Replies (53)

This is very believable But Don’t trust; verify Why can’t we just call these people out with receipts? Are we trying to be Cathie’s friend?
I don't understand how Saylor can threaten Ark. What leverage/power does he have over them?
twentyone's avatar
twentyone 1 year ago
Wait is this crypto Twitter or is this Nostr? I’m getting confused
pam's avatar
pam 1 year ago
Sad to see people who think they can go around controlling bitcoin companies and bitcoin development like puppeteers. Don’t let them win.
Toby McMann's avatar
Toby McMann 1 year ago
ODELL's goal is freedom tech. Others' goal largely stops at NGU. The difference shows up in the degree to which folks are willing to accept capture. No judgements, as bitcoin is for everyone, and the truth is revealed.
Would ARK be giving funds directly to developers or going through an intermediary like Brink?
Default avatar
nobody 1 year ago
"it is just three months from Bitcoin Miami energy conference to the Bitcoin Nashville conference
BTC-Satanist's avatar
BTC-Satanist 1 year ago
what power would Saylor bring to bear over Ark ? Did the other two ETFs tell Saylor to GFY ? I'm in an unpopular camp. Unfavorable to even soft forks , favorable to the development of L2s like LN and Liquid and whatever else.
Default avatar
RomanHodl 1 year ago
the way ARK works (not only in btc btw), is they know fuck all about the stuff they invest in. they just invest in narratives (which is why they are "big on eth" and shitcoins btw) and for evey narrative they have their narrative guy. saylor is their btc guy, they probably just ask him "what should we do here?" for every strategic btc decision.