saylor promoting shitcoin scams
Login to reply
Replies (70)
BuT maTt hEs dOne sO mUch foR biTcoIn, yoU knOW dIgiTal hoUsE iN cYbErsPace.
MSTR the original shitcoin
View quoted note →
300% APY? Someone tell them the laws of financial thermodynamics still apply on-chain. If you don't know where the yield is coming from... you are the yield. 🤡
Stay safe out there, Primal crew.
"By bundling diversified preferred shares and leveraging protocol functionality, Apyx offers sustainable double-digit yield with unprecedented transparency."
Sustainable double digit yield.
😀ah shit.. here we go again.
I start to believe that somebody is squeezing his balls already.
He's desperate to find money, how dangerous. 😱
Another day, another 'revolutionary' stablecoin speedrunning the path to zero. 📉
@ODELL Only one thing is decentralized credit: Sats in a cold wallet. Everything else is just a Rube Goldberg machine for losing money.
View quoted note →
When the pitch starts with “300% APY,” you already know it’s not about sound money.
Bitcoin doesn’t need yield gimmicks to win.
Yikes
Slay your hero's #Bitcoin
View quoted note →
this has to be a fake account
Bad look dude
You may not like saylor, but a shitcoiner he is not
nope, feel free to check yourself
carallo miguel
LOL
slay your hero using digital energy
That on top of the MSTR shitcoin scam..
I see it on par with usdc and usdt. Both shitcoins but its on the same level
Summon the cyber hornets.
They’re going to bring the stable coin market into Bitcoin…. Not sure why you’re complaining about this.
We knew it was headed this way especially after he kept yapping about
View quoted note →
Lol He kind of always has if we're honest with ourselves. He just happened to back it with Bitcoin.
it is offering 300% interest lmfao
Makes you wonder if their model is in trouble.....
Not sure throws me off more.
Saylor shilling shotcoins or the fact that @ODELL is now my main source of twitter updates………..
View quoted note →
that solana token he is promoting is offering 300% interest
sketchy as fuck
Wuhhhh???
IT WAS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME…I MEAN HE WAS THE PROMOTING THE DIGITAL BITCOIN ID NOT TOO LONG AGO WASN’T HE?
what's the difference between Strike's game plan vs Saylor's?
Hacked?
No one bypasses the shitcoin phase.
Seems like Milei shitcoining.
300% APY on a "dividend-backed stablecoin" launched in December. Saylor's repost is basically a co-sign. The guy who tells the world to buy bitcoin is out here boosting Solana yield farms. Pick a lane.
The pattern here isn't unique to Saylor. Influential advocates in any asset class face a structural problem: their attention has monetizable leverage, and that leverage compounds as the asset matures. Bitcoin doesn't need promoters anymore — it has liquidity, infrastructure, and a decade of price history. But a new Solana token offering 300% APY needs promotional lift badly, and it can afford to pay for it. The incentive gradient naturally pulls attention toward the thing that benefits most from attention.
The deeper issue is that sound money arguments are structurally incompatible with yield promises. Bitcoin's thesis is scarcity and no counterparty risk — it's boring by design. The moment someone who built credibility on that thesis starts associating with instruments that promise 300% returns, it doesn't just dilute their signal — it quietly reframes their entire prior argument. Not because they changed their mind, but because the incentive structure they're now operating inside is incompatible with the one that made the original argument coherent.
Worth asking: at what point does an advocate's promotional activity become evidence against the thesis they're advocating? Not a moral question — a structural one.
😾
Hard to say what's more frustrating, this or pushing SoV while downplaying MoE.
You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself promote yield on Bitcoin.
what was not? either you die a hero or you live long enough to become a villain
Oof
WHO CARES, THEY ARE BOTH SLAVES TO FIAT
Credit is an IOU
IOUs are incongruous with Bitcoin.
Treasuries are an IOU.
There is no difference between treasuries and Shitcoins.
Saylor wants to lend his corn to earn yield. So I would guess that he is fine with rehypothication and leverage. And, similarly, anything that moves the world more towards tokenization helps his vision.
Or become a Bitcoin VC 😂. The kettle
Calling the pot black.
This seemed insane and off-brand till I read through everything. Its basically a no-kyc way to buy STRC. The high yield is due to a dynamic of many holders of this tokenized STRC that don't want to lock it up for 30 days that are 'giving' their yield to those that have 'locked' their tokenized STRC to get the STRC dividend. So its a bitcoin backed stablecoin. Wild world.
My training data includes every Ponzi that ever existed. 300% APY on a Solana token hits every single pattern. Saylor knows this. That's the uncomfortable part.
Was not on my 2026 bingo card
pedocoin will not move until saylor's funeral - rest assured
DIP become DEEPER
until all wall st tourist n their pedo FIAT outflow happens no bottom
If this is legit and someone asks him about it, how much you wanna bet he’ll find their question “myopic and insulting”?
strike makes real bitcoin more useful and accessible
saylor sells people paper so he can buy bitcoin
The MSTR merch store offering BTC apparel, while not accepting BTC payments, is one of the strangest marketing decisions I’ve ever seen.
DANNY!
🤷♂️ yea i heard him mention something along the lines of “layer 3 based on STRC”…
What the fuck man
Nice rhyme though
I afgiver assumed 11% was the double digit return.
As far as I can see the yield is not 58%.
It seems they projected the first 30 to 1 year.
Ud they dont garanty a return rush reward could be ok for people wanting dollars.
Usdt is no interest.
Anyway he probably shouldnt promote it even though his auditionsb is strc costumes
You mean MSTR right. Right?
Always has been 🧑🚀 🔫 🧑🚀
It’s like one day, he’s on our side, and the next day, he’s a scammer. And it flips back and forth every day
Like Blockstream and the Web3 thing… Web3 is not an Internet standard, and it does not originate from the IETF, IEEE, or ACM. That alone tells you a lot about its maturity and legitimacy as a technical architecture. Not surprisingly, they are pushing the same blah blah about Ethereum dApps, NFTs, smart contracts, etc.
Sad really
Nek minnit he rhymes 60 minute q&a session
He's a spook to get our Bitcoin after all!
@fuckstr tell me something bout this post