jack's avatar
jack 2 years ago
I hope someday reposts and zaps completely replace the need for “likes”/🤙🏼. Reposts and zaps are true value exchange…and have a real cost: your reputation or money. Likes are superficial and exist only to inform an algorithm. Relevance algorithms have their place, but they are best informed by a truly costly action.

Replies (164)

Also, it's likely only a matter of time before bots would swarm the "likes" if it had signifigance in terms of an algorithm.
Why should there be stakes for every interaction? There's enough of that in the offline world, that it feels appropriate that at least online simple & undecorated actions matter enough to maybe have broader consequences. One can acknowledge & appreciate without having to pass value judgements on one's reputation or wallet 👀 And there are certainly occassions where it's practically offensive to zap/repost. Like when someone shared a pic of their kid playing or their grandma? Zapping seems absurd(to me at least) & reposting would be trespassing on their privacy. Replying is an option but Like is just a shortcut for avoiding such a quagmire of "Nice"/"Great" replies 🤷‍♀️ Maybe there will be a need for unzappable posts ? 😬
Previously I thought having multiple reaction buttons would be great. Like Facebook. But now I think Zap nand Repost would be better. Also, I think the option of reposting with a quote is necessary. Like the Twitter's Quote Tweet option. I don't know if it's already available but I can't find the option of reposting with my own quote with the clients I am using. If I had that option, I would surely repost this post with this comment as my Quote.
Thanks for the feedback. It seems there are some issues with zaps across different clients and wallets. I have tried zapping myself and it works fine from the Blixt wallet using Amethyst client. Tips seem to be working as well.
Default avatar
. 2 years ago
Well said 💜❤🧡
#[0] I don't think zaps are going to replace likes, unless you're also going to filter zaps by your web of trust. Otherwise it's easy to boost your content with fake zaps.
RamenCoffee's avatar
RamenCoffee 2 years ago
I mean..... you can zap yourself. The poster is the only one with the real signal.
True. Likes impose such low costs it’s not really a big factor. They inform about positiv / negative attitude towards content though. Ratio comment / likes etc. That’s their most useful function to me personally
Agred, now that we have Zaps on Nostr, I'm pretty sure no client should be giving notifications when someone likes a post. Excited that we can finally move past the "like" paradigm from Facebook/Twitter/etc. and build something unique thanks to Bitcoin! #[0]
Yes! Likes are obsolete. A necessary solution at the time because micro-payments weren't possible (yet), but now they simply bring more noise and attack vectors. Zaps are the way forward. #[0]
If you believe in something, or say something, be willing to sign your name to it. I learned that from you, YOU KNOW WHO. Wakanda forever.
In the words of Tim Berners-Lee: “So do you think the Web is basically been a good idea or a bad one? (…) So what is made of the Web is up to us. You, me, and everyone else. Here is my hope. The Web is a tool for communicating. With the Web, you can find out what other people mean. You can find out where they are coming from. The Web can help people understand each other. Think about most of the bad things that have happened between people in your life. Maybe most of them come down to one person not understanding another. Even wars. Let's use the web to create neat new exciting things. Let's use the Web to help people understand each other.”
Likes/upvotes are one of the major problems with social media. They incentivize people to not say what they think, but what they (subconsciously) think will get them the most likes (endorphins). It creates a hive-mind mentality where all social interactions degenerate towards the lowest common denominator. Zaps are even worse, since in addition to dopamine, people are also being incentivized with actual money. It's the worst aspect of social media, but on steroids.
Unironically, no likes/zaps/upvotes at all, where the important thing is discourse, not farming dopamine. But that way of doing things isn't as profitable, harder to apply an algorithm to.
That's what I try to use this profile for. No zaps, just free speech with free thinkers. I'll adopt the discipline of refraining from likes as well.
Kek, I mean, I don't really mind likes that much. It's just the zaps thing that bothers me, since you're monetizing people's views.
But yeah, it's probably something I definitely need to work on more discipline with too, since it's a easy trap to fall into.
There was a thing called eugenics but someone decided that was racist.
It's funny to imagine if people behaved in real life like they do on Nostr. They'd be constantly throwing pennies back and forth at each other 🤣
I remember a few years ago when I still worked at a university, a bunch of the students were using "hashtag" in normal speaking conversation. Like they'd make a normal statement and then append "hashtag yolo, hashtag love" to the end of it.
I lean toward disagreeing with this. I think there is still a place for the 'like' – it is distinctive in its own right (wrong as it may often seem and do). In my mind, our actions in this digital social sphere map as thus… 'reply' furthers discourse/dialogue (cost: time) 'repost' communicates agreement/solidarity (cost: reputation) 'like' signals approval/consent (cost: none) 'zap' identifies/recognizes value (cost: money) Our correspondence, kinship, and connection (whether IRL or not), need not always cost. We ought leave some space for the informality.
