By Dr. Jack Kruse on X:
On day before my talk
@BTC Prague on the Fabians inside the Gates I was asked by Natalie Brunell to do a podcast with her. At the end of it she asked me what I was going to do and say. I told her to come to the talk and hear it live.
During the podcast she asked me was this an existential challenge to Bitcoin. I told her I would answer that in my talk.
I was just informed that after my presentation at
@BTC Prague Natalie wants to censor my podcast and not release it. I believe all the Plebs should be made aware of this development.
Bitcoin media should not be in the business of sheltering their wedding guests from criticisms. Sunshine is the best disinfectant for the the node running Plebs around the globe.
So in the first every Bitcoin morbidity & mortality conference in Prague, where I labeled 5 of 6 "Bitcoiners," and I use that term lightly, FRAUDS, Natalie Brunell has decided to censor what I told her 24 hours before that talk. Ironically, her team never reached out to me, she relayed the message to the meeting organizers who contacted me this AM about this.
For those of you who did not go to Prague, from the stage Natalie got a big call out on her question from the stage to me about the "existential Bitcoin Landauer attack" brought about by those "6 Bitcoiners". When the talk goes live you'll hear it and she'll have to explain her reasoning to you. For me, she has lost all face validity as Bitcoin media.
I have a clean copy of the Prague talk, so if it gets edited I will be releasing it, FYI. I was wearing my own mic. I knew this talk would be censored in some way so I was ready for it. 7 of my slides also never got shown. I have been reasured that this was a technical issue, so I will not say more about it. Plebs should be away that the media heads inside of Bitcoin are also working with Fabians attempting to ossify the base chain of Bitcoin with spam.
We all must be aware that we have a Trojan horse loaded with people we should no longer trust at our gates, and I strongly suggest we not open the door before we employ BIP-110 to limit the pathologic cloud surrounding them at the entrance.
The primary purpose of Bitcoin media regarding transparency is to hold power to account, foster an informed citizenry, and maintain public trust through clear disclosures and open communication. The media facilitates transparency in two distinct ways: the media’s transparency toward the public and the media acting as an agent of transparency for society.
To combat misinformation and build trust, media & their associated organizations apply transparency to their own operations by employing the following:
1. Editorial Clarity: Distinguishing facts from opinions and explaining reporting methods.
Funding & Ownership Disclosure: Revealing financial backers, corporate ownership, and potential conflicts of interest so audiences can weigh potential biases.
Radical Transparency: Openly revealing how news is gathered to let audiences independently assess the reliability of a story.
As far as I am concerned, based on those three characteristics, Brunell is now part of the same problem now because of this censorship. I spread missing information that Plebs who run nodes need. I find it more than ironic her first released podcast was with a past wedding guest. Is the ethos in Bitcoin, "Don't Trust, verify, or do certain Bitcoiner's get a pass now? Apparently Bitcoin is not for everyone as Brunell's twitter page says in the header. It is just for those who she protects.
Replies (62)
Hey
@nat brunell is this true? Are you censoring Uncle Jack?
View quoted note →Wow… suspicions confirmed
That's very sad
i'm not surprised at all ..
Dayem...they got her too. How sad. This is good though. Thanks for being a real bitcoiner. Shit starting to feel good again.
💯💯💯
This would be known as the great bitcoin purge.
What a strange tweet
It gets even stranger.
Although, I have to add that I think Jack Kruse is cooked, and quite arrogant.
Now we are talking!!!
He’s arrogant as most medical doctors, but I don’t think he’s cooked. Mind you he said Adam Back was cooked before the Epstein files even dropped.
She can do whatever she wants with her podcast. Kruze is being weird about it
Are you cooked as well? Sure looks like it.
I’m doing great thanks. Just had a swim now about to go back to work.
And no, my work doesn’t involve mindless conspiratorial bollocks
Hmm, a while ago I unfollowed you based on a hunch. Guess my hunch was right.
“mindless conspiratorial bollocks” to discredit a valid concern is something straight out of the CIA textbook. So you say there’s nothing sus about Natalie withholding the interview that was initiated by her?
Duh. Of course she can. She just did. It‘s about what it means.
@nat brunell is a FRAUD and enemy to Bitcoin
Fuck off. Censorship of ideas is proof she’s a fraud. That fiat bullshit doesn’t belong inside bitcoin. She’s being pressured to censor from her sponsors and it’s proof she’s a fraud and compromised.
These companies funding podcasters are a major attack vector on the network.
dr jack not using nostr makes little sense
calm down and think clearly.
Her podcast is her podcast. If she doesn’t want to post something that’s her decision.
That’s not “censorship”
Are you inferring that I work for the cia?
She can do whatever she wants with an interview - it doesn’t make it censorship.
If I cut parts of an interview for a documentary or straight up remove their comments or simply don’t post - which I’ve done loads - it isn’t censoring.
Obviously that’s not true. 😅 or else she wouldn’t be forced to censor it.
