Replies (130)

Seems to be happy to enjoy his freedom to express authoritarian ideas
Cody's avatar
Cody 5 days ago
"it's time to limit the First Amendment.......to protect it" wtf?!?!? "It's time to limit water..... to protect the thirsty"
Alex W's avatar
Alex W 5 days ago
Lol this is exactly what authoritarianism is.. 🤣
someone's avatar
someone 5 days ago
wot of the world vs wot of nostr which one will outlast
Motosashi's avatar
Motosashi 5 days ago
Sounds like he has the accent of freedom
They are a tribe that seeks to dominate every country on earth based on lies, false bloodlines, and magical powers in a fantasy novel. They have zero morals and the world now realizes it. The only way to fight their money and power is what he now seeks to control. 🔥👆 Even Science is Redacted! www.redactedscience.org
u32Luke's avatar
u32Luke 5 days ago
"I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
CptKook's avatar
CptKook 5 days ago
Lol a sure-fire way to lose to China. Straight fud
Default avatar
Qanon 5 days ago
Jews like this man are allied with western ideals. Christianity and judiasm should be the back bone of the western world.
Foreign interference, his use of the word 'we' is obnoxious. Lets start dictating to Israel, no more of this Jewish supremacy crap.
R's avatar
R 5 days ago
💯. This is the only proper response.
Whether it’s Israel or England or Australia or Canada there’s an all out assault on our first amendment rights by our supposed “allies”. It’s time to cut funding to any foreign subversive attempting to deprive Americans of their liberties.
Just the ones in charge, along with the people in charge of most countries.
Unpopular opinon: being anti-national
thepurpose's avatar thepurpose
Usually I wouldn’t waste time amplifying a low‑signal debate, but I keep seeing people conflate “anti‑national” with “anti‑American.” Let me set the record straight: being anti‑national means I’m fundamentally distrustful of nationalism as an ideology -not of any specific country. Nationalism is the belief that a nation’s interests, culture, or identity should dominate politics and that loyalty to the nation is the highest virtue. When I say I’m anti‑national, I’m questioning that premise wherever it shows up - whether it’s French, Chinese, Brazilian, or American nationalism. I’m wary of the way nationalism can breed exclusion, blind patriotism, and conflict. That’s very different from being anti‑American, which would imply I oppose the United States itself - its people, institutions, or policies - while possibly accepting nationalism in other contexts. My stance is global: I’m skeptical of any movement that places the nation above individuals or universal values. Think of it like the tech argument in @walker ’s note: “Don’t let identity politics dictate your relay policy.” Just as @walker urges us to choose node software based on merit rather than tribal allegiance, I urge us to evaluate ideas on their own merits rather than accepting them because they come wrapped in nationalist rhetoric. In short, I’m not hating America; I’m rejecting the notion that any nation as we know it should exist. Networkstate mindfuck included. View quoted note → h/t @walker. PV 🫂
View quoted note →
El Zeta's avatar
El Zeta 5 days ago
The window is closing very fast to get out of the western world. Have that plan B ready
No! You are self-immolating by accepting Islam and being illegal in your own lands. You have already decided to kill yourselves. Don't blame Israel for this. Your problem is not Israel, your problem is INTERNAL.
Stjepan's avatar
Stjepan 5 days ago
How is Israel, England, Australia or Canada assaulting US first amendment? Even if they wanted, they couldn't. It's US internal thing. Only US citizens can change it from inside. And those countries proved that are not "supposed" allies. They proved it when US called for help. They came, helped, bled and died for US.
The fact that you're attacking Israel and not THAT SPECIFIC SON OF A BITCH already dilutes your fight. Your enemies are the AGENTS, not faceless entities. That kind of thinking is STUPID!
I didn't accuse you of being Muslim. I only accused you of being STUPID. The entire American people, especially the right wing, are acting stupidly by maximizing Israel and forgetting about Qatar, and all the atrocities that Islam is committing on AMERICAN SOIL in collusion with the DEMOCRATS.
The Jews that voluntarily leave from Palestine now will be spared, the ones who stay will be treated with “an eye for an eye”
You are clearly an anti-Semite. I really hope the Muslim Brotherhood screws over your country, and then you'll see who the enemy is. But it will be too late.
FEW_BTC's avatar
FEW_BTC 5 days ago
what you're missing is the same people that control those countries control the US.
Stjepan's avatar
Stjepan 5 days ago
1st amendment is external thing, not internal US thing and England, Australia and Canada did not respond when US called for help?!
weev's avatar
weev 5 days ago
Israel never came, helped, or bled for the United States. Australia certainly did, they sent troops to assist us with the First and Second World Wars, and in recent times the Korean War, Vietnam War, Gulf War, Afghanistan, and Iraq. But all Israel has ever done is attack the USS Liberty. Don’t you fucking dare compare those goddamned scheming yids in Israel to our actual greatest ally, Australia. Regardless, Aussies should fuck right off if they want to interfere with free speech.
