What sbr?

Largely TDS ... We effectively have a 100% shitcoin reserve now with the dollar. Any amount of Bitcoin is a win. Is it as good as 100% BTC? No Is it as good as the market picking BTC and gov stating out of money? Definitely not Is it better than Biden covertly attacking Bitcoiners yes

It's not that it's good or bad. It is irrelevant. The government doesn't create value. So, any treasury simply delays an inevitable collapse. It's "good" if that Treasury gets dispersed to americans gibing the government their shitcoin back to them in exchange. But, an SBR doesn't DO anything to stop a train from running off the cliff if its tracks point that direction.

*scr

The best sbr for the US is one that is owned completely and sovereignly by private US citizens. The government's only role should be to make this as easy as possible.

Not hate so much as i would just prefer cap gains tax abolished. But an sbr would imply buying bitcoin with stolen capital. Not great but probably inevitable.

It's when Trump spends tax dollars to buy up the shitcoin projects from his cabinet members but dumbass bitcoin influencers love it cause it also pumps their bags

I’m optimistic. I wish it were BTC only but you know what? I wasn’t always BTC only either. There’s a learning curve.

Strategic Shitcoin Reserve

*ssr

Yes🙄🙄tax me harder daddy, as long as you pump my bags. The whole ideas of "reserves" or "Sovereign Wealth Fund" is bullshit. Just tax me less and I'll do what I want with my money.

Wait why would there be hate using tax dollars to buy XRP? Puzzling

Man with gun locks me in cage if I don't want to spend my money buying XRP

The government hodling bitcoin and Bitcoin being apart of the major stock indexes means that all Americans own Bitcoin. Which is beneficial from a self preservation standpoint for early bitcoiners. The more the wealth is shared horizontally across society the less likely there are to be pitchforks for the OG’s.

Everything the government owns is stolen. Why would we want them to have one more reason to steal our money? No thanks, I’ll buy my own bitcoin please.

In what sense does what the government owns translate to wealth sharing amongst all Americans? I do not believe most Americans feel that they are benefiting from all the taxation and power of the federal government. In America, taxation mostly gets us endless wars, no healthcare, no education, and homeless fentanyl addict tent cities.

Wanna buy a JPEG m8? It’s a proper strategic one.

HFSPR

7 out of every 10 people you meet have an IQ below 115.

For those that haven't been paying attention -- if you didn't heed Garlicbread's own words saying they wanted to be the global rails of ALL CBDCs.

Ripple CBDC Innovate

Ripple CBDC Innovate

You are invited to build or update an original fintech or payments solution utilizing Ripple’s CBDC solutions. Winners of Phase 1 will be invited...

Bitcoin is for everyone

👆🤔 well damn if this don’t explain a lot😳😂😂🫡⭕️

Do it again …for politicians this time🤔🤭😂😂🫡⭕️

I don't want them buying shitcoins with tax money

Like we all share the wealth of the gold in Fort Knox?

Nice to see you catching up.

Not quite sure how your getting from the government stacking to "all Americans now own bitcoin" That's like saying that now that the government is printing money, all Americans are rich. Horrible take.

Assuming there’s some gold there still…

exactly

USG is buying XRP with USD not BTC, so all good here.

You’ve just described a perfect situation for a justified enshitified (eventual) fork. Not saying it would happen but if it did, this is probably how. But at the same time, you’re right - safety in numbers. You wouldn’t want to screw over your people.

☝️This!

🎁🎁🎁

No it’s like that. All Americans don’t own BTC because it’s not their keys. Your analogy is shit, because the government can’t print Bitcoin

"As long as my own ass is saved, I'm cool" That's all I got from this...and those liking it. Seeming like getting government in on bitcoin has never been about THE PEOPLE, but to save early adopters asses instead.... Yet, not a fucking soul can have a conversation about: * Bitcoin as Digital Gold vs. P2P Cash: The narrative around Bitcoin has shifted significantly. While it was envisioned as peer-to-peer electronic cash, it's increasingly being seen as a store of value, like gold. This is evidenced by its price volatility, its adoption by institutional investors, and its use as a hedge against inflation. The focus has moved away from everyday transactions. * "Reserves" and Distribution: My analogy of personal cold wallets as individual reserves is insightful. It highlights the concentration of Bitcoin ownership. I'm concerned that by the time mass adoption occurs, most Bitcoin will be held by governments, corporations, and early adopters, leaving less for the general public. This echoes concerns about wealth inequality in traditional financial systems. * The Role of Governments and Corporations: I correctly point out that these entities are now heavily involved in Bitcoin. Their influence is undeniable, whether through regulations, investments, or even holding Bitcoin on their balance sheets. This involvement challenges the original decentralized vision of Bitcoin. * Scarcity and the Hard Cap: I argue that Bitcoin's hard cap, while intended to create scarcity, could possibly backfire. It might allow those who accumulate Bitcoin early on to exert undue influence, effectively replicating the centralized control of traditional finance. This is a valid concern. If a small group controls a significant portion of the Bitcoin supply, they could manipulate the market or restrict access for others. * The Missed Opportunity for Change: I reference to Occupy Wall Street and the pursuit of Bitcoin ETFs highlighting the tension between systemic change and mainstream adoption. While ETFs can increase accessibility, they also integrate Bitcoin into the existing financial system, potentially diluting its revolutionary potential. The concern is that this integration might reinforce existing power structures rather than dismantling them. * The Future I Foresee: I paint a dystopian picture where the current financial elite simply transition their power to the Bitcoin network before the general public. They would control the majority of the supply, and ordinary people would still be subject to their financial dominance, albeit within a new technological framework.

