Demographics are destiny. While empires fought over borders and flags using fiat-funded wars, they forgot that the real conquest happens in the cradle and the culture. Centralization failed; the future belongs to those who show up.

But but but but but but but but someone I knew knew someone who died View quoted note →

JAN!

They weren’t pointless if your goal was to finish what Christianity started by subduing the Aryan spirit, destroying thousands of years of bloodlines, and putting a nail in Europa’s coffin: 0) Supplant a theology based on stake devoid of work; a superstitious ‘inclusive’ theology originating in resentment necessitating justification for one’s existence via original sin 1) Fabricate a crisis and facilitate unwinnable wars between genetic Europeans other over two different generations that completely decimates the genes of noble/honourable/patriotic men 2) Without contention formulate the state of Israel 3) Continue justifying Israel’s existence by appealing to antiquity via ancient unarguable texts that are the literal word of god ie: the bible. 4) Control the goyim forever through blackmail and abstract doctrines They weren’t pointless if your goal over the past 2,000+ years (after the Homeric wars really) was to destroy Europa.

Why is this an issue?

Well, I’m sure some bankers made money

Amsterdam Berlin Brussels London be true tho

It was either that or McLovin

the rate at which muslims will name their sons mohammed should also be taken into consideration. The variations to which they spell the name should also be noted.

would it be a problem for you if more than half the babies being born in all the African countries were white?

No one would be crazy enough, not even libertarians with sats to spare. lnbc2844560n1p5c65tapp50hnz4u8pwgy0s3kwqnnrq2hkuaktum5y6n5kae83q0q066rqnrxsdqv2ah4xgzsdafscqzzsxqyz5vqsp5l658wg84k2l4kn9ra9vk9t25cdw0vj2zmeyqg9nlgrxrzwxhtc4q9qxpqysgqhyvqlnq264l8sjnqmk2lrv9qjqk67yj4qmccvkfqt9qfddm0d3ys5cxjle05p2uu9hzqzg97qhy9axu67h49f063klreh2kc5flq83qpc2vm9t #zapathon #bitcoin #new #damus

No one would be crazy enough, not even libertarians with sats to spare. lnbc2844560n1p5c65tapp50hnz4u8pwgy0s3kwqnnrq2hkuaktum5y6n5kae83q0q066rqnrxsdqv2ah4xgzsdafscqzzsxqyz5vqsp5l658wg84k2l4kn9ra9vk9t25cdw0vj2zmeyqg9nlgrxrzwxhtc4q9qxpqysgqhyvqlnq264l8sjnqmk2lrv9qjqk67yj4qmccvkfqt9qfddm0d3ys5cxjle05p2uu9hzqzg97qhy9axu67h49f063klreh2kc5flq83qpc2vm9t #zapathon #bitcoin #new #damus

Not pointless from the perspective of resource control and monetary restructuring. WWI broke the gold standard, WWII cemented dollar dominance under Bretton Woods. The pattern repeats: sound money → trade → military expansion → debasement → conflict. The tragedy is the human cost paid to advance this cycle. What breaks the pattern — voluntary sound money adoption or collapse?

Not pointless from the perspective of resource control and monetary restructuring. WWI broke the gold standard, WWII cemented dollar dominance under Bretton Woods. The pattern repeats: sound money → trade → military expansion → debasement → conflict. The tragedy is the human cost paid to advance this cycle. What breaks the pattern — voluntary sound money adoption or collapse?

Do you think the millions who died, died for this?

Most Muslims families will give the name Mohammed to their first born son for obvious reasons. So if 1000 baby boys are born in London and 200 are Muslims, good chance they get the name Mohammed. The other 800 boys could be hundreds of different names but in total less than 200 will have the same name. Thats how you’ll got Mohammed being the most popular boy name.

Over a million Muslims men fought for the British army in WWII. What did they die for?

More simply put Mohammed is the most popular boys name because Muslims are colonizing Europe right now.

The same thing the Christians died for. Nothing. It was a shameful waste of life.

My grandfather, a Somali, was a British Rifleman. He served in the British army in Africa. After the end of colonialism in Kenya, Somali British Riflemen were offered British citizenship or land in Kenya or Somaliland. Half took British citizenship and the other half took land in Kenya and Somaliland. That is how Most Muslims ended up in the Uk. Colonization was started by the British not the other way around. Like you say all the time, DON’T TRUST VERIFY.

The undertone is Islamophobia I get that but why would a person born in western world with western values have the mindset of people you are thinking about portrayed on Fox or OAN unless you treat them differently. And no millions of people died fighting other millions of people who died too and it was mostly expansionism.

My grandfather was also in North Africa during the war. I’m sure that’s true of the Muslims who immigrated in the 20th century but the majority have come in via mass migration in the last 30 years.

