If you could only recommend *one* book that everyone should read, which will fundamentally alter the way they see the world, what would it be? #asknostr

Replies (101)

Isn't it the case that when you already live in a largely christian community you sort of get the gist of bible by osmosis? Does actually reading it change you view of the world in the most massive way? As opposed to reading something more unexpected, contrary to the popular belief...
Haha! I like the click bait title and also how you put it when you said that the realization of the ever persistent clown world is a sobering one and that's absolutely true! Nothing new under the sun, and the solutions to overcoming clown world haven't changed either. Problem is some folks think they're smarter and choose to ignore em
Cody's avatar
Cody 5 months ago
Love the movies, never read the book though
I disagree and I will tell you why. There is a difference between knowing what and knowing why, as the saying goes, the man who knows what will always work for the man who knows why. Point is; do you want to trust that the people around you understand everything the bible says or do you want to understand it for yourself? More so given man's tendency to sweep inconvenient truths under the rug, or distort facts that are contrary to his agenda, would you not want to go directly to the source materials for yourself?
I hear you that you want to read it for yourself to get the 100% of it, but then does it really "fundamentally alter the way they see the world" as walker asked?
Absolutely it does. It does that for me every single year. If you haven't tried it out, I would highly recommend you do. Ball is in your court at the end of the day
Emil's avatar
Emil 5 months ago
I don’t think there is one
I also looked it that way at first until I realized he didn't actually say that and he did say ONE book. If it's one then it would be that one
Part of me wants to say "Being and Time" by Martin Heidegger. But expecting most people to grok it is a big stretch. Hume's Treatise on Human Nature is a bit more approachable, though fwiw it did leave him so dejected that he spent years just playing backgammon in the park when he realized what ontological skepticism gave him in terms of knowledge, or lack thereof. Kant's Critique of Pure Reason probably puts you somewhere in the middle and not quite so dejected, just a little...rigid (like Kant himself). On second thought stay away from scholarly philosophy books if you can read only one. You really need a few to see why they're all wrong but that they all give you a new perspective on the same basic truths. Maybe just pick up Robert Anton Wilson's Illuminatus! trilogy (don't worry, it's one book). It'll entertain you for awhile, and it's chock full of various perspectives from a guy who I'd really rather had been able to live for 500+ years for all he gave us in the space of humor, metaphysics, psychology, politics, and life in general.
I’ve heard from numerous people this book changed their life. Definitely planning on reading it at some point
“In search of the miraculous” by P. D. Ouspenski. Basically alters your world view by altering your inner view. That is the direction: how you view yourself => how you view the world.
This book has convicted me to read books more in the last year than I have in the last ten. “Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business by Neil Postman.”The crazy thing about this text is it was written in 1985. It is mostly a critique on television and the methods used to consume certain types of information, but the internet has made his predictions seem as if he were writing while looking into a crystal ball. I’ve NEVER been more convicted to stop listening, watching, or memeing critical information. The medium is the message. What message are we choosing to consume.
JackTheMimic's avatar
JackTheMimic 5 months ago
To be fair, that is an anthology published in a single volume.
Yeah, it didn't change my worldview fundamentally. There were definitely many things I learned, etc.
Based Truth's avatar
Based Truth 5 months ago
Wake up, they're controlling the narrative, read Brave New World to see the sinister plot unfolding before our eyes
Mentat's avatar
Mentat 5 months ago
At the urging of my uncle I began reading the Bible every day, twice a day. I was 12 years old when I began. I would read and then pray and contemplate. I read and contemplated so much more than was ever discussed in my church, family, or community. Over the next 6 years, until I graduated high school, I read the Bible cover to cover twice, and then the New Testament 3 more times. One of my daily prayers was to be given the wisdom to understand. In time I started noticing that my interpretations weren’t always the same as everyone else’s.. but in my heart I knew they were for me. By the time I was in my early twenties I stopped going to church. It was clear to me that I the God I knew was taking me beyond the community. It was so disorienting at scary at first. But in time as my intimacy and understanding continued to develop and expand I knew I was on the right path. By the end of my twenties I could no longer call myself a Christian. I couldn’t abide by the label or all that came with it. My journey has been deep and dark at times, and yet my intimacy and faith has only grown more rapidly than I could have ever imagined. My understanding has overlaps with Christianity. I absolutely love and continue to model myself after Jesus. But my understandings are often heretical, and are impossible to unsee for me. So should you read the Bible for yourself? I believe so, and do so without letting any man, woman, or institution tell you how you should interpret it. Let only God speak to you through it.