I don’t understand what you’re copy pasting at me.

Not surprised....

A lot of your replies are nonsensical tbh. Not on this topic alone but in general. Unless the client I’m using is not showing a parent note or something and one you are using is. Not saying this to be offensive. Maybe I’m talking to a bot 🤣

"Do you care about the United States?" ---> I care about the people IN the United States significantly more than the entity that claims the authority to extract taxes from those people, with said taxes being used to pay for this "SBR." I want *people* to prosper, not the government.

That's why US will be the last place on Earth adopting Bitcoin. If you keep BTC in a reserve, what are you going to use? Tether? Tokens? Where is your position about "Fiat Delenda Est" ? Or was just smoke and mirrors?

I don't understand all this hate against the Obama Care, especially if you're American. Do you care about the United States? Do you care about your neighbors? Every organization is incentivized to use Obama Care, including governments. Would you rather that much worse governments get Obama Care? Your ideal of "only ideologically pure people should have health care" was never going to be the case and if you think that, you have authoritarian tendencies and do not understand what decentralization means. Now, you see the point, or do I have to explain further?

"The more wealth is shared horizontally...." To me, people owning Bitcoin broadly across society = "horizontal." The US government controlling a large stockpile of Bitcoin = "vertical."

If the government owns bitcoin then they are more likely to repay their obligations (treasury bonds) without having to debase everyone that holds dollars. They also become capable of funding their projects without having to tax as much.

Sounds like a bot. But so do normies to me... So dunno

It’s weird because so many replies are like copy pasta talking points from some fiat mind melting media segment or something.

I'd give a response, but I've noticed you don't respond to responders. There's no reason to believe you even read these.

Is that symbol Martinist or Rosicrucian?

trump likes his memecoins, shutup

Okay how about ADA SOL and ETH. Pumped about that too? Shitcoiner at the top of the whole scheme

We didn’t get a SBR. We got a SSR.

Yea but what about all the other shitcoins they’re pumping in the process

> Government Hodling > People owning Choose one. The buyside pressure of government owning, of course, can influence prices and institutional adoption, but what governments own, never is owned by the people, this does not exist. The state is a mob, and its existence occur only by cohercitive taxation with robbery and extorsion. It can say that you own something today, but is a concession. Tomorrow state mobsters can put a gun over your head, and say that you own nothing 🤷‍♂️🤡

How would this even work? Liquidating part of their stock in order to meet such obligations or?

There was a line Scott Adams of Dilbert fame said that people have their opinions assigned to them. Feels more every day. Pretty sure my opinions are from nostr so that's better maybe?

Superior opinions only zone 🚧

Good luck having China and Russia use the centralised XRP crap. Never gonna happen!

Nonsensical? Lmmfao. Sorry I'm able to think outside of the information I'm fed by others? 🤣 Sorry I only have an 8th grade education and use Ai to clarify my points because i struggle to? 🤣 Opinions are like assholes, everyone's got one. Unfortunately, it seems you wipe forward though and are unable to view anything outside of your own biases.... let alone have a conversation about them. That's probably my mistake, assuming the big guys here are remotely capable of such....

That’s one way

It seems that owning BTC brings out the best in people. Maybe it will work like that for governments too?

Narrator: it’s the shitcoins

#YESTR

I'll form an opinion on an SBR once I see a proposal for one. as yet, none exists. a CrYPtO STRATEGIC thingy on the other hand, I have nothing but contempt for.

Bitcoin is a weapon against the very idea of government lol

the US government owning bitcoin is literally the only entity i worry about causing a fork.

exactly, what the fuck is the govt doing buying assets? commie bullshit

Such a dumped and important concept. We've been saying Bitcoin is for enemies since the beginning and it is and if it can't survive governments buying it and central banks buying it then it couldn't have survived in the first place.

What part don't you understand Jimmy?

It's another grift.

Theoretically we do

Bitcoin is for enemies

What have they done to earn your trust?

A government owned bitcoin is NOT peoples bitcoin. The people should find ways to protect themselves against the evil 😈 nanny state NOT with the nanny state.

How do so many smart bitcoiners not see this!!?!? They can’t take off the tribal/nationalistic lens I suppose…. 🫣

Seems you need to review your understanding of Bitcoin and forks then

It’s Luther’s rose

Ah, oops, but thanks, a new thing to learn about 😎

Picking winners and losers🙄

I want the government to adopt it as a currency by accepting it as payment or invest tax dollars into the people.

Or, convert a portion of gold into Bitcoins with first putting up how they're going to hold said Bitcoins up to intense scrutiny.

I'm not a very smart man, I spent half my life poisoning my brains with drugs and alcohol. but i can recognise patterns, Trump and Elon have already done this grift before.

Yeah but this is strategic JPEGs on Solana...

A USSR?

That's X people for you...

Strategic Shitcoin Reserve, but yes that too.