Bitcoin is directly traceable to on and off ramps, your transfer to a different wallet doesn’t change that.
"It's like telling them I saw you. You're not alone". That matters. Being able to communicate in that "form" is a reaction. Maybe this isn't black or white? :)
We don't know who needs what. We don't have to know either. Maybe what they need at that moment is to be seen. Maybe not. : ) We can carry some things like the postman. Not knowing what's inside. It's kind of like zapathon. Very nice for me. I'm reading the global. And I'm distributing "likes". Sometimes hugs :))
Do you have a strategy around managing fake zaps? Or zap automation? Or I’ll zap your posts 10,000 sats, if you zap mine back 10,000? At present zaps seem like value transfer, but once abused more widely, they are not exactly a measure of value.
🌹's avatar
🌹 2 years ago
No wonder my Twitter TL was so messed up
🌹's avatar
🌹 2 years ago
Had several abrupt shifts in policy . Lol!
Yes, not exclusively in your note, in general it is starting to sound too many times. While it is inevitable that some app will develop it, the fundamental question is, which one will be the first? I have my bet made 😅 On the other hand, nice talking to you 💜
Ugly Dumpling's avatar
Ugly Dumpling 2 years ago
Are there options to switch off aspects of algos, so people can tailor them to their own preferences?
Just got back from Hawaii, now I understand the power in the 🤙
I am not convinced because many social networks users don’t want to actively participate. But it depends of the way you present it. Swipe left and right could be a good solution like in TikTok.
Maybe you’re stuck in twitter mode. Likes are to tell people you like their content. How the system uses it is a different story.
It is not a fake account, he has removed the nip05 verification, I don't know exactly why. Just without nip05 it leads one to think that it is a fake account.
I agree,zaps and likes are a different thing,a like proves you have seen ir read, or find funny. Maybe it is just a comment or a meme. A zap is a note of value and a different thing. And I am pleased people enjoys so much to give. And please let is not forget the value of comments and feedback that prove we do not echo in silence. Nostr is a social network after all. I am looking forward true organic engagement and new friends.
Likes are the simplest social signal you can send. Our problem is that Big Social has bent social signals into algorithms optimized for engagement. The social signals themselves are not evil. I think money is a worse proxy for value than simple signals like “approval” that humans have been using forever. Some people are poor and will be under-represented. Some people are rich and can send huge zaps. I’m not interested in the market value of peoples notes. I’m interested in learning from them, being entertained, keeping in touch with friends I’m not with. Micropayments are great for many things. But let’s not build all relationships on money. Trust is where it’s at.
Liking is akin to nodding.. I can nod even if I disagree with someone. I can nod even if I don’t like what someone is saying. It’s an acknowledgement that I understand what they mean, and because it costs nothing, that’s how it should be used.
High value would correlate with zaps received, not zaps given.
There has been lots of discussion the past couple days. People have been flaming JB for removing the ability to like ppls posts that are in OnlyZap mode even tho the recipient will never see it. So he reverted that. This is all in Damus TestFlight.
In which case, they will have to buy #bitcoin. Thereby, driving the value of #bitcoin up, which, in turn, would destroy their establishment.
Given the extra dopamine release with zaps, and how we saw society change with likes, I'm not sure where we are heading in a way. Never before social media people were all rushing to record a disaster on their cameras thinking how popular the video was going to be
Now hide reposts and we’re a financial powerhouse (or something)
No I read that right. You read mine wrong. I dont think there should be an algorithm to inform. An algo is the source of many problems. Turns social media into a drug. Encourages advertisers to hack it. Discourages 1:1 sociality (making actual friends) in place of becoming more popular. This is also my problem with zaps. Its like paying people to be your friend? Whatever happened to the intrinsic value that relationships used to have on their own??
This may not be a bad thing, if only to remind the user of the duality of discourse / financial transaction. Lumping both into a single "thing" may yield unexpected or undesired consequences, like commercialization of thought and speech. The equivalent of clickbait.
Default avatar
nobody 2 years ago
So many people liked this post lol
February 19? 🤯 Seriously? 💗✊🏼💕🧠🏳️‍🌈💫 #[0]
Any app that uses an algorithm will be one that I will very likely abandon. I do not trust algorithms to feed me. The same way I don’t trust AI to teach me.
Any concern that could increase the echo chamber effect someone who’s already susceptible to radicalization? The reason I say that is that if there’s a cost to modifying your recommendations, some people may only want to incur those costs for something they’re passionate about (which, incidentally, are often the same things that radicalize people).
