I think #Bitcoin Core has lost the plot with it's handling of OP_RETURN.
And I think you'd have to be bonkers to run Bitcoin Knots.
My 2 sats.
Login to reply
Replies (29)
I'm in the same frame of mind. Just wont update
bonkers to run or not to run?
This is pretty much where I’m at as well lol
Spam is bad; filters, even though imperfect, have a positive effect ie. keep the protocol usable (see email)
It’s clear conversation is needed but that seems utterly impossible at this point it’s pure ego. Sad.
To run
Yep 🤣
Agree
Yep it's a royal shit show.
View quoted note →
i tried knots but i am now back to core.
there are jepg's in the timechain as we speak!
X (formerly Twitter)
Paul Sztorc (@Truthcoin) on X
Here is a count of all JPEGs -- with OP Return **excluded**
This entire saga gets stranger by the day. Adam Back on Twitter just now:
"Bitcoin is owned by humanity, the protocol developers are stewards, and need consensus from users to change it materially. bitcoin is about money, spam has no place in the timechain. what defaults the bitcoin core project puts in the reference client matter in this"
View quoted note →
X (formerly Twitter)
Adam Back (@adam3us) on X
Bitcoin is owned by humanity, the protocol developers are stewards, and need consensus from users to change it materially. bitcoin is about money, ...
Couldn't make up my mind, so switched to mining XRP instead how bad could it be?
😏
You’d have to be bonkers not to run Knots at this point.
View quoted note →
Do you even run a node?
Yes
you mean Core?
coretards might wanna ddos, but there is a setting on knots that helps with that.
i think the question should be "what are the dangers of running core".
bitcoin is money, money is energy.
bitcoin can cut the energy streams flowing to them.
that's why protecting bitcoin against attacks is important.
that's why knots is important.
you can't win by battles, or letting people know. you have to cut the energy streams of fiat.
core still can't detect inscriptions and include them in the data size limit.
btw anyone here seeing this:
core still can't detect inscriptions and include them in the data size limit.
they refused to PR 3 years ago. that's why utxo size exploded. knots has been able to detect inscriptions and include them in the data size limit for the past 3 years.
Run Bitcoin Knots
Aaaaaaand Luke is going to hard fork.
I'm sticking with #Bitcoin, the longest chain, aka $BTC.
Good luck with $BCH2 or whatever it ends up being called. 🤣
View quoted note →
The Rage
LEAKED: Luke Dashjr Plans Hardfork To “Save Bitcoin”
Text messages shared with The Rage show that the Knots maintainer is considering a hardfork to implement a trusted multisig committee that can retr...
Same. Core needs to have a code of ethics about bitcoin.
It should be something like :
- no change in supply
- no pushing controversial defaults
- no moderating discussions
stuff like that
You still alive? 😂
#core28 ?
So basically... "I see a problem, and I don't want the solution".
Thank goodness thats that settled then.
You will eventually have to. Core is actively working to “force” users to update.
still kickin' 🤙🏻