BLUE CHECKS WASTING AIR ARGUING ABOUT SATS WHILE THE SUITS WERE LIKE FUCK IT LETS JUST MAKE EACH SHARE A RANDOM FUCKING NUMBER LMFAO

Replies (39)

BTC Freedom's avatar
BTC Freedom 1 year ago
People like to complicate things, sometimes to steal from others. Keep it simple self custody and stay humble 🫑
Excellent counter! Ask any ETF holder "how much corn they have" and they won't know. Next year ask the same question (you, know, fees) and they'll be wrong again. The only number they care about is fiat go up.
SatsMan's avatar
SatsMan 1 year ago
πŸ’―πŸŽ―πŸ™ŒπŸ«‘πŸ§‘πŸ’œ
A.A.Ron's avatar
A.A.Ron 1 year ago
ETFs can't track the price of bitcoin long term because they take 0.15%-1.5% off the top annually in management fees.
Thurzt's avatar
Thurzt 1 year ago
Are Orange Checks the new blue checks?
Is it though? People with a fidelity account can just move whatever percentage of their portfolio to bitcoin ETFs. No new exchange accounts, no learning about self custody. I'm not arguing for ETFs, they're stupid, but honestly they are much easier for a lot of people.
The management fees actually had decent competition. IBIT wanted to charge much more but were forced through competition to come in at 0.12%. Which for small to medium holders is much cheaper than an unchained or casa assisted custody plan. Other ETFs came in with even lower fees I believe.
Grandpa, that isn't "freedom money". You get arrested because everyone can see where you use it. 99% normal people don't care about a bisq, and they would still go after the donation recipients anyway. Monero fixes that. image
Just like any bitcoiner around here anyway. They're just forex and stock junkies that get all happy and advertise around here: "I paid for my coffee with Blackrock ETFs" Hell would break loose if they'd discover you can actually mine crypto from their own laptops. But they aren't really interested on that, at all.
Jose Sammut's avatar
Jose Sammut 1 year ago
You can't because you have management fees reducing the BTC / share every year. Rather just make it a random number.
Mindaugas's avatar
Mindaugas 1 year ago
It’s not random - those suits are somewhat smart. They made it cheap for a regular Joe to buy β€œbitcoin”.
btcsammy's avatar
btcsammy 1 year ago
Only for techies or btc nerds. The rest of the people have no idea what they’re doing.. and most too lazy to learn
Def. i see that coming tooπŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯qqq / fasb / rate cut / 7-10bn convertible with 0 interest / stock split / sp500. Did i miss something?🀯
Sure, I just don't see the point. You left X & you are on Nostr but keep posting about X. If you want to keep posting about X & its users that's entirely up to you, just because you are not being hypocritical seems somewhat irrelevant, it's that you left it & constantly talk about it like it's an ex-girlfriend. Why use Nostr to keep posting about X? Let it go πŸ‘
0.12% per year would mean 1% diff every 8 years. SPY has been able to keep it's price within a few % of 1/10 of SPX for +20 years and they even have the handling of dividends to manage for the difference. Every 10 years you can do a small stock split to rebalance if needed.
You always have a counterparty. With self-custody you become the counterparty 😁 For most boomers that is worse than Charles Schwab. Just check the Sparrow Telegram Support group and assess the risk of losing coins in self-custody. Self-custody is always better for ideological reasons (starve the beast) but isn't always a lower risk of losing your coins, e.g. doesn't even know what seed words are.
I mean, there's management fees. They could have made them a eound number but after one period the fees would have broken that parity anyway.
Default avatar
Roboto 1 year ago
I guess it depends on the environment to whether or not people should selfcustody and in the current environment I would self custody some or all of my bitcoin
↑