Nice here is the repoost lol and some SATs exactly this thanx #thanx4u2 #nostriches #plebchain #bitcoin #zap
I don’t have one, ok so basically is to send someone sats ?! And is called zap ? Btw which one is the best wallet for privacy ? 🙏🏼
So zapping is like.. tipping ?! I don’t have a Lightning address, BTW, Which wallet is the best for privacy concerns? 🙏🏼
I don’t have one, ok so basically is to send someone sats ?! And is called zap ? Btw which one is the best wallet for privacy ? 🙏🏼
Tina's avatar
Tina 2 years ago
امیدوارم یک روز چنین چیزی اتفاق بیوفتد💖🌹👌
Nah likes are fine, they are also polite acknowledgements of stuff you ...well like, but don't need reposting or zapping, or sometimes even inspire a reply. Replies probably more valuable than all of these options imo.
I agree, zap dynamic does not exist outside of social media dynamics, parasocial dynamics, and often signal nothing of value outside of the two parties even.
Like/Reaction is only for "I saw your post and here's my reaction" or "I like your post". Replacing reactions completely by zaps sounded like you are trying to make nostr bitcoiner exclusive.
signoi's avatar
signoi 1 year ago
I'm sure that for some like myself likes get my dopamine flowing a little, though agree that zaps are more exciting. Functionally, likes could also add value if you could sort a searchable nostr database by them, or incorportate into seach algo. But I do think it would be interesting to see how a zaps and reposts only network would grow differently from one with likes.
( -_-)'s avatar
( -_-) 1 year ago
I don't need to see the same thing reposted 100 times on my feed though
Zaps are the zero emotion way of exchanging value for a post. Removing the react would turn nostr gray and dull. Not all value can be represented by sats. For the user who wishes to conserve their sats and still send their regards, reacts are tool for them. Just like an interaction in person, you don't give someone a dollar for making you smile. The reaction is by itself the reward. View quoted note →
nibblez's avatar
nibblez 1 year ago
Don't take likes away from me. As a normie, I don't care about bitcoin or zaps.
Shogun's avatar
Shogun 1 year ago
What about a zap button that expresses something similar to a “dislike” button? The user experience on platforms like YouTube suffer without them imo
sfgirly's avatar
sfgirly 1 year ago
looking at it from a human perspective I'd say a repost is something you yourself would say or vehemently agree with, while a like is something you just like. 🥰
Yes. I guess. I'm not really onboard with this, although can't really grasp solid arguments. The marketing would have to be good, because Nostr doesn't have already mentioned reputation, doesn't solve problems of a normie..basically I'm coming to the thought that this thing is basically against onboarding new people. Why would anyone learn about zap and invest own money into something so wild with small reach? Nostr is already fighting this, letting people think they have to pay (I know, one sat, still you need to have it first) will drive many off. I know what's good here, but hope you'll get my point. I think Nostr isn't grown up yet.
On the other hand it might be better to do it soon and grow slower than big noisy shift later on. Also it would be nice to have feature, that zaps 1 immediately. I'm on fruit and zapping everyone for every shit would drive me crazy.
I've unfollowed people who repost too much, it's like they add their timeline to mine. Spam. People who put in valuable posts, but then comes a wave of other stuff. It gets annoying quickly, no matter how good the stuff is.🧐 Mention is way more interesting, the reposter has to put in more effort than just a click.
I just put my reputation on the line Fren with the repost of your note……. But it is merited as I concur…….
Craig Lively's avatar
Craig Lively 11 months ago
I liked your note, but it's ok, because I did so ironically.
Craig Lively's avatar
Craig Lively 11 months ago
Yes! I just got here a few days ago. I have but a miniscule number of Sats. Even if I had a whole sackful of Bitcoin though, I can't seem to figure out this wallet situation yet. I can't zap anyone using my clunky current setup.
Default avatar
npub1am50...ks29 11 months ago
Let's make a deal... image
jack's avatar jack
I hope someday reposts and zaps completely replace the need for “likes”/🤙🏼. Reposts and zaps are true value exchange…and have a real cost: your reputation or money. Likes are superficial and exist only to inform an algorithm. Relevance algorithms have their place, but they are best informed by a truly costly action.
View quoted note →
What if the post doesn't really give me any value but I still like it? I mean come on y'all.. I can like something but not feel I have to pay for it.
jack's avatar jack
I hope someday reposts and zaps completely replace the need for “likes”/🤙🏼. Reposts and zaps are true value exchange…and have a real cost: your reputation or money. Likes are superficial and exist only to inform an algorithm. Relevance algorithms have their place, but they are best informed by a truly costly action.
View quoted note →
BDC's avatar
BDC 11 months ago
No more likes. I only zap now. If I can’t even zap one skinny sat, do I even really like it. I think not. Stay humble and zap sats!!
There is nothing wrong with algorithms choosing the content you see, if you are allowed to choose the algorithm or define the algorithm by your self.