Under rated story. We’re going to be the old heads wanting to still drive 50 years from now
Well, ONE book...people can read it a bunch of times til they get it. Also, not sure anyone ever called me high IQ for majoring in Philosophy before 😆. Though it does seem a more useful major now than it was regarded as at the time.
That resonates, I like that you make the journey and personality your own not relying on someone's interpretation. I know that religion was quite suppressed during communism, so when you went to the church it may have received the suppressed version (even after the fall of sssr)? Out of interest - have you tried reading any other religion books for comparison?
I guess I was thinking of it more as if someone read one book, rather than only one I recommend. That said I tend not to worry so much about maximizing reach, so much as delivering signal to those who are primed to process it. The majority of people never actually shape anything, but get dragged along behind the leadership of the select few men of action.
AlcoB's avatar
AlcoB 5 months ago
Second this. Profound book.
The Problem Of Political Authority by Michael Huemer. Huemer argues that political authority is an illusion. Starting from common moral intutions (don't steal, don't hurt people), he demonstrates that no one has the right to rule and no one is obliged to obey a government merely because it issues commands. The state possesses no special moral status that justifies coercion or obedience, and that common moral intuitions against private coercion (like theft or kidnapping) should apply equally to the state. He dismantles major theories of political authority, such as social contract theory, hypothetical consent, democratic majoritarianism, and consequentialist argument. Instead, he proposes that society can function effectively without a central monopoly on force through competitive private agencies for security and dispute resolution, aligning with an anarcho-capitalist framework.
3 body problem - it will make you feel so small. In a way it makes you confront the inevitability of the end, so you might as well live the best life you can.
lexat's avatar
lexat 5 months ago
The Bitcoin Standard
Harvey_Birdman's avatar
Harvey_Birdman 5 months ago
The Bible should just be a given. Otherwise these kinds of questions are pointless. Of course everyone should read the Bible. Of course it's the greatest book ever written. But it's fun sometimes to think of number 2 and what it means to people.
PK ⚡️'s avatar
PK ⚡️ 5 months ago
Churchill, Hitler, and "The Unnecessary War": How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World by Pat Buchanan It will have you questioning many load-bearing myths
The Creature of Jekyll Island Currently reading it and it's awesome. It's about the creation of the FED and it'll blow your mind. You CAN NOT see our monetary system the way you used to after. Even after studying money, Bitcoin and Austrian economics...
yeah that is what someone would say if never heard of other sacred texts other than the bible lol but yeah bible is a good one its just not the only one talkin about the same wise shit there is a huge ammount of analogies between sacred texts more people should look into them
Mentat's avatar
Mentat 5 months ago
I would agree with you that I experienced a contracted version of Christianity. After I left, to continue my journey alone, I did grasp at other religions for some sense of structural stability. I studied a number of them, large and small, and attended the various gatherings. Each rasped against my spirit in the same way Christianity had. After each attempt the quiet whisper became a little more obvious and was saying something like “what you seek is not in religion, it’s an absolute surrender.” A trust fall into the vast bottomless unknowable. In comparison to that, every ‘ism’ or ‘anity’ is contractive, limited, and acts as an intermediary. I suspect anyone who’s had a profound moment that led to a conversion or dedication to any religion, had exactly that experience of unbounded, surrendered ‘isness’, ‘forgiveness’, and ‘innocence’. But the mind is so quick to try and label and understand and attach to something in the world as the cause, or the way to ‘get back to that experience’.
Siggi's avatar
Siggi 5 months ago
The Creature of Jekyll Island
Sorry, should have been clearer. I meant I pick the book of John. Didn’t realize your name was John lol.