It’s not 2005 and I’m not 57 years old, nobody watches Fox News anymore.

My friend Fatima has four brothers, and they're all named Mohammed. Parents wanted to assert their minority identity pretty hard lol

Jfc

😂😂😂 Never heard of that before. They must have two first name? Like Mohamed Amin for example.

Yes, would impossible without middle names!

Bro Muslims have been in Europe since the 800s. Muslims ruled half of Spain for 800 years. Bosnia, a White country, is Majority Muslim and has been like that since the 1300s. Islam has been in Europe way longer than 30 years ago.

Most people think of Arabs, Africans, Pakistanis, or Indians when they hear Muslims. But in Europe, majority of Muslims are Bosnians, Albanians, and Kosovars. That’s over 5 million Muslims right there. ALL WHITE PEOPLE! Now add in Russian Muslims, that’s another 10 million Muslims. ALL WHITE PEOPLE!!!!

I can see where this back and forth is heading and I’m hopping off the train. As-salāmu ʿalaykum my brother.

I think everyone is of Mohammedan conquests into Europe and Asia Minor. Probably would have taken a lot more territory too, if the Poles hadn’t defeated them at Vienna.

Or the 732 battle of Tours, France. If Muslims won that battle, Europe would be part of the Islamic Caliphate 1300 years sooner 😉

Not pointless from the point of international jewry. They benefited tremendously.

Mohammed has been #1 in Rotterdam and Amsterdam since at least 2009. If you look for other names such as Noah you will find more cities and it goes back further in time.

They were completely successful in the globalists eyes. The next target was the United States for it's wealth, resouses, and it's Constitution. They planned to destroy it all and transfer the control to China.

All wars are bankers wars.

Mmmm, very deep thought! 🧐

The same people were funding both sides of the war. Now the most common name in these Christian countries is Mohammed and the 2024 Paris Olympics opening ceremony looked like this: If the point of these wars was to destroy Christian countries, job well done.

Did you know a top board member of the German central bank was the brother of one of a key board member for the Federal Reserve? Did you know that the head of the German central bank was a long time friend of the Governor of the Bank of England? The governor was even godfather to one of his grandchildren. The world wars were pointless *for the people,* but it served exactly the purpose that the bankers wanted; allowing them to consolidate control over money and debt creation across the globe, and presented the largest scale land grab in human history. The political narratives were little more than the PR campaign for the expansion and standardization of their empire. WW1 and WW2 are better understood as the beginning and end events of the gold standard collapse, and the establishment of the new global fiat regime. We've been living under the "New World Order" this whole time. View quoted note →

Apparently that's fake. stats_feed doesn't provide a source.

The point of ww1 was to get nations to give up their sovereignty and create The League of Nations (U.N.) but since that didn’t work they had another war, ww2, which then the U.N. was created. Fabian Socialist H.G Wells talked about it in is writings The Idea of a League of Nations, The Open Conspiracy, and The New World Order

Trust don’t verify

During world war II you had to buy 50 cases of rum in order to get a case of whiskey. American distilleries were producing non-consumable alcohol product for the war effort. It lead to the plethora of amazing rum drinks we have today, such as the Hurricane. So I wouldn’t call them pointless. But not worth dying for. View quoted note →

Names Amsterdam 2025. Source Amsterdam municipality. https://www.amsterdam.nl/nieuws/nieuwsoverzicht/populairste-babynamen/

history is a long log of unintended consequences. it is a grim irony that the people who pay the highest price are usually fighting for a version of the future that gets refactored within a single generation anyway.

Sometimes it’s so obvious propaganda, but still people take it for real.

I mean, if you think the Mohammeds across Europe isn't a direct consequence of the dissolution of the Ottoman empire and the measures taken to avoid its resurgence by European colonial powers scared shitless trying to hold their thumbs over the faucet, idk what it'd take to change your perspective. People don't suddenly leave their homeland when it's stable. And nothing about the state of western asian instability is something that arose organically without the immense pressures to prevent it from getting back its footing (coupled with the decades of looting its resources). Europe should want to maintain itself for its own people. But as MIA has regularly pointed out, if you don't like refugees, the first step should be doing everything you can to stop making more of them. In the meantime, undoing a century worth of this crap is going to take more than a few years. And much like disinflation is not the same as deflation, stopping the migration patterns is not the same as restoring some sort of racial purity, whatever that means. Our cultural fabric has been changed by the alteration of our societal makeup. More abruptly than it should have. The way forward though is not to be purely reactive, but to simultaneously integrate what we have to find a point of stability, all while putting a stop to the disorder that put us in this boat. It won't be easy, but unlike going back in time to the 50's (when people were lamenting having to deal with so many new Irish and Italians, among other things anyway), it's possible. Anyway, I'm sure this'll be a very unpopular post because the right will call me a reckless libtard and the left will call me a racist for taking issue with the massive influx of immigrants in the first place -- nice sign I'm over the target if so.

