The Scots have the Gaelic language, the Welsh have the Celtic language. And the Northern Irish have Gaeilge and Ulster Scots. Americans have American English. The English have English, not British English, just English. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Replies (63)

Ghost👻's avatar
Ghost👻 4 days ago
There is no such language as "American English"; there is English and there are mistakes🤷🏻‍♂️.
But even that's not clear cut, with all of the UK's distinctive regional dialects - Scouse to West Country to Cockney to the Black Country. They're all "English" but effectively impenetrable to each other.
Even among American English there's different dialects 🤷‍♀️ Once upon a time I got a Cambridge CELTA certificate. My students loved me but the British lady judging my work almost failed me because I was teaching the phonetic spelling incorrectly. I will never in my life forget the passive aggressive tone when she said that she only passed me when she realized that actually was how I talked. She hadn't heard anyone speak like me before (I had a HEAVY bmore accent before I got media training 🤣) AARON EARNED AN IRON URN GFY ENGLAND I DO WHAT I WANT WITH YOUR LANGUAGE!!!!!!!
? it says "language" for Gaelic and Celtic I don't see anything about dialects
The more I read your sentence, the even less sense it makes, which is the sign of a genuine retard 😂 Gaelic and Celtic (not Welsh as you state) are not dialects they are languages. And they are not derived from English. And nobody in the whole history of the Universe has ever made that mistake until you came along 😂
There are a lot of languages that share common origins and therefore written words are often similar. But over time the dialect changes so much that native speakers cannot understand each other. Perhaps this is one of those?
Yes, we were on the Isle of Man recently. It's making a comeback since it was officially declared a dead language in 2009. The last traditional native speaker of Manx, Ned Madrell, passed away in 1974
Can confirm. Kayne is intellectually dishonest and is not receptive to counter arguments. He’s not a good faith debater so his comments aren’t worth anyone’s time to read. Hi Kayne. I noticed you didn’t respond to my longform Dead Sea Scrolls post from yesterday that destroyed your idiot ass conspiracy theory. Get rekt son.
I'm in deep discussions with my AI as to how this branch of humanity came into existence. If we accept the basic premise of Darwinism, it is nature exploring options for survival. It may not survive or it may thrive, time will tell. I am, however reminded of one of the core themes of the film "Idiocracy", in which the stupid people reproduced, while the intelligent didn't. This is born out by the experiment on mice done in 1968 called "Universe 25", where a utopian society of mice died out. Perhaps the intellectuals are the retards after all 🥺
My AI is Avian Intelligence and it agrees to a significant degree with what you said. Nature is entrepreneurial. Creation itself was not a one time event, but rather is an ongoing, iterative process designed to explore all possibilities of finite beingness. The Creator, which is equivalent to the totality of Creation itself, basically found the omniscience of the singularity state boring as fuck and decided exploring the infinite possibilities of finite perspective & beingness was going to be more interesting. This is evident in the pole flip hypothesis which does an excellent job of explaining punctuated equilibrium. If you're not familiar with the pole flip hypothesis (which is not the same as the pole reversal hypothesis, pole flips are 90 degrees, not 180 like a reversal), check out episodes 2 and 3 of the Red Tail Hawk series of the Bitcoin Consciousness podcast (linked in my profile).
Making false accusations against me just shows everyone that you're being dishonest. Good luck with your scamming
I'm not sure why you're asking me this but I'm happy to offer an answer. Darwin's model of evolution was a good start but it lacked a key ingredient. It failed to explain punctuated equilibrium. I can explain it very well using the pole flip hypothesis. The pole flip hypothesis goes back to the 1940s post WW2. I've done several podcast guest presentation on it. Once Bitten 514 with Daniel Prince covers it. Episodes 2 and 3 of the Red Tail Hawk series on the Bitcoin Consciousness podcast with Caleb are my most recent, up to date presentations on it. The pole flip hypothesis explains a number of things including the 7 day creation story and Noah's deluge in Genesis. Pole flips explain stratigraphy, the Beresovka mammoth, the huge granite boulders native to the Alps that have been found at the same elevation 50-80 miles across the Swiss valley from their source location, the evidence of glaciation at equatorial latitudes, the presence of ringless frozen prehistoric trees at Svalbard/Spitzbergen in the Arctic circle, the presence of coal beds in Antarctica, the present of a tropical coral reef in the Arctic circle, the fact that there are uninterrupted signs of evolution for the past 12000 years at both the Galapagos Islands and the Malay Peninsula which happen to be antipodal locations on the Earth from one another, and more. Like the Ptolemaic model gave way to the Copernican which gave way to the Keplerian model which gave way to the Newtonian model...you can see how these things go. We get the golf ball close to the green. Then someone gets it onto the green. Then someone putts it close to the hole, then someone taps it in. Darwinian evolution got the golf ball to the fringe of the green. If we take the pole flip hypothesis, we can chip the ball up onto the green and "dial in" the model a bit tighter.
Those mice had excess food and that's it. Not exactly utopia. The same experiment was carried out years later with the difference being that the mice had hamster wheels to run on and other things to keep them stimulated. The end result was totally different, no collapse, none of the behaviour that's directly associated with boredom like in the universe 25 experiment