It’s called corporate capture. Most of these dumbass podcasters think that getting “Bitcoin companies” to pay them is a good idea.
IT IS THE WORST IDEA.
it kills the ability for them to make a real honest discussion on the topic. They self censor, stay away from topics that would be harmful to the corp, and in Natalie’s case, backtrack on episodes and agreements with guests and censor with request from sponsors.
You didn’t answer my question.
I agree
I thought you were smarter Joe.
View quoted note →Happy to be “dumb” on this
Being dumb on this means you’re being dumb on a lot of other things.
🤡
Women are not revolutionaries, that's as far as I'll go with that here.
I watched Kruse's speech published on YouTube by btcprague. He said repeatedly he would name names and reveal them during the speech. That never happened I'm the video. It seemed some parts were clipped. Either they censored him or he is a giant dicktease.
I think he identified them pretty clearly although not by name. I only have doubts about one of the six figures.
I don't know all the figures enough to read between the lines
Take it with a grain of salt, these are my best guesses:
View quoted note →@Simon Dixon is indirectly calling out
@jack mallers today in response to Kruse's
@BTC Prague speech on Sunday, which is a little surprising to me, but the context is being against the entire idea of leaning on your stack for loans. Maybe Kruse is including him?
now what did i do lol
i swear i’ve about had it with being a public bitcoiner
You got in bed with Lutnick and Cantor is what you did 😂
There are lots of public bitcoiners with good social capital.
Maybe you will know what Dixon is talking about in his video
just watch her latest interview with Saylor where she, once again, affirmatively, and repulsively i might add, grins throughout the ENTIRE fucking interview like some kind of a canine humping a stuffed animal.
this isnt a journalist. this isnt a good interviewer...
its some eye candy shoved to the front of the line by #bigbitcoin
what a stupid fucking mindless monicker.
Not defending Jack. I think he was based until he got involved in the suitcoiner treasury and credit shit. But I’m pretty sure Dr. Kruse was talking about Saylor, not Jack.
Joe Glow
its always a red flag when these cunts disparage conspiracy theories when you consider that #bitcoin was designed explicitely as a counterattack to one of the biggest conspiracies of all fucking time - the creation of the fed ...
gfy joe
join the club, asslicker.
Not gonna commit my time to watching spooks, but to any reader - feel free to verify this.
I'm sure he was talking about Saylor, but he might be at the top of the list. It's unlikely Kruse was including Mallers, but Dixon explicitly named Mallers as sus because of the partnerships. Personally I'm glad Jack is taking on the role of being fiat bridge and bitcoin services. Nobody else is going to be breaking his back to perform and improve the way Jack does. Ita not like he's saying "buy my shitcoins" or "buy my security because it's just as good as bitcoin" or "I'll never sell my sats" or some other bullshit.
WTF is the point of money if you can never sell it? That's like collecting your grandmothes jewelery or garages full of your grandads tractors for sentimental. Not a store of value, that's a store of sentiment. Bitcoin is made to be spent. Its useless if its never spent. That is half of its core function. The other half is its digital transportability. That is what gives it its value.
I get it, don't sell your sats when you can spend your dollars first. No duh.
Sell your chairs before you sell your bitcoin. Fine, if you insist.
Store your money in bitcoin instead of dollars. Well of course.
Buy bitcoin and never sell it? Maybe not ALL of it, but that's not reasonable. The reason you have money in the first place is to be a "delay channel" for your wealth.
So, yes sell your bitcoin, but as little as possible and never sell your "nest egg". That's not just a rule for bitcoin, that's always been a rule for savings.
Can you give me the timestamp from this pod where he talks about this?
1:40:19
🙏
Can someone tell me what this guy is talking about? I have like zero patience for long-winded posts claiming to have important information that is being censored by "_THEM_" but which doesn't actually say the thing.
Tauri, if you know something then just say it, there's no censorship here, but this 40,000 word post doesn't say anything other than saying Brunell is apparently censoring your podcast with her? Im sure part of it is is a failure on my part of reading comprehension, but are you saying you did a pod with her and she isn't releasing it? Ok, well if that's the case, just say whatever you want to say here and people can read it.
Prague censored you too? Ok, well post it here. Saying you will release something in the future if you believe you are going to be censored is like an announcement of an announcement, which just seems like engagement bait to me.
View quoted note →Never trusted her, tbh.
never trusted this woman,
just felt it in the way she does her makeup and what/how she shares on nostr. remind you of anyone else nostriches? …
truth ALWAYS comes to light. let time do its thang
View quoted note →What the fuck are you talking about?
So lots of bla bla but you did not tell us what you told Brunell that she censored. Tell us then, whats all this about?
Bring IT 💪
TY!
For the truth shall you AND us free!
I will add. I have run live events for 2 decades. Of course depending on how its run, technical issues have never shown up IN someones presentation in my 1000+ events.
Just sayin'
That’s not my take, I just reposted it.
Sounds like coming soon in pod with Svanholm
Always thought the same