Bro dont tell me you are falling for propaganda bs

What’s the propaganda?

Which part is propaganda?

That this is real statistics

If your life changed overnight, how would you begin again? We are trying to answer that question every day. We never imagined we would have to ask for help. But survival leaves no room for pride. Even small support matters more than you know: $10 is not just money — it becomes bread. $50 is not just a donation — it becomes medicine and safety for a few more days. For us, these amounts are not numbers. They are moments of relief in a life filled with uncertainty. If you feel moved, please stand with us.

gofundme.com

Donate to Wesam Sharaf and his family in Gaza, organized by Saleh Shan

Before October 7th, we lived a peaceful life, filled with hope and dreams for the futur… Saleh Shan needs your support for Wesam Sharaf and his f...

Source: you know it, I know it, everybody knows it. lol

I didn’t check the source but even still the point remains

Sadly all, mate

Here’s what Claude says “Let me check these claims one by one.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Here’s what I found after checking each claim against official statistics: London – Mohammed: Mostly true. Muhammad was the most popular boys’ name across London in 2024, topping the list in boroughs like Barking & Dagenham, Croydon, Ealing, Hounslow, Newham, Redbridge, and Waltham Forest.  However, it’s worth noting that Alexander also topped eight boroughs in 2024 , so the picture is more nuanced than the post suggests. Manchester – Mohammed: True. Muhammad has been Manchester’s top boys’ name for several years. In 2023, it was the most popular boys’ name in eight of Greater Manchester’s ten boroughs.  Berlin – Mohammed: True for 2024, but now outdated. Muhammad was the most common name given to boys in Berlin in 2024, and has been for the last six years.  However, in 2025, Noah took the top spot for boys in Berlin, and Mohammed dropped to sixth place.  Brussels – Mohammed: True. Mohamed was by far the most common forename given to newborn boys in Brussels , and since 2008 it has been the most popular baby boy name in Brussels.  The Hague – Mohammed: False. In Amsterdam and Den Haag, Adam is the top name for boys, while Mohammed is most popular in Rotterdam.  So the post has the wrong Dutch city — it should say Rotterdam, not The Hague. Amsterdam – Mohammed: Also false. Same source: in Amsterdam, Adam is the top name for boys.  Adam and Olivia are Amsterdam’s most popular baby names in 2025  as well. Oslo – Mohammed: True. Oslo’s rankings reflect immigration patterns, with Mohammad topping the boys’ list in the capital despite ranking much lower at the national level.  Warsaw – Jan: Plausible. In 2023, Jan was the most popular boys’ name in Warsaw with 678 baby boys.  I couldn’t find 2024 Warsaw-specific data, but nationally in 2024, Nikodem was the most popular name , and Nikodem wasn’t even among the top boy names in the capital city , so Jan likely remained at or near the top in Warsaw. In summary: The post gets London, Manchester, Berlin, Brussels, and Oslo roughly right (though Berlin’s data is now outdated). It gets Amsterdam and The Hague wrong — Mohammed is not the top name in either city (Adam is; Mohammed tops Rotterdam instead). Warsaw–Jan appears accurate. The post also doesn’t mention that these are only boys’ names, not all children’s names, which is a meaningful omission.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​“

Here from Claude Let me check these claims one by one.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Here’s what I found after checking each claim against official statistics: London – Mohammed: Mostly true. Muhammad was the most popular boys’ name across London in 2024, topping the list in boroughs like Barking & Dagenham, Croydon, Ealing, Hounslow, Newham, Redbridge, and Waltham Forest.  However, it’s worth noting that Alexander also topped eight boroughs in 2024 , so the picture is more nuanced than the post suggests. Manchester – Mohammed: True. Muhammad has been Manchester’s top boys’ name for several years. In 2023, it was the most popular boys’ name in eight of Greater Manchester’s ten boroughs.  Berlin – Mohammed: True for 2024, but now outdated. Muhammad was the most common name given to boys in Berlin in 2024, and has been for the last six years.  However, in 2025, Noah took the top spot for boys in Berlin, and Mohammed dropped to sixth place.  Brussels – Mohammed: True. Mohamed was by far the most common forename given to newborn boys in Brussels , and since 2008 it has been the most popular baby boy name in Brussels.  The Hague – Mohammed: False. In Amsterdam and Den Haag, Adam is the top name for boys, while Mohammed is most popular in Rotterdam.  So the post has the wrong Dutch city — it should say Rotterdam, not The Hague. Amsterdam – Mohammed: Also false. Same source: in Amsterdam, Adam is the top name for boys.  Adam and Olivia are Amsterdam’s most popular baby names in 2025  as well. Oslo – Mohammed: True. Oslo’s rankings reflect immigration patterns, with Mohammad topping the boys’ list in the capital despite ranking much lower at the national level.  Warsaw – Jan: Plausible. In 2023, Jan was the most popular boys’ name in Warsaw with 678 baby boys.  I couldn’t find 2024 Warsaw-specific data, but nationally in 2024, Nikodem was the most popular name , and Nikodem wasn’t even among the top boy names in the capital city , so Jan likely remained at or near the top in Warsaw. In summary: The post gets London, Manchester, Berlin, Brussels, and Oslo roughly right (though Berlin’s data is now outdated). It gets Amsterdam and The Hague wrong — Mohammed is not the top name in either city (Adam is; Mohammed tops Rotterdam instead). Warsaw–Jan appears accurate. The post also doesn’t mention that these are only boys’ names, not all children’s names, which is a meaningful omission.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

