"She knows too much" -the antagonist

Fucking crazy to steal my quotes to push your bullshit relay policy and misapply it and then not even let me speak on behalf of the other female in the room who was raising valid points

🫂

They were practically sucking Michael Saylor off from afar

What was your question?

How the expect to enforce standardness on the longest chain for over 100 years? The answer is they can’t but they don’t want to answer that because they’ll admit that we’re splitting into two factions white market money and black market money which is fine and fair but there are reasons the suits can’t admit that

Because the inscriptions make the money more traceable? Which, if that’s what you mean makes sats not so fungible. I apologize, I’m not nearly as technically proficient as you.

No it’s okay it’s more actually a historical thing… the thing is Luke is actually right. The problem is so are Eric and Amir. We actually need RDTS in case governments try to attack bitcoin like they tried on BSV but we have to keep the black market chain the longest for the future when nation states aren’t actually the way we dictate relay policy (standardness)

Thank you for dropping knowledge. I really do appreciate you taking the time. I will research your response until I understand it completely. I am trying to learn as fast as I can. I’ve only been in bitcoin for 14 months.

I appreciate you being here. I really am a very nice person. It’s very difficult for me to step into this role. I don’t even really want to be here and I am struggling with it but there are very few people left from my section of the Bitcoin world because everyone is either dead or worse. Shadow miners are not a chill group but if we don’t have shadow miners Bitcoin will fail. I’m sure of it.

But @npub1zq37...fyd3 we do need an RDTS chain in case we have to absorb through a mass activation in case there’s a state attack on bitcoin… at which point all the public companies will be forced to go onto the RDTS chain And the shadow miners will stay on the consensus chain… but anyone on the consensus valid chain will likely be forced to mine underground. I don’t want to be the one to say this and I hope it doesn’t play out like this but this administration is NOT a friend of bitcoin. They are Solana shills and Solana was Always designed to be an attack on btc

Yeah, I can tell you’re not in bitcoin for boats and hoes. You want to fix the money so we can fix the world. People are just so easily compromised. It’s fucking sad the lack of character in most people. I’m putting hash power behind my bip 110 node and wish that weight on your shoulders feels lighter OG. The goal should be to separate money from state and nothing less.

To be fair, Trump said he wants the US to be the CrYpTo capital of the world. He says the quiet part out loud. Fuck the orange man.

Haha boats and hoes actually made me laugh and I really needed that so thank you 🫂 and yes I really really care that my son has a future and I really am scared that if we don’t fix the money we don’t have a world for our kids to inherit

Hahaha yeah president pump as @npub1az9x...m8y8 likes to call him which always makes me laugh

YES, IT’S FOR THE NEXT GENERATION AND WORTH FIGHTING FOR. ITS WORTH DYING FOR. OUR CHILDREN ARE BEING BORN INTO INVISIBLE SHACKLES.

Followed

Yes exactly and also I am paying for some of my own past sins. I always try to be fully transparent and there are bridges that I built. At the time I thought it was good for Bitcoin because I didn’t realize that these things would ever escape the hacker community. I didn’t anticipate the scale of computers and AI so I thought we would be able to gatekeep things that would never be public and I thought gatekeeping meant it wouldn’t turn into Solana world and I was wrong. I was wrong to hack on bridges. I was wrong to support that even amongst us, i knew enough about AI even in 2019 to not have an excuse for understanding that there was a chance the things we were building would be weopanized against us and they are and that is why now I have to be honest- because I know what’s coming because I built some of it

Well, you can’t see into the future. That only makes you human. I’ve done bad things unknowingly with good intentions. That doesn’t make you a bad person. I have faith that money can still be separated from state. This is a war. Losing one, or even multiple battles doesn’t mean defeat. We just need to be relentless in our pursuit of privacy, and more importantly, sovereignty. I always tell people, self custody is the fucking revolution. I may not know much, but I know that.

The good folks at Bitcoin Today run a spaces M-F on X 10:30 12:30 Come in. Say your piece Yes, Fred K is a bit slippery

We should build one on Nostr ! Is there an app that can live stream audio only and have guests speak? I’ve been wanting to start a radio show but more like x spaces. If there isn’t one already that could be a fun build

I’ll show up

Can’t do X…

I'm curious what your take on it not actually being sufficient to keep data off chain is. As I understand it, it may make arbitrary data a bit more expensive, and break it up into pieces, but at the end of the day, Peter Todd's stunt putting the whole text of BIP-444 in a compliant transaction seemed sufficient to me to indicate that any hope that it'd be sufficient to keep arbitrary data off chain from a determined attacker is in vain. And meanwhile, to offset the additional costs to the attacker come the additional load from the expanded UTXO set. If data being broken into pieces or otherwise obscured is enough to absolve any moral or legal responsibilities, I move to reopen the case of anyone who was found guilty for operating criminal enterprises over Tor, because that data being encrypted surely means it doesn't count -- right? This is all aside from the minimal hash power behind the fork, which is another matter that I think makes it DOA. But if there's a reason I should be lamenting this that I'm missing I'd love to hear your take.

It'd be quite sweet to see the functionality built out into Whitenoise at some point, but definitely isn't there yet as it is very early days.

Sounds entirely on brand. Dude's a tradfi bro. He does seem to be "Bitcoin first" but not Bitcoin only, and as far as I can tell it's 100% based upon the fact that it will outperform in the market. Here for the fiat.

No you’re right, it won’t keep the data off chain but it at least will give a plausible deniability defense… we cannot keep spam off bitcoin, Proof of Work is the best way we have to combat spam The RDTS distinction is purely a linguistic defense not a technical one

Feel free to run the fork and put hash power behind it. I live my values, regardless of whether I’m on the winning team or not. There’s a big difference between a fragmented CSAM image that is spread across multiple transactions that requires one to have knowledge of and special software to see and the same image in one OP Return, easily visible. That gives the state legal precedent to shut down the network.

I understand now. If we hard fork, I might finally mine a block. 🤣

Don’t be afraid to step into the ring & mix it up in the marketplace of ideas Shit, I even have a Bluesky account

I don’t like algorithmic social media. I have a chronological feed on NOSTR and I don’t want it any other way.

If we’re gonna win money the fight is ‘everywhere’. X is better than Walter Cronkite broadcast world Baby steps to self-sovereignty

For sure. We all have our role to play. My autistic ass would be more of a detriment than help on centralized social media. It’s best I stay here and play with the other autists.