Things you should not be angry about: - Other peoples sexuality - Other peoples politics - Other peoples religious beliefs Things you should be angry about: - Genocide - The Epstein files - Totalitarian surveillance - The cost of living crisis Thank you for your attention to this matter

Replies (104)

INB4 „Eggs are $200 bc people in california are dyeing their hair blue“ and „Charlie Kirk is dead bc his roommate didnt like vaginas“
Yep, it's not the people, it's not even their ideas, it's their actions I vote for reintroduction of accountability for all, for me AND for thee
Old but gold powers' diversionary tactics? Can't you dislike peoples' sexuality, politics, beliefs? I think you can. What you cannot is to use any kind of coercitive action ('legal' or illegal) to limit their freedom as long as their actions don't limit yours. Ideas with ideas, actions with actions? People in power love to fight ideas with actions. Don't they?
I tend to get angry when my internet connection is slow. But on the bigger picture, it doesn’t really matter that much I guess 🤷🏼‍♂️
Sure, I only get angry about the first three if they're to be forced upon me but I always get angry about latter four.
Of course it isn't, I'm only talking about the use of government violence to coerce people to actively participate.
JOE2o's avatar
JOE2o 3 months ago
What about people not waiting for those inside the elevator to walk out before trying to walk in?
Although it’s not sexuality that people take issue with(there are only theee choices anyway), it’s gender identity and that is affecting quite a lot of people, mainly biological females. The fact that I had to qualify that last sentence by actually stating “biological”, should be an indication of the seriousness of this issue. Other people’s politics are why we currently have a felon in the White House. Religion has also gotten quite a few people killed so I wouldn’t write that off so easily either. You don’t have to get angry, but you shouldn’t act as if they have no affect on those around you, if not you. I’m not willing to stick my head in the sand until any of those creep up and bite me in the ass. As far as what I should be angry about, it doesn’t do any good to get upset over something I have no control over. I can’t stop Netanyahu from committing war crimes. I am more concerned about democracy eroding in realtime in favor of fascism, than I am about the sexual exploits of our elected felon. I can’t get Cheeto Hitler out of the White House for at least theee more years, impeachment means nothing when you control the senate, as proven by his first two impeachments. All I can do to make my money stretch, is convert it to bitcoin and hope people accept that..
Stjepan's avatar
Stjepan 3 months ago
I agree with most of this, but some points need important “ifs,” while others I absolutely disagree with. Things I agree with, but with conditions (“ifs”): - Sexuality – I don’t care who sleeps with who, as long as both sides consent. But there are situations where “consent” is questionable, like with minors or people who are mentally unwell. In those cases, it’s not real consent, and that matters. - Epstein files – If they contain proof of crimes, they should absolutely be acted on. But doxing victims or people who weren’t involved in the crimes is wrong. Release the files, but protect victims and those not guilty of anything. Things I absolutely disagree with: - Politics – Politics aren’t just a personal matter; they affect everyone. If someone holds extreme political views and acts on them at the ballot box, that impacts the whole society. Ignoring dangerous politics just gives more space for extremism, whether left or right. - Religious beliefs – Same as politics. Religion shapes decisions, especially on election day. If people push religion into politics or try to impose their beliefs on others, that affects all of society. That’s something worth being angry about.
When I was in government school, we were forced to attend church on certain holidays, I have never been baptized and don't belong to any religion so I was angry that I was made to participate. So far I have never been forced to participate in any sexual activities against my will so no complaints there. And the restrictions based on other people's politics to what I'm allowed to do with my body and property are too numerous to count, I'm sure you , like everyone else, have lots of grievances in that department as well.
It's not sexuality that most people care about, it's the fascistic propagation of it, and crushing of those who speak against that movement.
Akashi Hyogo's avatar
Akashi Hyogo 3 months ago
"You may not be interested in * but * is interested in you" applies to all thimgs "you should not be angry about"
The term „fascistic propagation“ is a definitional self-contradiction Feel free to come back when you figured out what the words you are using mean Thanks for stopping by though
Some leftist take on reality here which completely missed the point and is out of touch Figures
Also to be angry about: - people with PhD’s convincing young children/teens to mutilate their genitals when they are too young to vote or get a tattoo 🤷🏻‍♂️
Default avatar
Vincent 3 months ago
If other people sexuality is being forced upon my under age children. I have every right to be angry, and that anger is righteous. Same with their politics, and their religious beliefs. Gm. ☕️
Default avatar
nobody 3 months ago
this is brilliant im gonna riff off thank you 🌺
don't you think some of those need a little more context like lets go with your first one, other people sexuality. When that involves children, young people that aren't old enough to do a lot of things but their parents or schools feel its in their best interest to mutilate them and pump them full of drugs that will change their lives for ever I think we should be worried. When people are forced to be a part of someone who is confused about their sexuality expose themselves to children or the opposite sex thats a problem. So I don't agree with you on that one.