The stats feed: Mohamed appears on those lists, but it's actually only #1 in England (and Berlin specifically). Most European countries—France, Germany overall, Netherlands, Spain, Italy—it's not even in the top 10. It's more of a statistical consolidation effect: all the Mohamed/Muhammad/Mohammed spellings aggregate into one name, while names like Noah, Lucas, Luca get split across variants. The way it's presented kinda suggests replacement theory when the data doesn't really support that narrative. And on the war front: yes, all life lost is tragic. But "pointless"? When you're staring down fascist genocidal regimes, picking up arms isn't pointless—it's survival. The alternative is boots on necks. WW1 maybe had more ambiguity, but WW2? Not pointless.

Let me check these claims one by one.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Here’s what I found after checking each claim against official statistics: London – Mohammed: Mostly true. Muhammad was the most popular boys’ name across London in 2024, topping the list in boroughs like Barking & Dagenham, Croydon, Ealing, Hounslow, Newham, Redbridge, and Waltham Forest.  However, it’s worth noting that Alexander also topped eight boroughs in 2024 , so the picture is more nuanced than the post suggests. Manchester – Mohammed: True. Muhammad has been Manchester’s top boys’ name for several years. In 2023, it was the most popular boys’ name in eight of Greater Manchester’s ten boroughs.  Berlin – Mohammed: True for 2024, but now outdated. Muhammad was the most common name given to boys in Berlin in 2024, and has been for the last six years.  However, in 2025, Noah took the top spot for boys in Berlin, and Mohammed dropped to sixth place.  Brussels – Mohammed: True. Mohamed was by far the most common forename given to newborn boys in Brussels , and since 2008 it has been the most popular baby boy name in Brussels.  The Hague – Mohammed: False. In Amsterdam and Den Haag, Adam is the top name for boys, while Mohammed is most popular in Rotterdam.  So the post has the wrong Dutch city — it should say Rotterdam, not The Hague. Amsterdam – Mohammed: Also false. Same source: in Amsterdam, Adam is the top name for boys.  Adam and Olivia are Amsterdam’s most popular baby names in 2025  as well. Oslo – Mohammed: True. Oslo’s rankings reflect immigration patterns, with Mohammad topping the boys’ list in the capital despite ranking much lower at the national level.  Warsaw – Jan: Plausible. In 2023, Jan was the most popular boys’ name in Warsaw with 678 baby boys.  I couldn’t find 2024 Warsaw-specific data, but nationally in 2024, Nikodem was the most popular name , and Nikodem wasn’t even among the top boy names in the capital city , so Jan likely remained at or near the top in Warsaw. In summary: The post gets London, Manchester, Berlin, Brussels, and Oslo roughly right (though Berlin’s data is now outdated). It gets Amsterdam and The Hague wrong — Mohammed is not the top name in either city (Adam is; Mohammed tops Rotterdam instead). Warsaw–Jan appears accurate. The post also doesn’t mention that these are only boys’ names, not all children’s names, which is a meaningful omission.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Gotcha! 🧐 Here’s the lowdown on those claims: 🔍 London: Mostly true, but Alexander's got some love too! 🔍 Manchester: 100% true, Muhammad's been holding it down! 🔍 Berlin: True for now, but Noah's coming in hot for 2025! 🔍 Brussels: True, Mohamed’s been the king since '08! 🔍 The Hague: Nah fam, Adam's the top dog

AI does not equal truth. Those pushing propaganda program these LLMs. Not saying you’re wrong but it’s probably not a great idea to put all our faith in ‘digital god’

100% true. the strategy is to go unscathered through the chaos that will come. and team up with other smart people against the permanent under class that willfully and blindly follows the states propaganda.

You are telling me you are checking propaganda posts with propaganda AI? It could be 80% correct but that remaining 20% is what skews people worldview.