notes for v30 and you'll find my name.
X (formerly Twitter)
Jameson Lopp (@lopp) on X
The Bitcoin Core v30 release is the result of code contributions from 101 different individuals.
I myself slipped in a small networking change to ...
Citrea and Peter Thiel are shitcoiners and scammers who try to turn Bitcoin into Ethereum like shitcoin to profit from their scam.
It seems like it. But what's their endgame? Do they actually want bitcoin to be used (whilst they profit) or do they want to destroy it?
They just want to control it.
Its destructive to their business model.
Who needs a bank when you can send money anywhere without them?
—They want to co-opt it and incorporate it into their existing system.
🧡👊🏻🍻
In my opinion their first priority is to profit from their scam and their second priority is to hurt Bitcoin as much as they can.
This is what every shitcoin like Ethereum, Solana, XRP is doing. First they scam the retards with their slavery centralized shitcoins (rug pulls, pump and dumps, inflation, coins created out of thin air and so on) and then they all want to flip Bitcoin.
See how the shitcoin scammers are telling this in plain text. You can find many more similar videos (link is in the below note).
See how Citrea is serving directly the major shitcoiners and trying to turn Bitcoin into Ethereum like shitcoin.
Shitcoiners are after Bitcoin's liquidity of +$2 Trillion.
Bitcoin fam, we have bigger problem. Run your Bitcoin Knots nodes.
Huge financial interests are sharpening their knifes for Bitcoin flesh.
Charles Hoskinson is evil shitcoiner and always up for a scam but his honesty in that interview was appretiated.
1. Charles Hoskinson is apprently now a "Bitcoin Maximalist" - a Solana scammer will always be a scammer, he seeks his next scam - he is the person who said Cardano shitcoin will become the biggest cryptocurrency in the world and will flip Bitcoin
2. He is talking about zero-knowledge proofs, the one that the Citrea bad actor is implementing - which were experimented on Ethereum since 2020, Lopp's favourite shitcoin
3. He is talking about Bitcoin being the favorite Wall Street financial asset and mentioning Black Rock, Chase and Goldman
4. He is talking about Bitcoin DEFI
5. Bitcoin is like virgin territory for the shitcoiners, meaning they want to tap the 2 Trillion liquidity.
... and more shit like Web3, putting everything on the Blockchain (heard that from some devs?),
admited they bet wrong with smart contracts with Cardano :) ... and shitcoin airdrops at the end (of course created out of thin air) ... fucking scammer
Charles Hoskinson on Cardano’s Greatest Challenge, Why Ethereum Will Fail and Fixing U.S. Healthcare
View quoted note →
Very based! Followed!