1) Lesbo detected. 2) No it isn't. All fascistic movements are propagated fascistically. First through regulated media, right through to state mandated schooling and "hate speech" imprisonment for those who speak against it.
These are not just expressed opinions. Children are legally required to be placed in state schooling. If taxation is theft then public schools are kidnapping.
n0>1's avatar
n0>1 3 months ago
This is shit. Telling people what they should worry about. 🤡
Turning a blind eye won’t help save these children… whatever helps you sleep at night.
So were you calling for the Epstein files a couple of years ago? Or did that all of a sudden pop up on your radar because thats what you were fed? Simpletons .... look at the shiny object over here now because we want you to pay attention..... lol
I’m sorry to hear you’ve been brainwashed… I’ve seen disturbing videos of children who have gone through the process, I won’t repost because they are young children. You can find them if you care to learn about reality. image
(To clarify, the videos just show their faces… but regardless I will respect their privacy)
Peace K 🪙's avatar
Peace K 🪙 3 months ago
Politics lead to totalitarianism. Religious beliefs lead to genocide (as seen by what is happening to the Druze in Syria). If you would be angry at the cause you might avoid the outcome
I mean you have a convicted rapist as president who protects his elite friends who where involved in child sex trafficing. He was probably even involved himself. So it does indees sound like the protection of the rights of women and children is not a priority in the US currently.
Please 🙏 speak on this. People who don’t consider the “shoulds” are typically unbalanced IMLE.
The irony of putting “thank you for your attention to this matter” is well played. 😂
Default avatar
Rand 3 months ago
😍i, aye, eye state of /\/\indlO;.;Ok*/*ya 🌟
Perfectly said. Anger should be fuel for justice, not wasted on someone’s personal choices. Focus the fire on the systems destroying lives, not the freedoms that make life worth living. 🧡🧡🧡🐝🐝
Default avatar
Rand 3 months ago
good to know node & app. your reply/replies brO
🛑 INCORRECT. Things you should not be angry about: - That which is distant from or outside of your control or ability to directly verify. Things you should be angry about: - Violence, theft or control over things that are naturally granted to you or created by you.
Should is fine but it should probably go with an “if”. Often times the if statement is left out , and then it becomes the vague imposition if a value system. Like “if you want your dough to rise faster, you should put it in warm humid environment”. Nothing wrong w that
This is a principled approach. Don’t just agree with opinions on subjective topics. Principles don’t change with the news, like the subjective topics chosen in this OP, allowing you to make proper judgments regardless of current circumstances. For example: “Other peoples sexuality” can be forced upon you and your loved ones threatening violence, theft or control over things that are naturally granted to you or created by you. you should be angry about that. You should not be angry about distant topics for which you cannot directly verify are any threat to you. Don’t get up in arms about Eurasia attacking Oceania if you can’t directly verify that it’s real. You should instead question or ignore the “Ministry of Truth” pushing the information on you.
Sure, I agree, I mean I'm for the separation of state and society but by extension, that would include the separation of any churches, clubs, guilds, and all other forms of peaceful, voluntary association from the organized violence of the state 🤷‍♂️
... because say what you will about the church but they, unlike the state, never forced me to attend mass.
Except it's all about politics. The politics of YOUR MONEY.. It is the only issue. The private sector economy has a giant leech on it's back. This is what the fighting is all about. The Democrat wants your money. They're getting violent now because they see that no one wants to live under their Totalitarian boot and be forced to pay for that boot. They cannot live without your money. If they did, they'd be Conservatives. Cost of Living, about money.. Totalitarian surveillance, gov't bureaucrats. Your money paying them.
i want to agree with you because i like pussy but reality is that Genocide and Religion go hand in hand ...
Yeah sure. It can get pedantic. For people I aim to use could instead, along with encouragement instead of direction. And in your example ‘it’, eg “if you want the dough to rise faster, it needs to be in a warm humid environment”, that way it’s presented as an opportunity for the person to own without an implication of being wrong, the focus is on the dough not them. My thinking is more or less that of Adler, and his ideas of horizontal not vertical relationship structures.
Don't tell me I can't be angry about someone else's politics like they aren't going to the ballot box and voting threats of violence against me and my family.
- I’m quite angry about men competing in women’s sport worldwide - I’m frustrated that in the USA, the DNC have lost their mind and are normalizing extremism against those on the right - I’m very worried that many European countries have set in motion a slow moving but inexorable path to Islamic authoritarianism You come across like a scolding 16 year old.