Default avatar
Qanon 5 days ago
USA Israel and UK are the holy trinity
Stjepan's avatar
Stjepan 5 days ago
Propaganda can be a tool, a technique, a process and yes, a weapon. It’s used by everyone. Governments, political movements, corporations, media, religions, advocacy groups, and individuals. The US uses it. Canada uses it. The UK and Australia use it. Businesses use it. Private citizens use it. If using propaganda disqualifies someone as an ally, then the US has never was an ally to anyone and had an ally and no country has ever been a friend to another. As long as humans have tried to influence opinions, propaganda has existed. That’s just reality. By that standard, even internal political campaigning would count as hostile action. Which is obviously absurd. For example: Elon Musk openly encourages Europeans to vote for extremists and attacks moderate political solutions. He’s far from the only American doing this. So hearing accusations of “foreign propaganda” coming from the US is, frankly, ironic. What’s really interesting in the current situation is this: People are suddenly calling influence from the UK, Canada, and Australia “propaganda” countries that have admired the US for decades, adopted large parts of US culture, and literally fought, bled, and died alongside Americans when the US asked for help. At the same time, many of those same people downplay or ignore propaganda from China and Russia countries whose explicit goal is to weaken the US and reshape it into something more like themselves. If I were China or Russia, my primary objective would be simple: Use propaganda to divide Americans. Help elect the most incompetent and corrupt leadership possible. Convince people that longtime allies are enemies. Wrap it all in slogans about “making the country great again”. You are being played but you have no idea by who.
Stjepan's avatar
Stjepan 5 days ago
And none of which is attack on US 1st amendment like i wrote in my original replay.
Stjepan's avatar
Stjepan 5 days ago
Reality is always more complicated than one sentence or word. I tend to explain my positions and do not let others make my positions up.
The subject of the OP is an Israeli citizen making his case (propaganda) as to why the US First Amendment needs to be "limited in order to protect it" Americans would be rightly justified in perceiving this propaganda as an "attack" or "assault" on the First Amendment
The israelis that don't think like this would remain loyal to the Israelis who do think like this rather than forming an allegiance with any of the goyim.
Stjepan's avatar
Stjepan 5 days ago
If you think that individual talking on TV is attack or assault than you have WAY bigger problems than you think you have.
thank you for that insight, it's incredibly vague (and ominous!!), but thanks anyways have a nice day
FEW_BTC's avatar
FEW_BTC 5 days ago
iow, those influencing speech restrictions in those countries are influencing speech restrictions in the US.
HODL_MOGUL's avatar
HODL_MOGUL 5 days ago
they can come and try to control nostr, good luck!
Stjepan's avatar
Stjepan 5 days ago
Confusing speech with censorship. Thinking criticism equals an “attack.” Not understanding that the First Amendment restricts the government, not private individuals or TV commentators, etc. Criticizing, talking about change etc. of 1st amendment is ironically protected by1st amendment. And that's not all. For attack on 1st amendment to have an effect, 1st amendment would have to be changed. For 1st amendment to be changed, there should be overwhelming support of American people. What do you think American people are like if you think that someone talking on TV can make them support changing 1st amendment? Do you see a problem there? No...do you see multiple big problems there? If you think that talking does change minds of big majority, if all it takes is talk to loose foundation of your country, what does that tell you about whole thing? Do you see multiple problem there? Thinking that Canada, England or Australia are somehow attacking US 1st amendment and are not real allies, while ignoring Russia and China, that's absolutely ridiculous and tells more about you than about system that you think is attacked or US citizens that you think would be willing to change it because of that attack. And all that while US president is limiting reporters....holy shit dude....holy shit.
dangershony's avatar
dangershony 5 days ago
100% Agree Though I am pretty sure private defence companies are the lobbies and main benefactors of such "funding"
Jamie's avatar
Jamie 5 days ago
More like the US is tightening things. I live close to a border so my son plays hockey against US teams. In order to enjoy watching my son play, I have to potentially give up biometric data that is stored for my entire lifetime. image
Jamie's avatar
Jamie 5 days ago
We have free speech. As an example, I visited parliament last summer and outside was a demonstration against Covid. This demonstration was not stopped by anyone and I can only assume it has been going on for years. Respectfully, I hope you stop categorizing Canada as a captured socialist country.
You don’t have free speech and you are living in a captured socialist country. Just because your state is weak doesn’t change this fact.
Diyana's avatar
Diyana 5 days ago
Wow. Hope he got vaxxed and all the boosters.
Why is an Israeli allowed to even say that Americans should have their speech limited? Why is he allowed to even say this on TV?
American media won't mention it so i forgive hodl for not knowing. But a simple look online brings up lots of videos and articles about this already happening. USA hasn't had freedom of speech for a long time, Israel just has more control over american media than in other countries so it doesn't get reported, keeping Americans ignorant is a pillar of their system. Like Rockefeller (the one who created the modern American education system) said "I want a nation of workers not thinkers" image
England has Beta leadership. Steir Karmer made sure our inflooence on geopolitics are minimal. Did you see his comments on the Venezuela ordeal?
Tom Lee 's avatar
Tom Lee 3 days ago
It’s funny you talk about your amendment rights - doesn’t every citizen of the world both American and non American have the ‘right’ not to be fucked over by the dollar hegemony yet here we are! It’s a bit rich talking about depriving Americans of there liberties since America has built itself on exploiting countries of the world and in doing so depriving people of their liberties. The funding you are talking about is printed into existence anyway so it’s all one big clown show.